본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: To determine and compare the frequency distribution of various arch shapes in ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia and to investigate the morphological differences of arch form between these two ethnic groups. Methods: We examined 120 ethnic Malay study models (60 maxillary, 60 mandibular) and 129 Malaysian Aboriginal study models (66 maxillary, 63mandibular). We marked 18 buccal tips and incisor line angles on each model, and digitized them using 2-dimensional coordinate system. Dental arches were classified as square, ovoid, or tapered by printing the scanned images and superimposing Orthoform arch templates on them. Results: Th e most common maxillary arch shape in both ethnic groups was ovoid, as was the most common mandibular arch shape among ethnic Malay females. The rarest arch shape was square. Chi-square tests, indicated that only the distribution of the mandibular arch shape was signifi cantly different between groups (p = 0.040). However, when compared using independent t-tests, there was no difference in the mean value of arch width between groups. Arch shape distribution was not different between genders of either ethnic group, except for the mandibular arch of ethnic Malays. Conclusions: Ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines have similar dental arch dimensions and shapes.

Abstract

Objective: To determine and compare the frequency distribution of various arch shapes in ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia and to investigate the morphological differences of arch form between these two ethnic groups. Methods: We examined 120 ethnic Malay study models (60 maxillary, 60 mandibular) and 129 Malaysian Aboriginal study models (66 maxillary, 63mandibular). We marked 18 buccal tips and incisor line angles on each model, and digitized them using 2-dimensional coordinate system. Dental arches were classified as square, ovoid, or tapered by printing the scanned images and superimposing Orthoform arch templates on them. Results: Th e most common maxillary arch shape in both ethnic groups was ovoid, as was the most common mandibular arch shape among ethnic Malay females. The rarest arch shape was square. Chi-square tests, indicated that only the distribution of the mandibular arch shape was signifi cantly different between groups (p = 0.040). However, when compared using independent t-tests, there was no difference in the mean value of arch width between groups. Arch shape distribution was not different between genders of either ethnic group, except for the mandibular arch of ethnic Malays. Conclusions: Ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines have similar dental arch dimensions and shapes.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. McLaughlin RP, "Systemized orthodontic treatment mechanics" (2001), Mosby
  2. Rudge SJ, "Dental arch analysis: arch form. A review of the literature", Eur J Orthod, 3, pp.279~284 (1981)
  3. Cassidy KM, "Genetic infl uence on dental arch form in orthodontic patients", Angle Orthod, 68, pp.445~454 (1998)
  4. Eguchi S, "Genetic contribution to dental arch size variation in Australian twins", Arch Oral Biol, 49, pp.1015~1024 (2004)
  5. Nojima K, "A comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms", Angle Orthod, 71, pp.195~200 (2001)
  6. Lavelle CL, "Dental arches in various ethnic groups", Angle Orthod, 41, pp.293~299 (1971)
  7. Burris BG, "Maxillary arch size and shape in American blacks and whites", Angle Orthod, 70, pp.297~302 (2000)
  8. Kook YA, "Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126, pp.680~686 (2004)
  9. Ling JY, "Dental arch widths of Southern Chinese", Angle Orthod, 79, pp.54~63 (2009)
  10. Lara-Carrillo E, "Dental arch morphology of Mazahua and mestizo teenagers from central Mexico", Braz J Oral Sci, 8, pp.92~96 (2009)
  11. 장갑수, "한국인과 이집트인의 치열궁 형태 비교", 대한치과교정학회지, 40(5), pp.334~341 (2010), 대한치과교정학회
  12. Nicholas C, "The Orang Asli and The Contest for Resources: Indigenous Politics, Development and Identity in Peninsular Malaysia, Copenhagen", IWGIA and COAC, ~ (2000)
