본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparing the lexical complexity in high school EFL students’ writing based on language ability

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study investigates whether and how high school students with different English abilities differ in the lexical complexity of their English writing. The participants were 106 second-year high school students, who were divided into two topic groups for an argumentative writing assignment in English. Each topic group consisted of students selected from three classes, who were divided into two ability groups (i.e., higher-ability & lower-ability) based on their scores in the National United Achievement Tests (NUAT). The participants’ lexical complexity was measured using a web-based Lexical Complexity Analyzer. The results showed that there was a significant difference between ability groups in some limited complexity indices and this difference varied in a limited way according to topic. In addition, few relationships were found between language ability and values of complexity indices but significant correlations were found among most of the complexity values themselves. The conclusion is that the lexical complexity in high school students’ writings can be different as a function of language ability but this difference is limited to some features only and can be affected by the writing topic. Some recommendations are suggested for further research.

Abstract

This study investigates whether and how high school students with different English abilities differ in the lexical complexity of their English writing. The participants were 106 second-year high school students, who were divided into two topic groups for an argumentative writing assignment in English. Each topic group consisted of students selected from three classes, who were divided into two ability groups (i.e., higher-ability & lower-ability) based on their scores in the National United Achievement Tests (NUAT). The participants’ lexical complexity was measured using a web-based Lexical Complexity Analyzer. The results showed that there was a significant difference between ability groups in some limited complexity indices and this difference varied in a limited way according to topic. In addition, few relationships were found between language ability and values of complexity indices but significant correlations were found among most of the complexity values themselves. The conclusion is that the lexical complexity in high school students’ writings can be different as a function of language ability but this difference is limited to some features only and can be affected by the writing topic. Some recommendations are suggested for further research.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. Ai, H., "A web-based system for automatic measurement of lexical complexity", 27th Annual Symposium of the Computer Assisted Language Consortium (CALICO-10) (2010)
  2. Bacha, N. N., "Writing evaluation: What can analytic versus holistic scoring tell us?", System, 29(3), pp.371~383 (2001)
  3. 배지영, "The Study of the Latent Structure of Linguistic Features in Korean College Students’ L2 Argumentative Writings", 영어교과교육, 17(3), pp.1~22 (2018), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  4. 배지영, "Genre-based Analysis of Lexical Complexity in L2 College Students’ Academic Writing", 언어과학, 25(1), pp.289~314 (2018), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  5. Bisson, M., "The role of repeated exposure to multimodal input in incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary", Language Learning, 64(4), pp.855~877 (2014)
  6. Bulté, B., "Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity", Journal of Second Language Writing, 26(4), pp.42~65 (2014)
  7. Bram Bulté, "Investigating the interrelationship between rated L2 proficiency and linguistic complexity in L2 speech", System, 91, pp.102246~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  8. Yi-chen Chen, "Assessing the lexical richness of figurative expressions in Taiwanese EFL learners’ writing", Assessing Writing, 43, pp.100414~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  9. Crossley, S. A., "Predicting second language writing proficiency:The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication", Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2), pp.115~135 (2012)
  10. Crossley, S. A., "Examining lexical development in second language learners : An approximate replication of Salsbury, Crossley & McNamara(2011)", Language Teaching, 52(3), pp.385~405 (2019)
  11. Dahlen, K., "Rehearsal and aptitude in foreign vocabulary learning", The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), pp.902~916 (2013)
  12. Dewi, R., "Lexical complexity in the introductions of undergraduate students’research articles", Exposure Journal, 6(2), pp.161~172 (2017)
  13. Eckerth, J., "The effects of word exposure frequency and elaboration of word processing on incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading", Language Teaching Research, 16(2), pp.227~252 (2012)
  14. Elgort, I., "Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language", Language Learning, 61(2), pp.367~413 (2011)
  15. Engber, C. A., "The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), pp.139~155 (1995)
  16. Folse, K., "The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention", TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), pp.273~293 (2006)
  17. Ghodadi, M., "Short-term and long-term effects of incidental vocabulary acquisition and instructed vocabulary teaching", International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(4), pp.212~218 (2016)
  18. Ginting, S. A., "Lexical complexity on descriptive writing of Indonesian male and female EFL learners", International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(3), pp.297~302 (2018)
  19. Grant, L., "Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.123~145 (2000)
  20. Gregori-Signesa, C., "Analysing lexical density and lexical diversity in university students’ written discourse", Social and Behavioral Sciences, 198, pp.546~556 (2015)
