본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본소년법 적용연령(상한기준) 인하에 대한 일본 학계의 반대성명과 시사점

Japan’s opposition debate on lowering the application age of Juvenile Law and its implications

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

.

Abstract

In June 2015, Japan enabled people above the age of 18 to vote while they had age over 20 could before, by legal establishment of 「Partial Amendment to Public Official Election Act」. This act regulates to take necessary legislative measures by reviewing civil law(1896, article 89), juvenile law(1948, article 168), and other legislation’s regulation according to the article 11 of the supplementary provision. And so, Ministry of Justice(Japan) submitted Civil Law Amendment, which includes lowering the age requirement of adult hood by under 20 to under 18, to a National Assembly, which then passed by the House of Representatives in March 13, 2018 waiting to be enforced, and actively reviewing juvenile law to be applied under the age of 18 rather than 20. Discussion related to the amendment of juvenile law is always been raised after the serious incident by a juvenile. They say that lowering the age of being an adult hood that relates to the juvenile law is due to the submitting of Public Official Election Act to National Assembly. But in fact, incident of murdering first year middle school boy by some 18 year olds that occurred in Kawasaki(川崎) is the real reason. Whenever such serious juvenile incidents occur, medias are continually raising opinions that juvenile law is unfit to present situations, and they strongly insist to amend juvenile law. However, 114 Japan researchers of criminal law and juvenile law announced “Statement of Criminal Law Researcher’s Oppositions to the Proposal of Lowering the Limit of Application Regarding the Juvenile Law”(少年法適用対象年齢の引下げに反対す る刑事法研究者の声明) to strongly oppose lowering the limit of application in juvenile law. Recent arguments about amendment and disposal of juvenile law in South Korea is, as it's mentioned earlier in introduction, related to a incidents of serious crime by juvenile. This paper handles with examinations of main basis of arguments and opinions about Japan academia’s opposition statement, and implications regarding South Korea’s disposal and amendment of juvenile law.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 川出敏裕, "少年法" (2015), 有斐閣
  2. 丸山雅夫, "少年法講義" (2017), 成文堂
  3. 山口直也, "新時代の比較少年法" (2017), 成文堂
  4. 內匠舞, "少年法の適⽤年齢引下げをめぐる議論", 調査と情報, (963) (2017), 国⽴国会図書館
  5. 浜井浩一, "少年法成人年齢の引下げを巡る議論の問題点と課題", 季刊刑事弁護, (84) (2015)
  6. 丸山雅夫, "少年法適用年齢の引下げ批判", 名城法学, 67(1) (2017), 名城大学法学会
  7. 守屋克彦, "少年法改正の歴史と年齢の引下げ", 法律時報, 90(4) (2018)
  8. "少年法の適用年齢 引下げを語る前に-なぜ私たちは引下げに反対するのか"[URL]
  9. "成年年齢に関する提言" (2015)[URL]
  10. "少年法"[URL]
  11. "소년법 이대로 괜찮은가? 어차피 처벌도 안받는데.. 소년법 논란 가열" (2018)[URL]
  12. "형사 미성년 연령 14→13세로 하향 연내 추진" (2018)[URL]
  13. "소년법 적용대상연령의 인하에 반대하는 형사법연구자의 성명(少年法適用対象年齢の引下げに反対する刑事法研究者の声明)"[URL]
  14. "소년법 개정 논란 형벌이 정답일까" (2018)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)