본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

변호사의 비밀유지의무

A Study on lawyers’ duty of maintain confidentiality

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Attorney-at-law Act of Korea provides that no attorney-at-law or former Attorney-at-law shall disclose any confidential matter that he/she has learned in the course of performing his/her duties. Provided, That the same shall not apply to cases where such disclosure of confidential matter is especially prescribed otherwise by Acts(Article 26). And, The Bill of Morality for Attorney of Korea provides that Lawyers can disclose information revealed in confidence by clients if it is necessary to defend themselves against accusations of malpractice and public interest(The Rule 23). Lawyers’ duty of maintain confidentiality is one of the most important, obligations to their clients that lawyers undertake. They must not disclose such information to anyone else, use it to the clients’ detriment, or take advantage of that information in any way. I will try to make sense of the duty of confidentiality and its limits. There are two main sources that place obligations of confidentiality on lawyers: the law of evidence(Criminal Procedure Act) and the professional rules(The Bill of Morality for Attorney). Under evidentiary rules, lawyers are entitled and required to keep confidential all communications between clients and themselves that pertain to the giving of legal advice and assistance. This is a privilege to the client, and it applies regardless of whether litigation is involved or is imminent. The professional duty of confidentiality is broader than the attorney-client privilege of evidence law. The professional duty protects nearly all information related to the representation, whatever its source; the privilege extends only to information transmitted directly between client and lawyer. While the duty is fundamental, it is not absolute. There are limits to the scope of the duty.

Abstract

Attorney-at-law Act of Korea provides that no attorney-at-law or former Attorney-at-law shall disclose any confidential matter that he/she has learned in the course of performing his/her duties. Provided, That the same shall not apply to cases where such disclosure of confidential matter is especially prescribed otherwise by Acts(Article 26). And, The Bill of Morality for Attorney of Korea provides that Lawyers can disclose information revealed in confidence by clients if it is necessary to defend themselves against accusations of malpractice and public interest(The Rule 23). Lawyers’ duty of maintain confidentiality is one of the most important, obligations to their clients that lawyers undertake. They must not disclose such information to anyone else, use it to the clients’ detriment, or take advantage of that information in any way. I will try to make sense of the duty of confidentiality and its limits. There are two main sources that place obligations of confidentiality on lawyers: the law of evidence(Criminal Procedure Act) and the professional rules(The Bill of Morality for Attorney). Under evidentiary rules, lawyers are entitled and required to keep confidential all communications between clients and themselves that pertain to the giving of legal advice and assistance. This is a privilege to the client, and it applies regardless of whether litigation is involved or is imminent. The professional duty of confidentiality is broader than the attorney-client privilege of evidence law. The professional duty protects nearly all information related to the representation, whatever its source; the privilege extends only to information transmitted directly between client and lawyer. While the duty is fundamental, it is not absolute. There are limits to the scope of the duty.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 김재원, "변호사의 기본의무", 박영사
  2. 박상근, "변호사의 직업윤리와 의무" (2007), 법률가의 윤리와 책임
  3. 이상원, "주요 국가의 변호사 윤리규범" (2011), 도서출판 소화
  4. 박휴상, "법조윤리" (2010), fides
  5. 손용근, "주석 신민사소송법(Ⅴ)" (2004), 한국사법행정학회
  6. 이상수, "법조윤리의 이론과 실제" (2010), 서강대학교 출판부
  7. 정선주, "사내변호사의 지위와 증언거부권", 인권과 정의, (420), pp.79~92 (2011), 대한변호사협회
  8. 정인진, "변호사의 비밀유지의무", 저스티스, (104)통권 : 104, pp.136~162 (2008), 한국법학원
  9. 정형근, "법조윤리강의" (2011), 박영사
  10. 정형근, "변호사법상 법무법인ㆍ법무법인(유한)ㆍ법무조합의 책임에 관한 연구", 경희법학, 45(1), pp.187~219 (2010), 법학연구소
  11. 정형근, "변호사의 보수에 관한 고찰", 법조, 59(6)통권 : 645, pp.213~249 (2010), 법조협회
  12. 정형근, "변호사와 의뢰인의 수임관계에 관한 고찰", 외법논집, 34(4), pp.209~222 (2010), 법학연구소
  13. 정형근, "변호사의 직업윤리에 대한 고찰", 법조, 58(6)통권 : 633, pp.278~324 (2009), 법조협회
  14. 최진안, "법조윤리" (2010), 세창출판사
  15. 전광석, "한국헌법론 제7판" (2011), 집현재
  16. A.C. Hutchinson, "Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility" (2006), Irwin Law
  17. American Bar Association, "ABA Compendium of professional responsibility rules and standards" (2007), American Bar Association
  18. Cannon, Therese A., "Ethics and professional responsibility for paralegals" (2008), Aspen Publishers
  19. Feuerich, "Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung" (2008), Vahlen
  20. Fred Phillips, "Ethics of the legal profession : a new order" (2004), Cavendish PUB
  21. Geoffrey C, "The law and ethics of lawyering" (2010), Foundation Press
  22. Joseph G, "The Lawyer’s Calling" (1999), IVP
  23. Ronald E. Mallen, "Legal malpractice(2)" (1989), West Pub
  24. W. Bradley Wendel, "Professional responsibility" (2007), Publishers
  25. 川端和治, "守秘義務" (2005), 法曹の倫理と責任(上)
  26. 日本辯護士連合會調査室, "條解 辯護士法" (2009), 弘文堂
  27. 田中紘三, "辯護士の役割と倫理" (2004), 商事法務
  28. 加藤新太郞, "辯護士倫理" (2006), 有斐閣
  29. 高中正彦, "法曹倫理講義" (2005), 民事法硏究會
  30. 高中正彦, "辯護士法槪說" (2006), 三省堂
  31. 更田義彦, "守秘義務" (2007), 現代の法曹倫理
  32. 森際康友, "법조の倫理" (2005), 名古屋大學出版會

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)