Disaster Vulnerability Taken Away, and Vulnerability as a Restored Paradigm
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzed the social characteristics of Japan in interpreting disasters and how the logic of danger and risks is used to cover up the problem of vulnerability in the social context. This study has proved that in fact, safety and peace are ideological concept that exist between disasters, and that everyday life hides the reality of the continuation of disasters. Extending this logic, this study has presented the largest factors that enable disasters to conceal the social vulnerability and prevent people from realizing that in everyday life through a specific keyword, along with their historicity. This has led to the realization that vulnerability is socially created, and paradoxically, it is also an essential factor that helps realize the social structure. Such realization shows that the Japanese society understands danger and risks as 'the same concept' and is subjected to this concept, which has led to the logic of disasters concealing the problems related to class and vulnerability. Consequently, this study suggested that the logic of disasters should be reborn as the culture of disasters and used as a concept to help raise the awareness to rethink social phenomena, especially disasters, through the keyword 'vulnerability.'
Abstract
This study analyzed the social characteristics of Japan in interpreting disasters and how the logic of danger and risks is used to cover up the problem of vulnerability in the social context. This study has proved that in fact, safety and peace are ideological concept that exist between disasters, and that everyday life hides the reality of the continuation of disasters. Extending this logic, this study has presented the largest factors that enable disasters to conceal the social vulnerability and prevent people from realizing that in everyday life through a specific keyword, along with their historicity. This has led to the realization that vulnerability is socially created, and paradoxically, it is also an essential factor that helps realize the social structure. Such realization shows that the Japanese society understands danger and risks as 'the same concept' and is subjected to this concept, which has led to the logic of disasters concealing the problems related to class and vulnerability. Consequently, this study suggested that the logic of disasters should be reborn as the culture of disasters and used as a concept to help raise the awareness to rethink social phenomena, especially disasters, through the keyword 'vulnerability.'
참고문헌 (24)
- Alexander, D, "What Is a Disaster? New Answers to Old Questions", pp.25~38 (2005)
- Allen, Quarantelli E. L, "WhatIs a Disaster? New Answers to Old Questions", pp.325~396 (2005)
- Fujigaki, Yuko, "Framing, Techniques of Science. Technology and Society", pp.272~ (2005), University of Tokyo Press
- Higuchi, Teizo, "About Food System Vulnerabilities-From the "Cultural Structure" Perspective of Food Safety Issues", Agriculture and Forestry Statistics Survey, 50(9), pp.4~10 (2000)
- Hoshino, Yoshirou, "The Great Hanshin Earthquake - Vulnerability of Japan's Advanced Technology Questioned by Seismic Intensity 7", The Economist, 73(19), pp.100~105 (1995)
- Inukai, Yuuichi, "Sekentai State Japan: Its Structure and Curse", pp.230~232 (2021), Kobunsha
- Kawata, Yoshiaki, "A New Framework for Urban Disaster Research", Papers of the Annual Conference of the Institute of Social Safety Science 6, Institute of Social Safety Science, pp.337~344 (1996)
- Konagai, Kazuo, "Blind Spots of Modern Society Emerging in Earthquakes", Seisan Kenkyu, 54(6), pp.359~360 (2002)
- Kosaka, Shunkichi, "Extraction of Earthquake Disaster Prevention Issues in an Aging Society", Papers of the Annual Conference of the Institute of Social Safety Science 5, pp.275~282 (1995), Institute of Social Safety Science
- Lee, Young Ja, "Reconsideration of the Concept of the People with Special Needs to Disaster : An Approach to "People with Special Needs to Disaster" from "Vulnerable People to Disaster"", Welfare Community Development Research, 8(1), pp.38~48 (2006)
- Mabuchi, Koji, "Solidarity", Chikumasyobo, 13~ (2021)
- Max, Weber, "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism" (1976), Iwanamisyoten
- Max, Weber, "Society's Basic Education", pp.8~ (1972), Iwanamisyoten
- Nassim, Nicholas, "Anti-fragile (vol. 1)", pp.22~23 (2017), Diamondsya
- Nnaba, Kouji, "Situation Definition, Informatics Encyclopedia", pp.431~ (2002), Koubunndou
- Oliver-Simith, A, "Global Changes and the Definition of Disaster. What Is a Disaster: Perspectives on the Question", pp.177~194 (1998), Routledge
- Sorokin, Pitirim Aleksandrovich, "Man and Society in Calamity", pp.15~ (1998), BunkasyobouHakubunsya
- Taikakai, "History of the Ministry of Home Affairs 1", pp.569~ (1971), Institute of Local Finance
- Unagami, Tomoaki, "Natural Disasters Viewed from Behavioural", Social Science: Its Trends and Remaining Questions, 2012, pp.22(4), 199~201
- Unagami, Tomoaki, "Review on the Definition of the Concept "Risk"", Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis, 22(2), pp.77~79 (2012)
- Urano, Masaki, "Introduction to Reconstruction Community Theory", pp.4~5 (2007), Koubunntou
- Wisner, B., "At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters", pp.11~25 (2003), Routledge
- Wijkman, A., "Natural Disasters: Acts of God or Acts of Man?", pp.1~125 (1988), New Society Publishers
- Yosida, Kazuo, "Gottl's Thought of Life", The Business Review of Kansai University, 45(2), pp.245~258 (2000)