본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Veterinary Information Coverage by Korean Media: Accuracy, Accessibility, and Comprehensibility Compared

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study comprehensively assesses the accuracy, accessibility, and comprehensibility of veterinary information disseminated by major media outlets in Korea. Understanding how media present such information is crucial for ensuring informed decision-making among pet owners and the general public. The study analyzed and compared the characteristics of veterinary information coverage between newspaper media and television news media over the past three years. A content analysis was conducted on 300 news articles from selected media outlets, and a survey involving 1,000 members of the general public assessed their perceptions of veterinary information. Television news media were found to score higher in accessibility and comprehensibility compared to newspaper media, excelling in easy access and understanding through audiovisual materials. Both types of media demonstrated high accuracy. Survey responses highlighted a need to enhance the reliability, accessibility, and comprehensibility of veterinary information. They also revealed that mass media's presentation significantly impacts public accessibility and understanding. The findings suggest that steps to enhance coverage include reducing jargon, improving visuals, and ensuring transparent sourcing to empower pet owners with reliable information.

Abstract

This study comprehensively assesses the accuracy, accessibility, and comprehensibility of veterinary information disseminated by major media outlets in Korea. Understanding how media present such information is crucial for ensuring informed decision-making among pet owners and the general public. The study analyzed and compared the characteristics of veterinary information coverage between newspaper media and television news media over the past three years. A content analysis was conducted on 300 news articles from selected media outlets, and a survey involving 1,000 members of the general public assessed their perceptions of veterinary information. Television news media were found to score higher in accessibility and comprehensibility compared to newspaper media, excelling in easy access and understanding through audiovisual materials. Both types of media demonstrated high accuracy. Survey responses highlighted a need to enhance the reliability, accessibility, and comprehensibility of veterinary information. They also revealed that mass media's presentation significantly impacts public accessibility and understanding. The findings suggest that steps to enhance coverage include reducing jargon, improving visuals, and ensuring transparent sourcing to empower pet owners with reliable information.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Baran, S. J., "Mass Communication Theory" (2014), Oxford University Press
  2. Berland, G. K., "Health Information on the Internet : Accessibility, Quality, and Readability in English and Spanish", JAMA, 285(20), pp.2612~2621 (2001)
  3. Coe, J. B., "A Focus Group Study of Veterinarians' and Pet Owners' Perceptions of Veterinarian-client Communication in Companion Animal Practice", Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 233(7), pp.1072~1080 (2008)
  4. Coggon, J., "What Makes Health Public?: A Critical Evaluation of Moral, Legal, and Political Claims in Public Health" (2012), Cambridge University Press
  5. Eysenbach, G., "Empirical Studies Assessing the Quality of Health Information for Consumers on the World Wide Web : A Systematic Review", Jama, 287(20), pp.2691~2700 (2002)
  6. Gray, N. J., "Health Information-seeking Behavior in Adolescence : The Place of the Internet", Social Science & Medicineoc Sci Med, 60(7), pp.1467~1478 (2005)
  7. Jacobs, W., "Health Information Seeking in the Digital Age : An Analysis of Health Information Seeking Behavior among US Adults", Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), pp.1302785~ (2017)
  8. Janke, N., "Pet Owners’ and Veterinarians’ Perceptions of Information Exchange and Clinical Decision-making in Companion Animal Practice", Public Library of Science OneLoS One, 16(2), pp.e0245632~ (2021)
  9. Lenartz, A., "The Persistent Lack of Knowledge and Misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act(GINA)more than a Decade after Passage", Genet Med, 23(12), pp.2324~2334 (2021)
  10. Martin, N., "Recommendations for Enhancing the Usability and Understandability of Process Mining in Healthcare", Artificial Intelligence in Medicinertif Intell Med, 109, pp.101962~ (2020)
  11. Martin, S. W., "Veterinary Epidemiology: Principles and Methods" (1987), Lowa State University Press
  12. McNicholas, J., "Pet Ownership and Human Health : A Brief Review of Evidence and Issues", BMJ, 331(7527), pp.1252~1254 (2005)
  13. Overgaauw, P. A., "A One Health Perspective on the Human-companion Animal Relationship with Emphasis on Zoonotic Aspects", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthnt J Environ Res Public Health, 17(11), pp.3789~ (2020)
  14. Pedersen, H., "Animals in Schools: Processes and Strategies in Human-Animal Education" (2010), Purdue University Press
  15. Perse, E. M., "Media Effects and Society" (2016), Routledge
  16. Pun, J. K., "An Integrated Review of the Role of Communication in Veterinary Clinical Practice", BMC Veterinary Research, 16, pp.1~14 (2020)
  17. Schwitzer, G., "What are the Roles and Responsibilities of the Media in Disseminating Health Information?", Public Library of Science MedicineLoS Med, 2(7), pp.e215~ (2005)
  18. Seale, C., "Health and Media : An Overview", Sociology of Health & Illnessociol Health Illn, 25(6), pp.513~531 (2003)
  19. Sørensen, K., "Health Literacy and Public Health : A Systematic Review and Integration of Definitions and Models", BMC Public Health, 12, pp.1~13 (2012)
  20. Storino, A., "Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer", JAMA Surg, 151(9), pp.831~837 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)