Due Process and Right to Counsel on the Investigation Process in Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is, first, to describe the main schemes of the right to counsel in Japan since the second word war. There are mainly three schemes of the criminal defense in Japan. First is the Court Appointed Attorney scheme which the court has responsibility to nominate the attorney to the defendant when they cannot hire the defender by themselves. Thorough the judicial reform the target of this scheme has been expanded from the defendant of the trial stage to the defendant of the post-indictment stage. Second is the Criminal Suspect Defense Aid which is to support the defendant in the post-arrest stage by the bar association. Third is the Duty Attorney scheme which was developed by the attorneys as pro-bono work for providing the defender to the suspects in the pre-trial stage. Second, this paper explains the reason and background of the development. There are two main reasons: one is the attorney's pro-bono work in the early stage of post-arrest proceedings and the other one is the judicial reform movement since 2000. Third, this paper summarizes the characteristics of the Japanese situation and point out some important issues to be solved as soon as possible. Finally, the author introduces a new movement on the defensive work, rehabilitationoriented defense, which is different from the traditional adversarial model.
Abstract
This paper is, first, to describe the main schemes of the right to counsel in Japan since the second word war. There are mainly three schemes of the criminal defense in Japan. First is the Court Appointed Attorney scheme which the court has responsibility to nominate the attorney to the defendant when they cannot hire the defender by themselves. Thorough the judicial reform the target of this scheme has been expanded from the defendant of the trial stage to the defendant of the post-indictment stage. Second is the Criminal Suspect Defense Aid which is to support the defendant in the post-arrest stage by the bar association. Third is the Duty Attorney scheme which was developed by the attorneys as pro-bono work for providing the defender to the suspects in the pre-trial stage. Second, this paper explains the reason and background of the development. There are two main reasons: one is the attorney's pro-bono work in the early stage of post-arrest proceedings and the other one is the judicial reform movement since 2000. Third, this paper summarizes the characteristics of the Japanese situation and point out some important issues to be solved as soon as possible. Finally, the author introduces a new movement on the defensive work, rehabilitationoriented defense, which is different from the traditional adversarial model.
참고문헌 (11)
- 特集, "刑事司法改革とこれからの刑事弁護", 季刊刑事弁護, (40), pp.34~ (2004)
- 竹之内明, "刑事司法改革と日弁連刑事弁護センターの課題", 季刊刑事弁護, (53), pp.8~ (2008)
- 後藤, "現代の刑事弁護3巻 刑事弁護の歴史と展望" (2014), 第一法規
- 葛野尋之, "刑事司法改革と刑事弁護" (2016), 現代人文社
- 辻本典央, "刑事弁護の理論" (2017), 成文堂
- 大出良知, "刑事弁護の展開と刑事訴訟" (2019), 現代人文社
- 岡慎一, "国費による弁護制度と刑事弁護の変容", 法律時報, 74(7), pp.30~ (2002)
- Foote, Daniel H., "Confessions and the right to silence in Japan", Georgia Journal of International Law and Comparative Law, 21, pp.415~ (1991)
- Suess, David A., "Paternalism versus pugnacity: The right to counsel in Japan and the United States", Indiana Law Journal, 72, pp.291~ (1996)
- "Prosecution of Carlos Ghosn exposes flawed criminal justice system"[URL]
- 日本弁護士連合会, "弁護士白書" (2018)
