본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

4세대 전쟁에 대한 합리적인 적용방향 연구-한반도의 여건을 고려하여-

Study on Reasonable Approach of Fourth Generation Warfare in the Korean Peninsula

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류군사학

초록

There is no doubt that the Fourth Generation Warfare(4GW) is a useful theory for explaining the new aspects of modern warfare and seeking countermeasures. On the other hand, there is also a theoretical limit. Therefore, in order to apply this theory reasonably, we should recognize the part clearly that we can accept by analyzing the fourth generation war theory considering our condition rather than accepting it uncritically. And we should complement readiness condition selectively. The term `Fourth Generation War` itself does not clearly express the reality of the threat and may be interpreted in various meanings, so that leads to unnecessary controversy. Therefore, we examined the characteristics and examples of the fourth generation war and its connection with the conditions of the Korean peninsula, and the connection between the concept of the fourth generation war and the concept of military strategy in North Korea. Based on the results, we have clearly defined the meaning of the Fourth Generation War as "insurgency" and judged that it is not appropriate to use the term "fourth generation warfare" directly. In addition, This paper suggests the following directions of application for conduct of counter insurgency(COIN). First, it is necessary to build a database in relating to north Korean political, economic and social conditions, geography, culture, major cities and facilities, residents` elements, important persons, etc. Second, we should bring up special forces exactly corresponding to characteristics of counter insurgency, because forces committed to stability missions are almost augmented or activated. Third, measures should be taken to support insurgency against the north Korean regime in addition to insurgency against the ROK armed forces. Fourth, we should prepare against insurgency during not only regular war, but also sudden change in north Korea. But we must not forget that the most important threats of nK are asymmetric and regular warfare power. So preparation for counter insurgency must be conducted at the sametime while continuing the technical approach based on the concept of NCW.

Abstract

There is no doubt that the Fourth Generation Warfare(4GW) is a useful theory for explaining the new aspects of modern warfare and seeking countermeasures. On the other hand, there is also a theoretical limit. Therefore, in order to apply this theory reasonably, we should recognize the part clearly that we can accept by analyzing the fourth generation war theory considering our condition rather than accepting it uncritically. And we should complement readiness condition selectively. The term `Fourth Generation War` itself does not clearly express the reality of the threat and may be interpreted in various meanings, so that leads to unnecessary controversy. Therefore, we examined the characteristics and examples of the fourth generation war and its connection with the conditions of the Korean peninsula, and the connection between the concept of the fourth generation war and the concept of military strategy in North Korea. Based on the results, we have clearly defined the meaning of the Fourth Generation War as "insurgency" and judged that it is not appropriate to use the term "fourth generation warfare" directly. In addition, This paper suggests the following directions of application for conduct of counter insurgency(COIN). First, it is necessary to build a database in relating to north Korean political, economic and social conditions, geography, culture, major cities and facilities, residents` elements, important persons, etc. Second, we should bring up special forces exactly corresponding to characteristics of counter insurgency, because forces committed to stability missions are almost augmented or activated. Third, measures should be taken to support insurgency against the north Korean regime in addition to insurgency against the ROK armed forces. Fourth, we should prepare against insurgency during not only regular war, but also sudden change in north Korea. But we must not forget that the most important threats of nK are asymmetric and regular warfare power. So preparation for counter insurgency must be conducted at the sametime while continuing the technical approach based on the concept of NCW.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 국방부, "국방백서(Defense White Paper)" (2014), 국방부
  2. 야전교범 0, "지상군 기본교리" (2011), 육군본부
  3. 손석현, "대반란전 사례 연구" (2016), 국방부 군사편찬연구소
  4. Thomas X. Hammes, "21세기 전쟁 비대칭의 4세대 전쟁" (2011), 한국국방연구원
  5. 조한승, "4세대 전쟁의 이론과 실제: 분란전(insurgency) 평가를 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 50(1), pp.217~240 (2010), 한국국제정치학회
  6. 조한승, "전쟁의 삼위일체에 대한 4세대 전쟁 주창자들의 비판 고찰", 대한정치학회보, 17(3), pp.145~168 (2010), 대한정치학회
  7. 최한수, "4세대 전쟁의 한반도 적용 가능성 연구", 국방정책연구, 29(4), pp.113~149 (2014), 한국국방연구원
  8. 이수형, "4세대 전쟁의 등장과 한국의 대응방안: 비대칭 위협을 중심으로", 재단법인 21세기한국연구재단 학술대회 (2001), 21세기 한국연구재단
  9. 이수형, "9.11 뉴욕 테러와 21세기 국제분쟁의 새로운 유형: 제4세대전쟁, 네트전, 비대칭전쟁", 사회과학논총, 19 (2003), 사회과학연구소
  10. 김재엽, "제4세대 전쟁: 미래전과 한국 안보에 대한 함의", 신아세아, 17(1), pp.162~191 (2010), 신아시아연구소
  11. 장영호, "신(新) 개념의 전쟁유형 고찰과 한반도에의 적용방안: 비대칭전․제4세대전쟁․복합전을 중심으로", 한국동북아논총, 17(4), pp.249~270 (2012), 한국동북아학회
  12. 손경호, "한반도 “제4세대전쟁” 패러다임과 한국의 대응전략" (2012), 국방대학교
  13. 임은성, "한반도 “제4세대전쟁” 패러다임과 한국의 대응전략" (2012), 국방대학교
  14. 유명덕, "한반도 “제4세대전쟁” 패러다임과 한국의 대응전략" (2012), 국방대학교
  15. 신종태, "한반도에서의 대반란전 수행개념 연구", 한국군사학논총, 5(1), pp.107~129 (2016), 미래군사학회
  16. 크리스토퍼 L. 센터, "반란전의 근원(The Roots of Insurgency Warfare)", 미 Armor지 (2007)
  17. Rider, Bruce J., "이라크 전쟁의 목표, 수단, 방법 재조정 (Strategic Realignment–Ends, Ways, Means in Iraq)", 미 Parameters 지, (겨울) (2007)
  18. Lind, William S., "Marine Corps Gazette" (1989), Marine Corps Association
  19. Lind, William S., "Understanding Fourth Generation War", Military Review, 84(5) (2004), Combined Arms Center

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)