English Null Complementizer as a Cliticand Intonational Phrase Boundary
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
The ECP account for the distribution of the English null complementizer in that-less clauses does not work, because the notion of government is eliminated in the minimalist framework. Several attempts have been made to explain the distribution of the null complementizer in English, without appealing to the notion of government. This article is an attempt to explain the distribution of null complementizers with the PF approach, assuming that a null com- plementizer is a kind of clitic, which is attached to the preceding host and that the intonational phrase boundary blocks cliticization, even though the null clitic and the preceding host are adjacent. In this paper, I also show the interaction of the presence of an adjunct and cliticization. With the presence of an adjunct, intonational phrasings could change and this gives an effect on the cliticization of a null complementizer.
참고문헌 (22)
- "Two types of Locality", pp.527~577 (1987)
- "Grammar of Spoken and Written English" (2000)
- "On the Nature of the Syntax-phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related phenomena" (2001), Amsterdam: Elsevier Science
- "PF Merger in Scandinavian:Stylistic Fronting and Object Shift", 68, pp.75~115 (2001)
- "On the Distribution of Null Complementizers", 34, pp.527~546 (2003)
- "Essays toward Realistic Syntax" (1979), Noit Amrofer
- "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- "Minimalist Inquiries : Step by Step-Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Haward Lasnik", pp.89~115 (2000), Cambridge, MIT Press
- "Evidence against ECP Accounts of the That-t Effect", pp.557~561 (1993)
- "Clauses without Complementizers: Finite IP-complementation : in English", 14, pp.197~220 (1997)
- "English Cliticization and Intonational Phrases", 9(2), pp.429~465 (1999)
- "Remarks on the PF-Meger Analysis of the Null Complementizer in English", 14(2), pp.277~287 (2004)
- "An Introduction to English Language: Word, Sound and Sentence" (2004), Palgrave
- "Some Optimality Principles of Sentence Pronunciation : Is the Best Good Enough?", pp.337~383 (1998), The MIT Press
- Pesetsky D, "T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences In A Life in Language", pp.355~426 (2001), MIT
- Pullum, G. K, "The Morpholexical Nature of English to-Contraction", 73(1), pp.79~102 (1997)
- Quirk, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985)
- Radford, Andrew, "The Syntax of Clauses Essex Research Reports", Vol. 33 (2000)
- Radford, Andrew, "Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Roussou, Anna, "C, T, and the Subject: That-t phenomena revisited", 112, pp.13~52 (2002)
- Selkirk, "The Relation between Sound and Structure", pho(logy and syntax) (1984), MIT Press
- Stowell,Tim 1981, "Doctoral Dissertation", MIT Press