  21. He, L., "Topical knowledge and ESL writing", Language Testing, 29(3), pp.443~464 (2012)
  22. 황은경, "Analysis of Lexical Complexity in Korean EFL Students’ Narrative Writing", 영어교과교육, 12(3), pp.161~180 (2013), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  23. Indah , R . N ., "Critical thinking , writing performance and topic familiarity of Indonesian EFL learners", Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(2), pp.229~236 (2017)
  24. Jarvis, S., "Capturing the diversity in lexical diversity", Language Learning, 63(1), pp.87~106 (2013)
  25. Ji, X., "Topic effects on writing performance: What do students and their writings tell us?", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 8(1), pp.23~38 (2011)
  26. Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing: a developmental perspective, "Johansson, V.", 61~79, pp.Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics and Phonetics Working Papers, 53 (2008)
  27. Johnson, M. D., "Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis", Journal of Second Language Writing, 37, pp.13~38 (2017)
  28. Johnson, M. D., "Vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary use in second language writing", TESOL Journal, 7(3), pp.700~715 (2016)
  29. Kalantari, R., "Lexical complexity development from dynamic systems theory perspective : Lexical density, diversity, and sophistication", International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), pp.1~18 (2017)
  30. Kathpalia, S., "Metaphorical competence in ESL student writing", RELC Journal, 42(3), pp.273~290 (2011)
  31. Khoii, R., "Memorization versus semantic mapping in L2 vocabulary acquisition", ELT Journal, 67(2), pp.199~209 (2013)
  32. Kieffer, M. J., "Knowledge of words, knowledge about words : Dimensions of vocabulary in first and second language learners in sixth grade", Reading and Writing, 25, pp.347~373 (2012)
  33. 김지영, "Predicting L2 Writing Proficiency Using Linguistic Complexity Measures: A Corpus-Based Study", 영어교육, 69(4), pp.27~51 (2014), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  34. 김성애, "Comparing the Writings and Attitudes of High School EFL Students by Proficiency Levels", 영어교과교육, 18(4), pp.47~72 (2019), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  35. 김성애, "Effects of Topic and Source Text on the Lexical Proficiency and Syntactic Complexity of High School Students’ Writing", 영어교육연구, 32(4), pp.67~88 (2020), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
  36. 김성애, "Investigating Korean High School Students’ Use of English Connectives in Argumentative Writing", Foreign Languages Education, 28(1), pp.1~29 (2021), 한국외국어교육학회[DOI]
  37. Kyle, K., "Automatically assessing lexical sophistication : Indices, tools, findings, and application", TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), pp.757~786 (2015)
  38. Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use : Lexical richness in L2 written production", Applied Linguistics, 16(3), pp.307~322 (1995)
  39. Laufer, B., "Incidental vocabulary acquisition : The effects of task type, word occurrence and their combination", Language Teaching Research, 15(4), pp.391~411 (2011)
  40. Lu, X., "The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives", The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), pp.190~208 (2012)
  41. McCarthy, P. M., "vocd : A theoretical and empirical evaluation", Language Testing, 24(4), pp.459~488 (2007)
  42. McNamara, D. S., "Linguistic features of writing quality", Written Communication, 27(1), pp.57~86 (2010)
  43. Nation, I. S. P., "Learning vocabulary in another language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  44. Norris, J. M., "Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA : The case of complexity", Applied Linguistics, 30(4), pp.555~578 (2009)
  45. Pallotti, G., "A simple view of linguistic complexity", Second Language Research, 31(1), pp.117~134 (2014)
  46. 박수경, "Lexical Analysis of Korean University Students’ Narrative and Argumentative Essays", 영어교육, 68(3), pp.131~157 (2013), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  47. Read, J., "Assessing vocabulary" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  48. Read, J., "Research in teaching vocabulary", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, pp.146~161 (2004)
  49. Salimi, A., "The effects of strategic planning and topic familiarity on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ written performance in TBLT", Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(11), pp.2308~2315 (2012)
  50. Vermeer, A., "Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data", Language Testing, 17(1), pp.65~83 (2000)
  51. Verspoor, M., "A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), pp.239~263 (2012)
  52. Vo, S., "Use of lexical features in non-native academic writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, pp.1~12 (2019)
  53. Weigle, S. C., "Assessing writing" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  54. Yang, W., "Rote memorization of vocabulary and vocabulary development", English Language Teaching, 4(4), pp.61~64 (2011)
  55. Weiwei Yang, "The effect of topic familiarity on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency of second language writing", Applied Linguistics Review, 11(1), pp.79~108 (2020), Walter de Gruyter GmbH[DOI]
  56. Yoon, H. -J., "The linguistic development of students of English as a second language in two written genres", TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), pp.275~301 (2016)
  57. Yu, G., "Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances", Applied Linguistics, 31(2), pp.236~259 (2010)
  58. Zheng, Y., "The complex, dynamic development of L2 lexical use : A longitudinal study on Chinese learners of English", System, 56, pp.40~53 (2016)
  59. Bi Zhou, "Exploring Topic Effect on Syntactic Complexity of English Writings", Higher Education Studies, 9(3), pp.98~ (2019), Canadian Center of Science and Education[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)