요한복음 9장의 재판 구조를 통한 죄 이해
John's Understanding of Sin through a Trial Structure in John 9
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After Jesus healed the man who had been blind from birth on the Sabbath, the Pharisees expelled the man from the synagogue(9:22) convicting him of violating the Sabbath tradition through a trial. The author of the Gospel of John discloses the difference in the point of view of sin between the Jews and Jesus throughout the event. This difference is exhibited by a double judgment in dealing with the essence of the sin: The first trial is held by the Jews, and the second trial is conducted by Jesus. In order to approach the author's viewpoint of sin, this article interpreted John 9 through the analysis of the forensic genre of rhetoric in the double judgment structure. The Gospel's viewpoint of sin is not understood as a concept of ethical action, but is rather interpreted as a relationship with Jesus. To the Jews, in dealing with the man who had been blind from birth, their action is understood as a punishment for a crime, but to Jesus, the healing was intended to manifest the work of God. This difference in understanding sin clearly presents opposing arguments with regard to the Sabbath law. The majority of the Pharisees estimate Jesus’ healing ministry as a sin in terms of action. But a minority of the Pharisees and the blind man confer a legality to Jesus’ ministry in terms of relationship between the God and Jesus. The problem of sin reaches its climax when Jesus declares his own identity as the Son of Man (9:37). The author, who emphasizes “seeing” and “not seeing” throughout the whole judgment, depicts the man born blind as one who believes in Jesus as the Son of Man while disclosing the sin of the Jews who do not see Jesus. The Jews have eyes but they cannot see Jesus as the Son of Man. The sin in the Gospel is not-believing in Jesus as the Son of Man. Therefore, the Gospel of John does not explain the sin in terms of an ethical action but in terms of a relationship with Jesus.
Abstract
After Jesus healed the man who had been blind from birth on the Sabbath, the Pharisees expelled the man from the synagogue(9:22) convicting him of violating the Sabbath tradition through a trial. The author of the Gospel of John discloses the difference in the point of view of sin between the Jews and Jesus throughout the event. This difference is exhibited by a double judgment in dealing with the essence of the sin: The first trial is held by the Jews, and the second trial is conducted by Jesus. In order to approach the author's viewpoint of sin, this article interpreted John 9 through the analysis of the forensic genre of rhetoric in the double judgment structure. The Gospel's viewpoint of sin is not understood as a concept of ethical action, but is rather interpreted as a relationship with Jesus. To the Jews, in dealing with the man who had been blind from birth, their action is understood as a punishment for a crime, but to Jesus, the healing was intended to manifest the work of God. This difference in understanding sin clearly presents opposing arguments with regard to the Sabbath law. The majority of the Pharisees estimate Jesus’ healing ministry as a sin in terms of action. But a minority of the Pharisees and the blind man confer a legality to Jesus’ ministry in terms of relationship between the God and Jesus. The problem of sin reaches its climax when Jesus declares his own identity as the Son of Man (9:37). The author, who emphasizes “seeing” and “not seeing” throughout the whole judgment, depicts the man born blind as one who believes in Jesus as the Son of Man while disclosing the sin of the Jews who do not see Jesus. The Jews have eyes but they cannot see Jesus as the Son of Man. The sin in the Gospel is not-believing in Jesus as the Son of Man. Therefore, the Gospel of John does not explain the sin in terms of an ethical action but in terms of a relationship with Jesus.