  13. Nicholas C, "Healthcare in Malaysia: The Dyna mics of Provision, Financing and Access" (2007)
  14. Khin MT, "The maxillary arch and its relationship to cephalometric landmarks of selected Malay ethnic group", Mal J Med Sci, 12, pp.29~38 (2005)
  15. Banabilh SM, "Dental arch shape and size in Malay schoolchildren with Class II malocclusion", Aust Orthod J, 22, pp.99~103 (2006)
  16. Hussein KW, "Variations in tooth size and arch dimensions in Malay school children", Aust Orthod J, 25, pp.163~168 (2009)
  17. Barrett MJ, "Size of dental arches in a tribe of Central Australian aborigines", J Dent Res, 44, pp.912~920 (1965)
  18. Tibana RH, "Changes in dental arch measurements of young adults with normal occlu sion--a longitudinal study", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.618~623 (2004)
  19. Radzi Z, "Validation of cone beam CT scan for measurement of palatal depth in study casts", Int Fed Med Biol Eng (IFMBE) Proceedings, 21, pp.758~761 (2008)
  20. Jin Y, "Supragingival calculus: formation and control", Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 13, pp.426~441 (2002)
  21. Caglar E, "Dental erosion among children in an Istanbul public school", J Dent Child, 72, pp.5~9 (2005)
  22. Esclassan R, "Dental caries, tooth wear and diet in an adult medieval (12th-14th century) population from mediterranean France", Arch Oral Biol, 54, pp.287~297 (2009)
  23. Nishijima K, "Occlusal tooth wear in female F344", N rats with aging, 2007, pp.52, 844~849
  24. Braun S, "The form of the human dental arch", Angle Orthod, 68, pp.29~36 (1998)
  25. Kook YA, "Evaluation of the anterior and posterior overjet for clinical arch form using 3-dimensional models", Angle Orthod, 79, pp.495~501 (2009)
  26. 임미영, "석고 모형, 레이저 스캔 디지털 모형, 콘 빔 CT 영상 간의 모형 분석 계측치 비교", 대한치과교정학회지, 39(1), pp.6~17 (2009), 대한치과교정학회
  27. Kim BI, "Comparison of overjet among 3 arch types in normal occlusion", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.e253~e260 (2011)
  28. Anwar N, "Variability of arch forms in various vertical facial patterns", J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 20, pp.565~570 (2010)
  29. Abdullah F, "Inter-incisor, inter-canine, inter-molar width of adult Malays", 석사, pp.2007
  30. Harris EF, "A longitudinal study of arch size and form in untreated adults", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 111, pp.419~427 (1997)
  31. Nie Q, "A comparison of dental arch forms between Class II Division 1 and normal occlusion asse s sed by euclidean distance matrix analysis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.528~535 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of mandibular arch forms of Korean and Vietnamese patients by using facial axis points on three-dimensional models국윤아, Jae Hyun Park, Kil-jun Lee, Mohamed Bayome, Vu Thi Thu Trang, Yong Kim대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2013 · 제43권 제6호Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between dental and basal arch forms in normal occlusion국윤아, 김곤태, 김광유, 김윤지, 백승학, 한성호, Mohamed Bayome대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2011 · 제41권 제4호Analysis of dimensions and shapes of maxillary and mandibular dental arch in Korean young adults박수정, 송재원, 안수진, 이석원, 이성복, 장세훈대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2017 · 제9권 제5호The study of essential factors that affect mandibular dental arch forms by cluster analysis김지연, 박영석, 신제원, 주성숙, Aiko Morishita, Chizuko Inui-Yamamoto, Chun-Ying An, Katsura Ueda, Michiko Nakatsuka, Shunji Kumabe, Yasutomo Iwai대한구강해부학회 · 대한구강해부학회지2013 · 제34권 제1호한국인 정상교합자의 하악 치열궁 형태국윤아, 김성훈, 김정기, 모성서, 윤영국, 차경석, 태기출대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2004 · 제34권 제6호New classification of lingual arch form in normal occlusion using three dimensional virtual models국윤아, 백승학, Jae Hyun Park, Jeong Woo Lee, Kyung Hee Park, Mohamed Bayome대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2015 · 제45권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)