인간성을 향한 아킬레우스의 분노의 여정: 필멸의 삶에서 불멸성으로
Achilles’ Wrathful Journey Toward Humanity: From Mortal Life to Immortality
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay examines the role Achilles’ wrath plays in his humanization process as well as his pursuit of immortality available only to mortal beings. Countering many critics’ assumption that Achilles becomes completely human when his wrath turns into compassion in his encounter with Priam, this essay argues that the change that takes place in the nature of his wrath because of his loss of Patroclus is much more significant in his humanization process than the ultimate dissolution of his wrath into compassion. Specifically, before Patroclus’ death, Achilles’ wrath targeted mainly toward Agamemnon is uncontrollable and relentless due to the insecure nature of his status as a demi-god. Although his wrath displayed toward Hector who has slain Patroclus looks similarly overpowering and irrepressible, its nature has fundamentally changed in that it is completely human. Patroclus’ death can bring about such a drastic and radical change in Achilles’ wrath as it serves as the occasion for his realization that the choice between a glorious yet short life and a dishonorable yet long life has never been his to make and that it will never be. This realization leads Achilles to choose to commit himself completely to his wrath. His wrath expressed in both “superhuman” and sub-human ways enables him to transcend norms and expectations of Iliadic culture as well as his own character, thereby making it possible for him to directly confront human mortality as it is without the shield of such concepts as timê or kleos. By thus wrestling with mortality through his wrath, Achilles tragically yet heroically defies the controlling power of his fate and aspires to true immortality which is not available to the gods in Olympus because of their immortal life.
Abstract
This essay examines the role Achilles’ wrath plays in his humanization process as well as his pursuit of immortality available only to mortal beings. Countering many critics’ assumption that Achilles becomes completely human when his wrath turns into compassion in his encounter with Priam, this essay argues that the change that takes place in the nature of his wrath because of his loss of Patroclus is much more significant in his humanization process than the ultimate dissolution of his wrath into compassion. Specifically, before Patroclus’ death, Achilles’ wrath targeted mainly toward Agamemnon is uncontrollable and relentless due to the insecure nature of his status as a demi-god. Although his wrath displayed toward Hector who has slain Patroclus looks similarly overpowering and irrepressible, its nature has fundamentally changed in that it is completely human. Patroclus’ death can bring about such a drastic and radical change in Achilles’ wrath as it serves as the occasion for his realization that the choice between a glorious yet short life and a dishonorable yet long life has never been his to make and that it will never be. This realization leads Achilles to choose to commit himself completely to his wrath. His wrath expressed in both “superhuman” and sub-human ways enables him to transcend norms and expectations of Iliadic culture as well as his own character, thereby making it possible for him to directly confront human mortality as it is without the shield of such concepts as timê or kleos. By thus wrestling with mortality through his wrath, Achilles tragically yet heroically defies the controlling power of his fate and aspires to true immortality which is not available to the gods in Olympus because of their immortal life.
참고문헌 (15)
- Arieti, James, "Achilles’ Guilt", The Classical Journal, 80(3), pp.193~203 (1985)
- Arvanitakis, Konstantinos I., "Psychoanalytic Scholia on the Homeric Epics", pp.3~25 (2015), Brill
- Basset, Samuel Eliot, "Achilles’ Treatment of Hector’s Body", Transactions and Proceddings of the American Philological Association, 64, pp.41~65 (1933)
- Clarke, Michael, "The Cambridge Companion to Homer", pp.74~90 (2004), Cambridge UP
- Clarke, W. M, "Achilles and Patroclus in Love", Hermes, 106(3), pp.381~396 (1978)
- Hammer, Dean, "Achilles as Vagabond: The Culture of Autonomy in the ‘Iliad", The Classical World, 90(5), pp.341~366 (1997)
- E. V. Rieu, "Homer. The Iliad" (2003), Penguin
- Jones, Peter, "The Iliad", pp.ix~xlvi (2003), Penguin
- Latacz, Joachim, "Bloom’s Guides to Homer’s The Iliad", pp.91~93 (2005), Chelsea House
- Lateiner, Donald, "The Cambridge Companion to Homer", pp.11~30 (2004), Cambridge UP
- Ledbetter, Grace M., "Achilles’ Self-Address: Iliad 16.7-19", The American Journal of Philology, 114(4), pp.481~491 (1993)
- Mills, Sophie, "Achilles, Patroclus and Parental Care in Some Homeric Similes", Greece & Rome, 47(1), pp.3~18 (2000)
- Nagler, Michael, "Spontaneity and Tradition: A Study in the Oral Art of Homer" (1974), U of California P
- Redfield, James, "Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector" (1975), U of Chicago P
- Vernant, Jean-Pierre, "Mortals and Immortals", pp.50~74 (1991), Princeton UP
