본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기초지방자치단체 외국인주민 인권증진 조례의 비교와 관련 실태조사에 나타난 문화적 다양성의 가치

Value of the Cultural Diversity Shown in the Comparison of the Ordinances on the Promotion of Human Rights of Foreign Residents of Basic Local Governments and the Relevant Fact-Finding Survey

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study argues that primary local governments in Korea should secure cultural diversity by promoting their human rights while trying to attract foreign residents and integrate them into existing society as a viable alternative to overcome the population decline crisis. A study on the establishment of a basic plan for the promotion of human rights of foreign residents in Ansan City in 2015, which was produced with the same purpose, explains well that there are differences in the perception of foreign residents according to their status of stay, gender, age, country of origin, and period of residence. However, this research report has limitations in that it did not sufficiently specify a regional-specific policy for pursuing cultural diversity. This study compares the contents of ordinances for the promotion of human rights at the level of basic local governments that can derive regional-specific alternatives to contribute to the policy initiative of local governments to overcome the local extinction crisis by attracting foreign residents and maximizing social integration, and critically analyzes the 2015 Ansan City Basic Plan Research for the Promotion of Human Rights of Foreign Residents in Ansan City, which corresponds to a precedent. To this end, Chapter 2 compares the contents of seven ordinances, focusing on Gwangsan-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City, and Ansan City, Gyeonggi-do, which regulate the establishment and operation of the Human Rights Promotion Center for foreign residents. In addition, Chapter 3 is expected to have a positive impact on the establishment of related basic plans for other municipalities, such as Gwangsan-gu, Gwangju, which can become latecomers by critically analyzing previous studies. Finally, this study emphasizes that the policies that can solve human rights problems of foreign residents, which are perceived as an obstacle to harmony with indigenous people, ultimately rely on social consensus with indigenous people regarding cultural diversity, and looks forward to follow-up studies for this research.

Abstract

This study argues that primary local governments in Korea should secure cultural diversity by promoting their human rights while trying to attract foreign residents and integrate them into existing society as a viable alternative to overcome the population decline crisis. A study on the establishment of a basic plan for the promotion of human rights of foreign residents in Ansan City in 2015, which was produced with the same purpose, explains well that there are differences in the perception of foreign residents according to their status of stay, gender, age, country of origin, and period of residence. However, this research report has limitations in that it did not sufficiently specify a regional-specific policy for pursuing cultural diversity. This study compares the contents of ordinances for the promotion of human rights at the level of basic local governments that can derive regional-specific alternatives to contribute to the policy initiative of local governments to overcome the local extinction crisis by attracting foreign residents and maximizing social integration, and critically analyzes the 2015 Ansan City Basic Plan Research for the Promotion of Human Rights of Foreign Residents in Ansan City, which corresponds to a precedent. To this end, Chapter 2 compares the contents of seven ordinances, focusing on Gwangsan-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City, and Ansan City, Gyeonggi-do, which regulate the establishment and operation of the Human Rights Promotion Center for foreign residents. In addition, Chapter 3 is expected to have a positive impact on the establishment of related basic plans for other municipalities, such as Gwangsan-gu, Gwangju, which can become latecomers by critically analyzing previous studies. Finally, this study emphasizes that the policies that can solve human rights problems of foreign residents, which are perceived as an obstacle to harmony with indigenous people, ultimately rely on social consensus with indigenous people regarding cultural diversity, and looks forward to follow-up studies for this research.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. "안산 ‘아이 낳고 키우기 좋은 도시’ 실현 올인" (2024)[URL]
  2. 중앙부처·지자체 외국인주민 현황 및 관련정책, "김경례", 광주여성가족재단, ~ (2023)
  3. "상호문화시대의 과제, 안산의 인구 최근의 특징(1)" (2024)[URL]
  4. "외국인 2만명시대 앞둔 '인권도시' 광주 뭘 해야하나" (2016)[URL]
  5. 안산시 외국인주민 인권증진 기본계획 수립 연구용역, "송도용", 한양대학교 산학협력단, ~ (2015)
  6. "광주 외국인증가율 특·광역시 2위, 20~30대·광산구 집중" (2023)[URL]
  7. "광산구, ‘외국인 주민 지원 시책위원회’ 개최" (2024)[URL]
  8. "국내거주 외국인수 213만 명, 지역별 외국인 주민 변동 통계" (2023)[URL]
  9. "광주광역시 광산구 외국인주민 인권증진에 관한 조례", ~
  10. "광주광역시 남구 외국인주민 인권 증진에 관한 조례", ~
  11. "경기도 외국인 인권지원에 관한 조례", ~
  12. "목포시 외국인주민 인권 증진 및 지원에 관한 조례", ~
  13. "서울특별시 송파구 거주외국인 인권 및 처우증진에 관한 조례", ~
  14. "성남시 외국인주민 인권 증진에 관한 조례", ~
  15. "안산시 외국인주민 인권 증진에 관한 조례", ~
  16. "영암군 외국인주민 인권 증진 및 지원 조례", ~
  17. "제주특별자치도 외국인주민 인권 보장 및 증진 조례", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)