참고문헌 (45)
- C.H. Dodd, "The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel", pp.345~ (1968), Cambridge University Press
- Merrill C. Tenney, "The Gospel of John", pp.24~25 (1981), Zondervan Publishing House
- Martin Warner, "The Bible as Rhetoric: Studies in Biblical Persuasion and Credibility" (1990), Rouhedge
- Leon Morris, "The Gospel according to John (NICNT)", pp.208~ (1971), WM. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co
- Raymond E. Brown, "The Gospel according to John (i-xii)" (1966), Doubleday
- Loren L. Johns, "The Signs as Witnesses in the Fourth Gospel: Reexamining the evidence", CBQ, 56, pp.522~524 (1994)
- Craig A. Evans, "Images of Christ: Ancient and Modern", pp.56~ (1997), Sheffield Academic Press
- Andrew T. Lincoln, "Truth on Trial: The Lawsuit Motif in the Fourth Gospel" (2000), Hendrickson Publishers, Inc
- Martin Asiedu-Preprah, "Johannine Sabbath Conflicts as Juridical Controversy: An Exegetical Study of John 5 and 9:1-10:21", Doctor, pp.2000
- Jerome H. Neyrey, "An Ideology of Revolt: John's Christology in Social-science Perspective", pp.17~18 (1988), Fortress Press
- Jerome H. Neyrey, "The Gospel of John (NCBC)" (2007), Cambridge University Press
- A.A. Trites, "The New Testament Concept of Witness", pp.78~127 (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Jung Sig Park, "The Shepherd Discourse in John 10", 박사, pp.1999
- Burton L. Mack, "Rhetoric and the New Testament" (1990), Fortress Press
- Charles H. Talbert, "What is a Gospel?: The Genre of the Canonical Gospels", pp.92~98 (1977), Fortress Press
- George A. Kennedy, "Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period: 330 B.C.-A.D. 400", pp.44~ (1997), Brill
- 유은걸, "요한복음의 죄 이해", 신약논단, 18(1), pp.131~161 (2011), 한국신약학회
- Thomas L. Brodie, "The Gospel according to John: A Literary and Theological Commentary", pp.345~ (1993), Oxford University Press
- J.W. Holleran, "Seeing the Light: A Narrative Reading of John 9", EThL, 69, pp.355~ (1993)
- D. A. Carson, "The Gospel according to John (PNTC)" (1991), WM. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co
- Barnabas Lindars, "The Gospel of John (NCBC)" (1972), Eerdmans
- P.D. Duke, "Irony in the Fourth Gospel", pp.118~119 (1985), John Konx
- G.M. Burger, "The Gospel of John (NIV Application Commentary)", pp.273~ (2000), Zondervan
- 콜린 G. 크루즈, "요한복음" (2002), CLC
- Andreas J. Köstenberger, "The Mission of Jesus and the Disciples According to the Fourth Gospel", pp.112~113 (1998), Eerdmans
- David T. Adamo, "Sin in John’s Gospel", Evangelical Review of Theology, 13, pp.217~ (1989)
- 박정식, "소경치유의 신학적 의미(요 9)", 광신논단, 21 (2012)
- George R. Beasley-Murray, "John" (1987), Word Books
- Ridderbos, "John", 336~
- Andreas J. Köstenberger, "John (BECNT)" (2004), Baker Academic
- Grant Osborne, "John (Life Application Bible Commentary)" (1993), Tyndale House Publishers, Inc
- 로버트 카이사르, "요한복음서 연구", pp.163~164 (1996), 성지출판사
- 박정식, "요한복음 5장에 나타난 재창조의 신학적인 의미", 신약논단, 5, pp.101~ (2003)
- William Hendrickson, "The Gospel of John: Chapters 7-21" (1979), Baker Book House
- S. Pancaro, "The Law in the Fourth Gospel: The Torah and the Gospel. Moses and Jesus, Judaism and Christianity according to John", pp.30~52 (1975), Brill
- Mark W.G. Stibbe, "John", pp.110~ (1993), Cambridge University Press
- 박정식, "요한복음주석: 요한복음의 재창조" (2014), CLC
- 문우일, "소경으로 태어나 다시 보는 사람(요한복음 9)", 신약연구, 13(2), pp.239~269 (2014), 한국복음주의신약학회
- 김세윤, "주기도문강해" (2011), 두란노
- F.F. Bruce, "신약사" (2010), 기독교문서선교회
- D.A. 카슨, "신약개론", pp.171~ (2008), 은성
- D. Moody Smith, "The Theology of the Gospel of John", pp.132~ (1995), Cambridge University Press
- Rudolf Schnackenburg, "The Gospel According to St. John: Commentary on Chapters 5-12", pp.321~ (1982), Burns & Oates
- D.R. Burkett, "The Son of Man in the Gospel of John", pp.165~ (1991), JSOT Press
- C.K. Barrett, "The Gospel according to St. John (IBC)", pp.365~ (1978), SPCK