Jung-Ryu’s Ecclesiology in His Commentary on Matthew: Israel, Church, and the Kingdom of Heaven
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study investigates Jung-Ryu’s ecclesiology as it appears in his commentary on Matthew. Although he got his Ph.D. from Dallas Theological Seminary which advocates dispensationalism, he has differing views on the ecclesiology. Both Jung-Ryu and dispensationalism admit Israel’s prerogative status in God’s salvific scheme. However, while Israel’s restoration is an indispensable precondition for the parousia in dispensationalism, it is not a prerequisite but a result of the Christ’s return in Jung-Ryu’s view. Besides, unlike dispensationalists, he does not sharply distinguish Israel from the church nor does he consider its foundation is a contingency plan of God. For him, the church is the universal community where both Israel and the gentiles, being saved by Jesus, become one united body, and the barrier between them is overcome by the cross. It is Jung-Ryu’s uniqueness that associates the church with the kingdom of heaven. For him the church is the present kingdom of God where his royal authority is exerted. Thus he considers Matthew 13(the chapter of the kingdom parables) as the lessons for the church. His interpretation has the following four features: the primary mission assigned to the church is to spread the gospel to the world; its present state is the corpus mixtum where both good and evil exist together; it continues to grow despite its small beginning; the true Christians commit themselves to the Christ alone. Jung-Ryu is a scholar of great insight who, already in ’70s, understood the kingdom of heaven not as a postmortem utopia but as the present realm where God’s sovereignty is exercised. Yet, it is still difficult to agree with his argument that equates the church itself with the kingdom of heaven. Admittedly, the church should be the place where God reigns. However, God is not only the Lord of the church but also the ruler of the whole world. The kingdom of God(or heaven) must extend beyond the church and proceed into the world. Despite its slight drawback, Jung-Ryu’s theology is still worthy to learn today. In many Korean churches, the kingdom of heaven has long been understood as a postmortem utopia. It is only recently that they began to realize that its gist is God’s royal sovereignty. This being so, Jung-Ryu’s kingdom theology is truly ahead of his time. It was only possible because he, based on the Reformed tradition, was not biased toward dispensationalism, but embraced various strands of argument at that time, attempting to establish a holistic and biblically balanced theology.
Abstract
The present study investigates Jung-Ryu’s ecclesiology as it appears in his commentary on Matthew. Although he got his Ph.D. from Dallas Theological Seminary which advocates dispensationalism, he has differing views on the ecclesiology. Both Jung-Ryu and dispensationalism admit Israel’s prerogative status in God’s salvific scheme. However, while Israel’s restoration is an indispensable precondition for the parousia in dispensationalism, it is not a prerequisite but a result of the Christ’s return in Jung-Ryu’s view. Besides, unlike dispensationalists, he does not sharply distinguish Israel from the church nor does he consider its foundation is a contingency plan of God. For him, the church is the universal community where both Israel and the gentiles, being saved by Jesus, become one united body, and the barrier between them is overcome by the cross. It is Jung-Ryu’s uniqueness that associates the church with the kingdom of heaven. For him the church is the present kingdom of God where his royal authority is exerted. Thus he considers Matthew 13(the chapter of the kingdom parables) as the lessons for the church. His interpretation has the following four features: the primary mission assigned to the church is to spread the gospel to the world; its present state is the corpus mixtum where both good and evil exist together; it continues to grow despite its small beginning; the true Christians commit themselves to the Christ alone. Jung-Ryu is a scholar of great insight who, already in ’70s, understood the kingdom of heaven not as a postmortem utopia but as the present realm where God’s sovereignty is exercised. Yet, it is still difficult to agree with his argument that equates the church itself with the kingdom of heaven. Admittedly, the church should be the place where God reigns. However, God is not only the Lord of the church but also the ruler of the whole world. The kingdom of God(or heaven) must extend beyond the church and proceed into the world. Despite its slight drawback, Jung-Ryu’s theology is still worthy to learn today. In many Korean churches, the kingdom of heaven has long been understood as a postmortem utopia. It is only recently that they began to realize that its gist is God’s royal sovereignty. This being so, Jung-Ryu’s kingdom theology is truly ahead of his time. It was only possible because he, based on the Reformed tradition, was not biased toward dispensationalism, but embraced various strands of argument at that time, attempting to establish a holistic and biblically balanced theology.
