본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Hearing Aid Selection: Closed- versus Open-canal Fitting Hearing Aids

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

To select hearing aid is an essential process for successful hearing rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to review hearing aid selection considerations between receiver in-the-canal (RIC) and custom hearing aid (CHA) in order to guide appropriate selection of the hearing aid. This study discussed three key factors in the hearing aid selection including physical, acoustic and electroacoustic characteristics and other aspects. Advantages of RIC types are comfort to wear, reduction of the occlusion effect, presence of directional microphones, on-site fit, easy connectivity with other devices, and use of rechargeable batteries. On the other hand, the CHA types have their advantage in terms of being comfort to wear with masks, proper insertion and placement, reduction of the acoustic feedback, good approximation of frequency response curve, improvement of speech in noise perception, expanded hearing aid candidacy with varying hearing thresholds, and easy telephone use. We concluded that appropriate selection of the hearing aid would contribute to successful hearing rehabilitation, if considering physical, psycho-social, and acoustical characteristics.

Abstract

To select hearing aid is an essential process for successful hearing rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to review hearing aid selection considerations between receiver in-the-canal (RIC) and custom hearing aid (CHA) in order to guide appropriate selection of the hearing aid. This study discussed three key factors in the hearing aid selection including physical, acoustic and electroacoustic characteristics and other aspects. Advantages of RIC types are comfort to wear, reduction of the occlusion effect, presence of directional microphones, on-site fit, easy connectivity with other devices, and use of rechargeable batteries. On the other hand, the CHA types have their advantage in terms of being comfort to wear with masks, proper insertion and placement, reduction of the acoustic feedback, good approximation of frequency response curve, improvement of speech in noise perception, expanded hearing aid candidacy with varying hearing thresholds, and easy telephone use. We concluded that appropriate selection of the hearing aid would contribute to successful hearing rehabilitation, if considering physical, psycho-social, and acoustical characteristics.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Aazh, H., "The accuracy of matching target insertion gains with open-fit hearing aids", American Journal of Audiology, 21(2), pp.175~180 (2012)
  2. "High Frequencies and Microphone Placement Lead to a New Type of RIC Hearing Aid" (2011)[URL]
  3. Başkent, D., "Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), pp.2908~2925 (2006)
  4. Caporali, S. A., "The vent effect in instant ear tips and its impact on the fitting of modern hearing aids", Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research (Proc. ISAAR), 7, pp.206~212 (2019)
  5. "Maximizing Speech Intelligibility for Open Canal Fittings" (2008)[URL]
  6. Dillon, H., "Hearing Aids" (2012), Thieme
  7. "Why Open Hearing Aid Fittings Are Often Not the Best Choice for the Patient" (2019)[URL]
  8. "Closing the Open Fitting:An Effective Method to Optimize Speech Understanding" (2019)[URL]
  9. Galster, J. A., "A new method for wireless connectivity in hearing aids", The Hearing Journal, 63(10), pp.36~ (2010)
  10. Gnewikow, D., "Hearing aid outcomes with openand closed-canal fittings", The Hearing Journal, 59(11), pp.66~72 (2006)
  11. "Dos and Don’ts of Open Fittings" (2011)[URL]
  12. Hoen, M., "Hearing aids with external receivers : Can they offer power and cosmetics", The Hearing Journal, 60(1), pp.28~34 (2007)
  13. Hyeryeong Jo, "Comparison of Preferred Real-Ear Insertion Gain between Open- and Closed-Canal Fitting Hearing Aids", Audiology and Speech Research, 17(2), pp.180~186 (2021), 한국청각언어재활학회
  14. Kochkin, S., "MarkeTrak VIII: Mini-BTEs tap new market, users more satisfied", The Hearing Journal, 64(3), pp.17~ (2011)
  15. Kuk, F., "Hearing aid selection and BTEs:Choosing among various “open-ear” and “receiver-in-canal” options", Hearing Review, 15(3), pp.22~ (2008)
  16. MacKenzie, D. J., "Open-canal fittings and the hearing aid occlusion effect", The Hearing Journal, 59(11), pp.50~ (2006)
  17. Munro, K. J., "Deriving the real-ear SPL of audiometric data using the “coupler to dial difference” and the “real ear to coupler difference”", Ear and Hearing, 24(2), pp.100~110 (2003)
  18. Needleman, A. R., "Speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired and noise-masked normal-hearing listeners", Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 6(6), pp.414~424 (1995)
  19. 박지혜, "외이도수화기보청기의 이어팁 형태와 고막보청기의 폐쇄효과 비교", Audiology and Speech Research, 15(2), pp.95~100 (2019), 한국청각언어재활학회
  20. Prakash, S. G. R., "Sensori-neural hearing loss client’s performance with receiver-in-canal (RIC) hearing aids", International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 2(2), pp.68~73 (2013)
  21. Sanders, J., "Manufacturers’ NAL-nl2 fittings fail real-ear verification", Hearing Review, 21(3), pp.24~ (2015)
  22. 심상익, "MarkeTrak을 기반으로 한 미국의 보청기 만족도 및 시장동향 고찰", Audiology and Speech Research, 15(1), pp.11~22 (2019), 한국청각언어재활학회
  23. "Ear-coupler Acoustics in Receiver-inthe-aid Fittings" (2009)[URL]
  24. "A Brief History of Hearing Aid Styles; 1991-2020" (2021)[URL]
  25. Winkler, A., "Open versus closed hearingaid fittings : A literature review of both fitting approaches", Trends in Hearing, 20, pp.1~3 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)