본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전자정보교환(Truncation)에 의한 어음ㆍ수표의 지급제시

Presentment for Payment by the Check and Bill Truncation System in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The transportation of checks and bill or other items from a depositary bank through one or more collecting banks to the payor bank involves a great deal of expense and time. “Electronic presentment” or “check truncation” enables collecting banks to shorten the collection process by utilizing modern electronic means to transfer an item’s content. An item can be retained at the depositary bank, or at any desired intermediary bank, while a demand for payment is forwarded electronically to the payor bank. The bank retaining the item then holds the item for a short period of time for return to the drawer upon his request. After a short period of retention, the bank microfilms and then destroys the item. In U.S.A, the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check 21 Act or Check 21 or the Act), was enacted on October 28, 2003, and becomes effective on October 28, 2004. The Check 21 Act authorizes a new negotiable instrument called a “substitute check,” which is a paper reproduction of an original check, and provides that a properly prepared substitute check is the legal equivalent of an original check. The Act facilitates electronic check exchange by enabling banks to sort and deliver checks electronically and, where necessary, to create legally equivalent substitute checks for presentment to banks that have not agreed to accept checks electronically. Also in Korea, Revised Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes Act Art. 38(3), Art. 40(4) induced the truncation system as follows ; Such presentment for payment prescribed in paragraph (2) is considered finished, when a financial institution entrusted with collection of a bill of exchange by a holder electronically prepare items to be filled out on the bill of exchange via information processing system in the of electronic information, and such information is transferred to a clearing-house and then inputted into information processing system of such clearing-house. And Check Act, Art. 31(2), Art. 35(2) also have a similar contents. But these Acts have a several problems. Namely it is as follows ; the effects of presentment for payment, the risks of fraud and alteration of original instrument, consumer’s protection suffered a loss associated with the poor quality of the converted image file and a mistaken informations. Therefore this paper proposed that the related provisions should be revised or filled up.

Abstract

The transportation of checks and bill or other items from a depositary bank through one or more collecting banks to the payor bank involves a great deal of expense and time. “Electronic presentment” or “check truncation” enables collecting banks to shorten the collection process by utilizing modern electronic means to transfer an item’s content. An item can be retained at the depositary bank, or at any desired intermediary bank, while a demand for payment is forwarded electronically to the payor bank. The bank retaining the item then holds the item for a short period of time for return to the drawer upon his request. After a short period of retention, the bank microfilms and then destroys the item. In U.S.A, the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check 21 Act or Check 21 or the Act), was enacted on October 28, 2003, and becomes effective on October 28, 2004. The Check 21 Act authorizes a new negotiable instrument called a “substitute check,” which is a paper reproduction of an original check, and provides that a properly prepared substitute check is the legal equivalent of an original check. The Act facilitates electronic check exchange by enabling banks to sort and deliver checks electronically and, where necessary, to create legally equivalent substitute checks for presentment to banks that have not agreed to accept checks electronically. Also in Korea, Revised Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes Act Art. 38(3), Art. 40(4) induced the truncation system as follows ; Such presentment for payment prescribed in paragraph (2) is considered finished, when a financial institution entrusted with collection of a bill of exchange by a holder electronically prepare items to be filled out on the bill of exchange via information processing system in the of electronic information, and such information is transferred to a clearing-house and then inputted into information processing system of such clearing-house. And Check Act, Art. 31(2), Art. 35(2) also have a similar contents. But these Acts have a several problems. Namely it is as follows ; the effects of presentment for payment, the risks of fraud and alteration of original instrument, consumer’s protection suffered a loss associated with the poor quality of the converted image file and a mistaken informations. Therefore this paper proposed that the related provisions should be revised or filled up.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 이철송, "어음ㆍ수표법" (2010), 박영사
  2. 정찬형, "어음ㆍ수표법" (2009), 박영사
  3. 박성기, "미국통일상법전" (2006), 법문사
  4. 김문재, "어음·手票上에서의 善意支給者의 保護範圍", 상사법연구, 26(1), pp.281~313 (2007), 한국상사법학회
  5. 백미연, "국내외 수표 전자정보교환(Truncation)제도 도입 현황, in 지급결제와 기술정보", 지급결제와 기술정보 (2005)
  6. 백미연, "미국의 ACH(Automated Clearing House)서비스 제공 현황", 지급결제와 기술정보 (2006), 지급결제와 기술정보
  7. 이철송, "전자어음의 어음성", 인터넷법률, (24) (2004), 법무부
  8. 어음법 일부 개정법률안 및 手票法일부 개정법률안 심사보고서, "국회 법제사법위원회", ~ (2007)
  9. 어음법 일부개정법률안 및 手票法일부개정법률안 검토보고서, "임중호", 국회 법제사법위원회, ~ (2006)
  10. 洪晋熙, "한국과 일본에서의 전자어음과 전자채권", 선진상사법률연구, (30), pp.105~132 (2005), 법무부
  11. 농협중앙회, "어음정보교환 전국확대 시행, 자금44107-1484, (2010. 10. 22.)", ~ (2010)
  12. 전국은행연합회 수신전문위원회, "예금거래기본약관", ~ (2009)
  13. 금융결제원, "어음교환업무규약 및 시행세칙" (2010)
  14. Lary Lawrence, "Payment Systems" (2010), Thomson Reuters
  15. Michael H. Moskow, "Implementing the Check 21 Act: Potential risks facing banks", Chicago Fed Letter, (217) (2005), FRB OF CHICAGO
  16. Report to the Congress on the Check Clearing for the century 21st Act, "Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System", ~ (2007)
  17. Benjamin Geva, "Recent International Developments in the Law of Negotiable Instruments and Payment and Settlement Systems", Texas International Law Jounral, 42, pp.685~ (2007)
  18. Gregory C. Cook, "A PRIMER ON APPLYING ARTICLES 3 AND 4 TO THE TEN MOST COMMON CHECK DISPUTES", Ala. Law, 70, pp.278~ (2009)
  19. "The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, in Public Law 108-100", 108th Congress
  20. "F.R.B., Regulation CC", ~ (2009)
  21. NACHA, "ACH Operating Rules" (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)