본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

<윌리엄 셰익스피어의 로미오+줄리엣>의 미디어와 소비문화

Media and Consumer Culture in Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Baz Luhrmann’s radical film William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet (1996) offers a stunning contemporary vision of Shakespearean play text. Luhrmann uses a variety of media forms and images from consumer culture to create very popular filmic productions, addressed to an up-to-date modern mass audience. William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet seems like a good example of post-modern pastiche, which puts together a plethora of allusions, copies, and intertextuality (the western movie, the gangster movie, the kung-fu pic, the urban thriller, crime-thriller, the action comedy, MTV, etc). He borrows the characteristics of many genres and styles and re-works these elements through his signature “Bazmark” style to make postmodern pastiche, in which the distinction between high and low art is collapsed and everything has equal value. In Luhrmann’s film, Shakespeare’s language becomes the source of advertising copy and a brand name. And the film, where sacred and profane exist in a dynamic balance, is so saturated with religious symbolism, that is intimately mingled with consumer culture. The mockery of a religion plays a clashing role in Luhrmann’s mise-en-scène, for the giant statues of Christ, Mary, and various saints compose a powerless group of silent onlookers to the violence in Verona, and for the film portrays religion as a media icon or a brand name or a just another commodity in post-modern consumer culture. To mix popular culture with elements of high culture, Luhrmann opens his film with a television news report that functions as the classical chorus, followed by the hasty progression of newspaper headlines concerning the “new mutiny” and “ancient grudge” between Capulets and Montagues. But Jean Baudrillard claimed that everything today is composed of simulacra of previously existing things. According to Baudrillard’s theory, the news on television is the hyperreal, though it seems to refer to something real; the news is a simulation designed to hold the attention of the viewer. In the circular frame where everything begins and ends with television news, the whole tragedy of Romeo and Juliet is presented as an event within the TV news. Luhrmann’s film can be read as a canonical example of iconoclasm, for it challenges to the Shakespearean canon and timeless, eternal values he represents. Though Luhrmann may try to make Shakespeare relevant to today’s society from a new contemporary innovative viewpoint, the practice of this film consequently seems to cast a doubt on Shakespearean icon of literary value and to destabilize the previously unshakeable stability of his authority. Luhrmann’s flamboyant cinematographic style, “Bazmark,” has positioned him as an innovative, creative auteur competing with High Culture Shakespeare within the domain of contemporary cultural milieu.

Abstract

Baz Luhrmann’s radical film William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet (1996) offers a stunning contemporary vision of Shakespearean play text. Luhrmann uses a variety of media forms and images from consumer culture to create very popular filmic productions, addressed t o an up-to-date modern mass audience.William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet seems like a good example of post-modern pastiche, which puts together a plethora of allusions, copies, and intertextuality (the western movie, the gangster movie, the kung-fu pic, the urban thriller, crime-thriller, the action comedy, MTV, etc). He borrows the characteristics of many genres and styles and re-works these elements through his signature “Bazmark” style to make postmodern pastiche, in which the distinction between high and low art is collapsed and everything has equal value. In Luhrmann’s film, Shakespeare’s language becomes the source of advertising copy and a brand name. And the film, where sacred and profane exist in a dynamic balance, is so saturated with religious symbolism, that is intimately mingled with consumer culture. The mockery of a religion plays a clashing role in Luhrmann’s mise-en-scène, for the giant statues of Christ, Mary, and various saints compose a powerless group of silent onlookers to the violence in Verona, and for the film portrays religion as a media icon or a brand name or a just another commodity in post-modern consumer culture. To mix popular culture with elements of high culture, Luhrmann opens his film with a television news report that functions as the classical chorus, followed by the hasty progression of newspaper headlines concerning the “new mutiny” and “ancient grudge” between Capulets and Montagues. But Jean Baudrillard claimed that everything today is composed of simulacra of previously existing things. According to Baudrillard’s theory, the news on television is the hyperreal, though it seems to refer to something real; the news is a simulation designed to hold the attention of the viewer. In the circular frame where everything begins and ends with television news, the whole tragedy of Romeo and Juliet is presented as an event within the TV news. Luhrmann’s film can be read as a canonical example of iconoclasm, for it challenges to the Shakespearean canon and timeless, eternal values he represents. Though Luhrmann may try to make Shakespeare relevant to today’s society from a new contemporary innovative viewpoint, the practice of this film consequently seems to cast a doubt on Shakespearean icon of literary value and to destabilize the previously unshakeable stability of his authority. Luhrmann’s flamboyant cinematographic style, “Bazmark,” has positioned him as an innovative, creative auteur competing with High Culture Shakespeare within the domain of contemporary cultural milieu.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Anderegg, Michael, "Shakespeare, The Movie, II: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, Video, and DVD", pp.56~71 (2003), Routledge
  2. Arroyo, José, "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang", Sight and Sound, 7(3), pp.6~9 (1997)
  3. Baudrillard, Jean, "Selected Writings" (1988), Polity
  4. Buchanan, Judith, "Shakespeare on Film. Essex" (2005), Pearson Education
  5. Cartmell, Deborah, "Reading and Screening Ophelia: 1948-1966", Shakespeare Yearbook, 8, pp.28~41 (1997)
  6. Coursen, Herbert R, "Shakespeare: The Two Traditions" (1999), AUP
  7. Debord Guy, "Society of the Spectacle" (1994), Zone Books
  8. Donaldson, Peter S, "Shakespeare after Mass Media", pp.59~82 (2002), Palgrave
  9. Featherstone, Mike, "Consumer Culture and Postmodernism" (1991), Sage
  10. Hamilton, Lucy, "Baz vs. The Bardolaters, Or Why William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet Deserves Another Look", Literature, 2000, pp.28(2), 118~124
  11. Hindle, Maurice, "Studying Shakespeare On Film" (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
  12. Hodgdon, Barbara, "Romeo and Juliet", pp.126~146 (2001), Palgrave
  13. Loehlin, James N, "Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle", pp.121~136 (2000), St. Martin’s
  14. Luhrmann, Baz, dir, "William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet", 20th Century Fox, ~ (2003)
  15. "William Shakespeare’s Romeo+and Juliet Review" (1996)[URL]
  16. Matthews, Peter, "William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet", Sight and Sound, 7(4), pp.54~55 (1997)
  17. "To be or not to be Postmodern: Shakespeare and Postmodernism" (2014)[URL]
  18. Rothwell, Kenneth S, "A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television" (1999), Cambridge UP
  19. Rutter, Carol Chillington, "The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film", pp.241~260 (2000), Cambridge UP
  20. "A ‘Harsh World’ of Soundbite Shakespeare: Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet (2000)" (2000)[URL]
  21. Walker, Elsie, "Pop Goes the Shakespeare: Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet", Literature, 2000, pp.28(2), 132~139

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)