본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

데살로니가전서 5장 1-11절에 나타난 “빛의 자녀”의 의미 고찰: 아모스 5장 18-20절과 쿰란 문서에 비추어서

Understanding of “Children of Light” in 1 Thessalonians 5:1-11 in Light of Amos 5:18-20 and the Qumran Documents

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구는 데살로니가전서의 권면부(4-5장)에서 중요한 위치를 차지하고 있는 5장 1-11절에 드러난 바울의 주요 논지를 파악하고자 한다. 주어진 본문에서 바울은 “주의 날”(ἡμέρα κυρίου)에 외인(비신자)과 내부 공동체(신자)가 직면할 상반된 최후 결말을 대비시킴으로써 데살로니가 신자들의 정체성 및 에토스 형성을 하고 있음을 밝혀내고자 한다. 외인(비신자)들은 “평안”과 “안전”에 대하여 긍정적으로 전망하였는데, 고대 데살로니가는 로마 제국이 부여한 “자유 도시”(civitas libera)로서의 지위를 누리면서, 경제적 번영과 정치적 안정에 의존했다. 그러나 주의 날이 임할 때, 실상은 그들의 기대와 달리 해산의 고통과 같은 갑작스러운 멸망의 결과를 마주하게 될 것이다(5:3). 한편, 바울은 데살로니가 신자들이 주의 날에 임할 하나님의 진노를 받지 않을 것이라고 이야기하면서 신자들의 정체성을 “빛의 자녀들”로 명시한다. 바울이 보여주는 “빛”과 “어둠” 은유가 가지는 함의에 관하여, 지금까지 대부분 데살로니가전서 주석가들이나 학자들은 “빛”과 “어둠”의 은유가 단순히 도덕적인 함의를 내포하는 것으로 여겨왔다. 그러나 본 연구는 이 은유들이 단순히 도덕적인 함의를 넘어서, 신자들의 총체적이며 전인적인 특성, 즉 그들이 속해 있는 영역, 그들의 존재론적 정체성과 에토스를 나타내기 위함이라고 주장한다. 특별히, “빛의 자녀들”이라는 은유가 반향하는, 개연성 있는 유대적 배경들과 본문 간의 유사성에 주목함으로써 어떻게 그 반향들이 이 은유들의 포괄적 함의를 뒷받침하며, 본문의 논지를 분명히 세워가는데 있어서 기여하는지에 대하여 살펴본다. 구체적으로, 본문에 나타나는 두 상반된 집단을 가리키는 이 은유들은 구체적으로 아모스 5장 18-20절에 나타나는 “빛”과 “어둠”의 대조와 쿰란문서에 등장하는 “빛의 자녀”의 개념에 의해 명확해질 수 있다고 주장한다. 이 두 상반된 개념이 구약에서 사용된 용례들과 다른 몇몇 유대적 배경들과의 연관성을 짓는 것이 본문의 논지를 밝혀내는데 있어서 중요하다. 단순히 본문에 반향된 유대적 배경에 대한 가능성 자체를 논하는 차원을 넘어서, 유대적 배경들과 본문에 드러난 저자의 논지 사이의 연결성을 확립하고자 하는 것이 본 연구의 목적이다.

