‘箕’ 이체자 자형의 변화 양상 연구
A Study on Variant Chinese Characters, Focused on Changes of ‘箕’
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
‘其’가 虛詞로 假借되기 시작하면서 ‘竹’을 의부로 하는 ‘箕’자가 만들어진 시기는 대략 戰國시기로 추정할 수 있다. 본고에서는 29개의 ‘箕’ 이체자 중에서 자형 관련성이 적은 5자를 제외한 나머지 24자를 대상으로 분류와 분석을 진행하였다. 우선 이체자들을 자형구조에 따라 분류한 다음 순차적으로 분석을 진행하였다. 台灣 教育部 異體字字典에서 제시하는 이체자들의 수록 저서와 실제 출토문헌의 출처를 비교해본 결과 자형의 변화가 다양하게 나타나던 戰國文字에서 그 출처를 밝힐 수 있는 이체자는 다섯 자로 나타났다. 다음으로 이체자들 간의 자형 변화과정을 통해 변화규칙을 유추해 보았는데, 첫째, 의부 ‘竹’의 자형변화, 둘째 성부 ‘其’의 자형변화, 셋째, 의부 ‘竹’의 대체, 넷째 類化 등 네 가지 변화규칙을 찾아낼 수 있었다. 이상 ‘箕’ 이체자에 대한 분류와 분석을 통해 이체자들의 변화과정을 알아보고 변화규칙을 찾아냄으로써 또 다른 이체자들의 연구와 고문헌의 정확한 해석에 어느 정도 도움을 줄 것으로 기대한다.
Abstract
The basic form of 箕 was 其, but later, when 其 began to avail it of a syllable, 箕 was created using 竹 as a meaning radical, and this period can be estimated to be the Warring States period. In this thesis, I will conduct a classification and analysis of the transfer letter of 箕, and through this, I will learn the rules of change of this transfer letter. There are a total of 29 transfer letters of 箕, and I conducted classification and analysis of 24 characters. The 24 transfer letters were divided into four categories according to the structure of the shapes and then analyzed sequentially. In the process, the sources from Taiwan's Ministry of Education's transfer letters’ dictionary and the excavated documents were compared and the rules of change were found. First of all, the two characters of the transfer letter differ in origin from Taiwan's Ministry of Education's transfer letters’ dictionary, one of which is and the other is . is found to be similar in the the letters of Warring states period, and is in 楚系簡帛 and 璽彙, respectively. This is meaningful in that it can reveal its provenance in the letters of Warring states period, where various changes in shape were made. Next, the analysis of the transfer letters showed four rules of change: First, the meaning radical 竹 was changed in the form of ‘网’(, 罒), ‘口’, ‘’, ‘巛’, ‘‘(匚)’; Second, the sound radical 其 was transformed into 亓(), (丑), 㐁 and so on; Third, the meaning radical 竹 was replaced by . Fourth, the transfer letters, ‘’, ‘’, ‘’ appear to have been refined under the influence of other letters’ shapes. By classifying and analyzing 箕 transfer letter, I confirmed the origins of some of the transfer letters and recognized the rules of change, which are expected to help some extent in studying the process of change for others. In particular, an accurate understanding of the transfer letters is a necessary task for reading some ancient Chinese characters that can be doubtful and difficult in the process of interpreting.
참고문헌 (32)
- 陳松長, "馬王堆簡帛文字編" (2001), 文物出版社
- 漢語大字典編輯委員會, "漢語大字典" (1986), 四川辭書出版社·湖北辭書出版社
- 漢語大詞典編輯委員會 漢語大詞典編纂處, "漢語大詞典" (2009), 上海辭書出版社
- 何琳儀, "戰國古文字典(戰國文字聲系)" (1998), 中華書局
- 黃 征, "敦煌俗字典" (2005), 上海世紀出版集團, 上海教育出版社
- 季旭昇, "說文新證" (2010), 福建人民出版社
- 蔣紹愚, "古漢語詞彙綱要" (1989), 北京大學出版社
- 李守奎, "楚文字編" (2003), 華東師範大學出版社
- 劉釗, "古文字構形學" (2011), 福建人民出版社
- 劉釗, "新甲骨文編" (2014), 海峽出版發行集團, 福建人民出版社
- 陸錫興, "漢代簡牘草字編" (1989), 上海書畫出版社
- 羅福頤, "漢印文字徵" (1978), 文物出版社
- 羅福頤, "古璽文編" (1981)
- 毛遠明, "韓魏六朝碑刻異體字研究" (2012), 商務印書館
- 駢宇騫, "銀雀山汗簡文字編" (2001), 文物出版社
- 秦公, "碑別字新編" (1985), 文物出版社
- 容 庚, "金文編" (1985), 中華書局出版
- "现代汉语词典" (2012), 商务印书馆
- 施謝捷, "吳越文字匯編" (1998), 江蘇教育出版社
- 湯餘惠, "戰國文字編" (2001), 福建人民出版社
- 滕壬生, "楚系簡帛文字編" (1995), 湖北教育出版社
- 王恩田, "陶文字典" (2007), 齊魯書社
- 王 輝, "秦文字編" (2015), 中華書局
- 吳良寶, "先秦貨幣文字編" (2006), 福建人民出版社
- 許慎, "說文解字注" (1985), 黎明文化事業股份有限公司
- 許慎, "說文解字" (2006), 中華書局
- 徐在國, "隸定古文疏證" (2002), 安徽大學出版社
- 徐在國, "傳抄古文字編" (2006), 線裝書局
- 徐正考, "漢代銅器銘文文字編" (2005), 吉林大學出版社
- 張守中, "包山楚簡文字編" (1996), 文物出版社
- 張湧泉, "敦煌俗字研究" (1996), 上海教育出版社
- 張湧泉, "漢語俗字研究" (2010), 商務印書館
