Fire Risk Assessment of Energy Storage System Based on Case Studies Using Risk Matrix Method
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Energy Storage System (ESS) is a facility that can store electricity and supply power when needed, and is a very necessary element for new and renewable energy generation. Thermal runaway fires can occur due to various causes in ESS. These fires can cause different damage depending on the building structure and other building disaster prevention facilities. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the fire risk by deriving the frequency of occurrence of the cause of fire in the ESS and checking the severity factor that determines the damage scale. In this study, fire risk assessment of ESS was performed using risk matrix method. The risk assessment was conducted based on data collected based on fire cases and field investigations. Through risk assessment, it was confirmed that the main causes of ESS fires were EMS/BMS errors and battery abnormalities. In addition, as the structure of the ESS building is fire-resistant, the fire compartment is set, and the separation distance between battery facilities is larger, the damage caused by a fire is smaller.
Abstract
Energy Storage System (ESS) is a facility that can store electricity and supply power when needed, and is a very necessary element for new and renewable energy generation. Thermal runaway fires can occur due to various causes in ESS. These fires can cause different damage depending on the building structure and other building disaster prevention facilities. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the fire risk by deriving the frequency of occurrence of the cause of fire in the ESS and checking the severity factor that determines the damage scale. In this study, fire risk assessment of ESS was performed using risk matrix method. The risk assessment was conducted based on data collected based on fire cases and field investigations. Through risk assessment, it was confirmed that the main causes of ESS fires were EMS/BMS errors and battery abnormalities. In addition, as the structure of the ESS building is fire-resistant, the fire compartment is set, and the separation distance between battery facilities is larger, the damage caused by a fire is smaller.
참고문헌 (15)
- "Article 30 of Fire Investigation and Reporting Regulations", ~ (2015)
- "What Is a Risk Assessment Matrix? And Why Is It Important?" (2021)[URL]
- Back, Dong Seung, "A Study on The Safety Measures against Fire through an ESS Fire Analysis", Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(6), pp.457~463 (2021)
- Blum, Andrew F., "Hazard Assessment of Lithium Ion Battery Energy Storage Systems", pp.60~82 (2016), NFPA
- "Chemical Risk Assessment Manual", KOSHA, 19~ (2012)
- ESS Fire Accident Investigation Result Report, "ESS Fire Accident Investigation Team", 1~17 (2000)
- 김두현, "ETA를 이용한 에너지저장시스템의 위험성 평가", 한국안전학회지, 31(3), pp.34~41 (2016), 한국안전학회
- Kim, Man Geon, "A Study on the Cause and Prevention of BESS Fire", Journal of Korean Institute of Fire Investigation, 38, pp.73~92 (2019)
- "Guidelines on Risk Analysis Methods", KOSHA GUIDE X-19-2012, 4~9 (2012)
- NFPA, "Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations", NFPA 921 2021 Edition, 51~ (2021)
- "Fire Safety Standards for Electrical Storage Facilities Article 2", NFSC 607, ~
- 박광묵, "화재현황 및 현장조사를 통한 ESS의 화재 위험성 연구", 한국화재소방학회 논문지, 32(6), pp.91~99 (2018), 한국화재소방학회[DOI]
- Public-Private Joint ESS Fire Accident Cause Investigation Committee, "Results of Cause Investigation of ESS Fire Accidents", 1~8 (2019)
- "Safety Inspection Manual", KFPA, 3~32 (2018)
- 신상식, "확률 기반의 위험등급평가 객관화 방안", 품질경영학회지, 41(3), pp.465~474 (2013), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]