Abstract

This study examines Paul’s major thrust in 1 Thessalonians 5:1-11, which is located in the apex of this letter’s paraenetic part. In this text, the expression, ἡμέρα κυρίου (the Day of the Lord) is a significant rhetorical (discursive) situation in which the fate of outsider and insider is contrasted and thereby intends to shape the community’s identity and ethos. The first century Thessalonica having a status of “civitas libera” relied on the “peace” and “security”; this slogan indicates that they had privileges of economic prosperity and political stability brought by the Roman Empire. However, the Day of the Lord would betray their expectation of peace and security since the Day would bring sudden destruction upon them (5:3). On the other hand, the Thessalonians believers are not in “darkness” since they would not be affected by God’s wrath on the eschaton; God destined the believers to obtain salvation through Jesus Christ (5:9). Prominently, Paul describes the identity of the Thessalonians as “Children of Light.” Unfortunately, many Thessalonian commentators and scholars have understood the light metaphor merely in an ethical sense. But this study argues that this metaphor is more inclusive, connoting the believers’ sense of belonging, spiritual status and a realm where God’s wrath does not affect, and ethos. In particular, the implication of the metaphors (light and darkness) would be clarified by focusing on the similarities between our text and some probable Jewish backgrounds behind them. Specifically, the implication of two contrasting groups in this Paul’s letter can be illuminated by comparing with Amos 5:18-20 and the expression of “sons of light” (בני אור) in some Qumranian documents. Appreciating the similarities with the documents would lead interpreters to identify more inclusive implication of the light metaphor.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. Andersen F. I, "Amos: the Anchor Bible" (1989), Doubleday
  2. Barclay, J. M. G, "Thessalonica and Corinth: Social Contrast in Pauline Christianity", Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 47, pp.49~74 (1992)
  3. Bauer, W, "3rd edition" (2000), University of Chicago Press
  4. Beale, G. K, "1-2 Thessalonians: The IVP New Testament Commentary Series" (2003), IVP
  5. Beetham, C. A, "Echoes of Scripture in the Letter of Paul to the Colossians" (2008), SBL
  6. Best, E, "First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians: Black’s New Testament Commentary" (1986), Continuum
  7. Boring, M. E. I, "II Thessalonians: The New Testament Library" (2015), Westminster John Knox
  8. Botterweck, G. J, "Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament. 15 vols" (2012), Eerdmans
  9. Bruce, F. F, "1 and 2 Thessalonians: World Biblical Commentary" (1982), Word Books
  10. DeSilva, D. A, "Worthy of His Kingdom’: Honor Discourse and Social Engineering in 1 Thessalonians", JSNT, 64, pp.49~79 (1996)
  11. DeVilliers, P. G. R, "Identity, Ethics, and Ethos in the New Testament", pp.335~355 (2006), Walter de Gruyter
  12. Donfried, K. P, "The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament", pp.504~514 (2010), Blackwell
  13. Duff, N. J, "Apocalyptic and the New Testament: Essays in Honor of J. Louis Martyn", pp.279~296 (2015), Bloomsbury
  14. Eadie, J, "A Commentary on the Greek Text of the Epistles of Paul to the Thessalonians" (1877), Macmillan
  15. Elgvin, T, "Sapiential, Liturgical, and Poetical Texts from Qumran: Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the International Organization for Qumran Studies, Oslo, 1998: Published in Memory of Maurice Baillet", pp.15~38 (1998), Brill
  16. Fee, G. D, "Pauline Christology: An Exegetical-Theological Study" (2007), Hendrickson
  17. Fee, G. D, "The First and Second Letters to the Thessalonians: New International Commentary on the New Testament" (2009), Eerdmans
  18. Frey, J, "The Oxford Handbook of Apocalyptic Literature", pp.271~294 (2014), Oxford University
  19. Gaventa, B. R, "First and Second Thessalonians: Interpretation" (1998), Westminster John Knox
  20. Gempf, C, "The Imagery of Labor Pangs in the New Testament", TynBul, 45, pp.119~135 (2007)
