본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

외이도수화기보청기의 이어팁 형태와 고막보청기의 폐쇄효과 비교

Comparison of Occlusion Effect between Ear-Tip Type of Receiver-In-Canal Hearing Aids and Completely-In-the-Canal

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: To compare the occlusion effect (OE) of a completely-in-the-canal (CIC) hearing aid and receiver-in-canal (RIC) hearing aid with open ear tip (OET), closed ear tip (CET), and double ear tip (DET), the present study measured the real-ear insertion gain (REIG) and psychoacoustic differences. Methods: While seventeen adults with normal hearing wearing the dummy CIC hearing aid and three types of ear-tips for the RIC hearing aid, they vocalized the /ee [i]/ sound. The REIG and psychoacoustic differences were measured at each condition and compared in terms of decibel and degree of occlusion. Results: First, OET and CET types for the RIC hearing aids were more effective to reduce the OE than both DET type of RIC hearing aid and CIC hearing aid. Second, there was no difference between DET type of the RIC hearing aid and CIC hearing aid in terms of REIG and psychoacoustics. Third, the REIG of the DET with RIC hearing aid and CIC hearing aids was lower in the frequency band of around 3,000 Hz than the other types such as OET and CET. Conclusion: The current results support that the OET and CET types for RIC hearing aids effectively help reducing the OE. Regardless, the CIC hearing aid which has reduced gain in the high frequencies also can provide better speech perception and sound quality. In conclusion, when selecting an open fit or custom hearing aid, the hearing-impaired listeners are recommended while considering both degree, type, and configuration of hearing loss and technical aspects of hearing aid.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the occlusion effect (OE) of a completely-in-the-canal (CIC) hearing aid and receiver-in-canal (RIC) hearing aid with open ear tip (OET), closed ear tip (CET), and double ear tip (DET), the present study measured the real-ear insertion gain (REIG) and psychoacoustic differences. Methods: While seventeen adults with normal hearing wearing the dummy CIC hearing aid and three types of ear-tips for the RIC hearing aid, they vocalized the /ee [i]/ sound. The REIG and psychoacoustic differences were measured at each condition and compared in terms of decibel and degree of occlusion. Results: First, OET and CET types for the RIC hearing aids were more effective to reduce the OE than both DET type of RIC hearing aid and CIC hearing aid. Second, there was no difference between DET type of the RIC hearing aid and CIC hearing aid in terms of REIG and psychoacoustics. Third, the REIG of the DET with RIC hearing aid and CIC hearing aids was lower in the frequency band of around 3,000 Hz than the other types such as OET and CET. Conclusion: The current results support that the OET and CET types for RIC hearing aids effectively help reducing the OE. Regardless, the CIC hearing aid which has reduced gain in the high frequencies also can provide better speech perception and sound quality. In conclusion, when selecting an open fit or custom hearing aid, the hearing-impaired listeners are recommended while considering both degree, type, and configuration of hearing loss and technical aspects of hearing aid.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. Carle, R., "Observations on the relations among occlusion effect, compliance, and vent size", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13(1), pp.25~37 (2002)
  2. Dillon, H., "Hearing Aids" (2012), Boomerang Press
  3. Jespersen, C. T., "The occlusion effect in unilateral versus bilateral hearing aids", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17(10), pp.763~773 (2006)
  4. Kiessling, J., "Occlusion effect of earmolds with different venting systems", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16(4), pp.237~249 (2005)
  5. Kirwood, D. H., "Bucking bad economic news, hearing aid sales rise by 5.4% on way to record year", The Hearing Journal, 60(12), pp.11~16 (2007)
  6. Kochkin, S., "MarkeTrak VIII: Consumer satisfaction with hearing aids is slowly increasing", The Hearing Journal, 63(1), pp.19~20 (2010)
  7. Kochkin, S., "MarkeTrak VIII Mini-BTEs tap new market, users more satisfied", The Hearing Journal, 64(3), pp.17~18 (2011)
  8. Kuk, F., "How do vents affect hearing aid performance?", Hearing Review, 13(2), pp.34~ (2006)
  9. 이수현, "고막보청기의 골부 길이에 따른 폐쇄효과의 음향적 그리고 심리음향적 변화", Audiology and Speech Research, 9(2), pp.157~164 (2013), 한국청각언어재활학회
  10. Mueller, H. G., "There’s less talking in barrels, but the occlusion effect is still with us", The Hearing Journal, 56(8), pp.10~16 (2003)
  11. Park, J. H., "Comparison with occlusion effects in CIC and IIC hearing aid", 19th Symposium of Korean Academy of Audiology, pp.83~84 (2016), Seoul University College of Nursing
  12. Stone, M. A., "A technique for estimating the occlusion effect for frequencies below 125 Hz", Ear and Hearing, 35(1), pp.49~55 (2014)
  13. Winkler, A., "Open versus closed hearing-aid fittings: A literature review of both fitting approaches", Trends in Hearing, 20 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)