期間を表す「を」と状況を表す「中を」の 文法的な特徴と機能について
On the Grammatical Feature and Function of o as Showing a Period and naka-o as Showing a Situation
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This Paper discusses the issues related to the grammatical features and functions of the o as showing a Period and naka-o as showing a situation. In the usage of case particle o, these forms of o were considered a sort of the usage as showing a move and path in precedent studies. However, there are grammatical deferences between the period o, the situation o and the path o. The first point is that we should discuss that the grammatical features of the period o, the situation naka-o are different from the path o. In order to know that, it is necessary to analyze the indispensability of noun phrase revolving around a verb in a sentence. Moreover, it is also necessary to analyze that there are the differences of movement between the situation o and the path o. In conclusion, it is clear that the period o is parted in the period o① of the indispensable case and the period o② of the secondary case, i.e. the period o② has a different grammatical function with the path o of the indispensable case. Situation naka-o is also parted in the spatial naka-o and the temporal naka-o. The spatial naka-o has a same movement with the path o, but the spatial naka-o is the secondary case. The temporal naka-o has a temporal movement and the grammatical function of situation component.
Abstract
This Paper discusses the issues related to the grammatical features and functions of the o as showing a Period and naka-o as showing a situation. In the usage of case particle o, these forms of o were considered a sort of the usage as showing a move and path in precedent studies. However, there are grammatical deferences between the period o, the situation o and the path o. The first point is that we should discuss that the grammatical features of the period o, the situation naka-o are different from the path o. In order to know that, it is necessary to analyze the indispensability of noun phrase revolving around a verb in a sentence. Moreover, it is also necessary to analyze that there are the differences of movement between the situation o and the path o. In conclusion, it is clear that the period o is parted in the period o① of the indispensable case and the period o② of the secondary case, i.e. the period o② has a different grammatical function with the path o of the indispensable case. Situation naka-o is also parted in the spatial naka-o and the temporal naka-o. The spatial naka-o has a same movement with the path o, but the spatial naka-o is the secondary case. The temporal naka-o has a temporal movement and the grammatical function of situation component.
참고문헌 (16)
- 天野みどり, "日本語構文の意味と類推拡張", pp.141~165 (2011), 笠間書院
- 宇都宮裕章, "ヲ格の境界性─｢範囲｣を定める格としての認定─", 静岡大学教育学部研究報告(人文･社会科学篇), 48, pp.17~32 (1998), 静岡大学
- 佐伯暁子, "現代語における状況を表す｢~(の)中を｣｢~(の)中φ｣について", 日本語文法, 13(2), pp.54~70 (2013)
- 佐伯暁子, "現代語における時間を表すヲ格について", 日本語文法, 17(1), pp.54~70 (2017)
- 柴谷方良, "日本語の分析-生成文法の方法-", pp.221~268 (1978), 大修館書店
- 城田俊, "日本語の格をめぐって", pp.67~94 (1993), くろしお出版
- 申義植, "状況の｢を｣句文成立の意味的な制約について―時間的状況におけるる展開プロセス―", 筑波応用言語学研究, 21, pp.82~95 (2014), 筑波大学応用言語学研究室
- 菅井三実, "日本語論究４･語彙と文法と", pp.475~499 (2003), 和泉書院
- 杉本武, "状況の｢を｣について", 九州工業大学情報工学部紀要(人文･社会篇), 6, pp.25~37 (1993), 九州工業大学
- 스기모토다케시, "格助詞「を」再考", 일어일문학연구, 71(1), pp.3~12 (2009), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 高井岩生, "期間を表すヲ格名詞句の生起条件", 九州大学言語学論集, 33, pp.69~79 (2012), 九州大学
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味 第Ⅰ巻", pp.81~85 (1982), くろしお出版
- 仁田義雄, "日本語の格をめぐって", pp.1~37 (1993), くろしお出版
- 仁田義雄, "副詞的表現の諸相", pp.1~325 (2002), ろしお出版
- 三宅知宏, "日本語の移動動詞の対格標示について", 言語研究, 110, pp.143~168 (1996)
- Hopper, Paul J., "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56(2), pp.251~299 (1980)