  21. Green, G. L, "The Letters to the Thessalonians: The Pillar New Testament Commentary" (2002), Eerdmans
  22. Heger, P, "Dualism in Qumran", pp.39~101 (2010), T & T Clark
  23. Hendrix, H. L, "The Future Early Christianity", pp.107~118 (1991), Fortress
  24. Hendrix, H. L, "Thessalonicans Honor Romans", Th.D, pp.1984
  25. Hoffmann, Y, "The Day of the Lord as Concept and a Term in the Prophetic literature", ZAW, 93, pp.37~50 (1981)
  26. Horrell, D. G, "Solidarity and Difference: A Contemporary Reading of Paul’s Ethics" (2005), T&T Clark
  27. Jokiranta, J, "Social Identity and Sectarianism in the Qumran Movement" (2013), Brill
  28. Josephus F, "유대고대사" (1987), 생명의 말씀사
  29. Kittel, G, "heological Dictionary of the New Testament. 10 vols" (1976), Eerdmans
  30. Kucicki, J, "Eschatology of the Thessalonian Correspondence: A Comparative Study of 1 Thess 4,13-5, 11 and 2 Thess 2, 1-12 to the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Old Testament" (2014), Peter Lang
  31. Luckensmeyer, D, "The Eschatology of First Thessalonians" (2009), Vandenhoeck & Ruprech
  32. Lünemann G, "Critical and Exegetical Handbook to the Epistles of St. Paul to the Thessalonians" (1880), Edinburgh
  33. Malherbe, A. J, "The Letters to the Thessalonians: The Anchor Bible" (2000), Doubleday
  34. Marshall, I. H, "1 and 2 Thessalonians: The New Century Bible Commentary" (1983), Eerdmans
  35. May, H. D, "Cosmological Reference in the Qumran Doctrine of the Two Spirits and in Old Testament Imagery", JBL, 82(1), pp.1~14 (1963)
  36. Meeks, W. A, "Apocalypticism in the Mediterranean World and the Near East", pp.687~705 (1983), Tübingen
  37. Meeks, W. A, "The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul" (1983), Yale University Press
  38. Meeks, W. A, "The Origins of Christian Morality: The First Two Centuries" (1993), Yale University
  39. Morris, L, "1 and 2 Thessalonians: Tyndale New Testament Commentaries" (2009), IVP
  40. Moule, C. F. D, "An Idiom Book of New Testament Greek" (1960), Cambridge University Press
  41. Moulton, J. H, "A Grammar of New Testament Greek. Vol. 3" (1976), T&T Clark
  42. Murphy, F. J, "Apocalypticism in the Bible and Its World" (2012), Baker
  43. Richard, E. J, "First and Second Thessalonians: Sacra Pagina" (2007), The Liturgical Press
  44. Selby, G. S, "Blameless at His Coming’: The Discursive Construction of Eschatological Reality in 1 Thessalonians", Rhetorica, 17(4), pp.385~410 (1999)
  45. Silva, M, "New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology and Exegesis. 5 vols" (2014), Zondervan
  46. Shogren, G. S, "1 & 2 Thessalonians: Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament" (2012), Zondervan
  47. Smith, G. V, "Amos: Mentor Commentary" (1998), Mentor
  48. Smith, G. V, "Continuity and Discontinuity in Amos’ Use of Tradition", JETS, 34, pp.33~42 (1991)
  49. Sterner, R. H, "A Semantic and Structural Analysis of 1 Thessalonians" (1998), Summer Institute of Linguistics
  50. Tellbe, M, "Paul between Synagogue and State: Christian, Jews, and Civic Authorities in 1 Thessalonians" (2001), Almqvist & Wiksell
  51. Tuckett, C. M, "Thessalonian Correspondence", pp.160~182 (1990), Peeters
  52. Vermes, G, "The Dead Sea Scrolls in English. Revisied and extended 4th ed" (1995), Sheffield Academic
  53. Wallace, D. B, "Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament" (1996), Zondervan
  54. Wanamaker, C. A, "The Epistle to the Thessalonians: New International Greek Testament Commentary" (1990), Eerdmans
  55. Wanamaker, C. A, "Apocalyptic Discourse, Paraenesis and Identity Maintenance in 1 Thessalonians", Neot, 36, pp.131~145 (2002)
  56. Watson, D. F, "Vision and Persuasion: Rhetorical Dimensions of Apocalyptic Discourse", pp.61~80 (1999), Chalice
  57. Weima, J. A. D, "1-2 Thessalonians: Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament" (2014), Baker
  58. Witherington III, B, "1 and 2 Thessalonians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary" (2006), Eerdmans
  59. Zanker, P, "The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus" (1990), The University of Michigan Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)