참고문헌 (32)
- 권호덕, "칼빈의 시각으로 본 靜流 이상근 목사", 한국개혁신학, 36, pp.16~65 (2012), 한국개혁신학회[DOI]
- 김동수, "신약성서는 교황제를 지지하는가? -마태복음 16:18-19을 중심으로", 신약논단, 22(3), pp.565~594 (2015), 한국신약학회
- 김태섭, "마태복음 19:28의 κρίνοντες에 대한 해석", 성경원문연구, (36), pp.165~186 (2015), (재)대한성서공회 성경번역연구소[DOI]
- 김태섭, "성경을 통해 살펴본 오늘날 이스라엘 회복운동", 피어선신학논단, 3(2), pp.143~166 (2014), 피어선기념성경연구원
- 라이리, 찰스 C, "세대주의의 바른 이해" (1993), 전도출판사
- 박원호, "우리가 하나님 나라를 몰랐다" (2015), 두란노
- 배재욱, "정류 이상근 박사의 신약성서 해석" (2019), 정류아카데미
- 배재욱, "정류(靜流) 이상근박사의 신학과 사상" (2018), 대한복음과교회학술원
- 배재욱, "정류(靜流) 이상근박사의 신학 단초와 마태복음 주해", 한국개혁신학, 36, pp.178~206 (2012), 한국개혁신학회[DOI]
- 신인철, "정류 이상근 박사의 신약성서 해석" (2019), 정류아카데미
- 양용의, "하나님나라 어떻게 이해할 것인가" (2005), 한국성서유니온선교회
- 이상근, "등대가 있는 외딴 섬: 신·구약, 외경을 모두 주석한 세계 유일의 신학자" (2002), 두란노
- 이상근, "신약성서주해: 마태복음" (1968), 대한예수교장로회총회교육부
- 이상근, "신약성서주해: 로마서" (1991), 성등사
- Bass, Clarence, "Backgrounds to Dispensationalism" (1960), Eerdmans
- Blaising, Craig A, "Dispensationalism, Israel and the Church: The Search for Definition" (1992), Zondervan
- Carter, Warren, "Matthew 23 : 37-39", Interpretation, 54(1), pp.66~68 (2000)
- Darby, J. N, "The Collected Writings of J. N. Darby, vol.2" (1962), Stow Hill Bible and Trust Depot
- Davies, W. D, "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to Saint Matthew. vol.1" (1988), T. & T. Clark
- France, R. T, "The Gospel of Matthew" (2007), Eerdmans
- Hagner, Donald, "Matthew 14-28" (1995), Word Books
- Hare, Douglas R. A, "Make Disciples of All the Gentiles", Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 37(3), pp.359~369 (1975)
- Keener, C, "A Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew" (1999), Eerdmans
- 김태섭, "The Gospel of Matthew as an Exhortation for the Gentile Mission", 종교와 문화, (28), pp.133~159 (2015), 종교문제연구소
- Lindsey, Hal, "The Late Great Planet Earth" (1970), Zondervan
- Luz, Ulich, "Matthew 21-28" (2005), Fortress Press
- Meier, John P, "Nations or Gentiles in Matthew 28 : 19?", Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 39(1), pp.94~102 (1977)
- Pennington, Jonathan, "Heaven and Earth in the Gospel of Matthew" (2007), Brill
- Sandeen, Ernest, "The Roots of Fundamentalism: British & American Millenarianism, 1800-1930" (1970), Chicago University Press
- Stanton, Graham N, "A Gospel for a New People: Studies in Matthew" (1993), T & T Clark
- Stassen, Glen H, "The Fourteen Triads of the Sermon on the Mount, Matt 5:2-7:12", Journal of Biblical Literature, 122(2), pp.267~308 (2003)
- Trilling, W, "Das Wahre Israel: Studien zur Theologie des Matthäuse-Evangeliums" (1964), Kösel-Verlag
