사회보장법의 권리론적 해석체계 정립방안
Establishing an Interpreting System-based on Rights of Social Security Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 논문은 사회보장법의 권리론적 해석체계 정립방안에 관하여, 크게 3가지의쟁점을 다루었다. 먼저 사회보장법의 권리론적해석체계의 필요성이다. 이는 ① 실정법적 해석체계, ② 급여중심 해석체계, ③ 행정법적 해석체계 등 기존 해석체계의 내용과 문제점을 검토함으로써 그 한계를 극복하기 위하여 사회보장법을권리론적 관점에서 바라보아야 한다는 점을 주장하였다. 둘째, 사회보장청구권의 법적 성질에 관하여 ① 프로그램적 규정설, ② 추상적 권리설의문제점을 분석하고 구체적 권리로 인정하여야 하는 이유를 주장하였다. 마지막으로 사회보장청구권의 권리론 해석체계의 정립을 위하여는, 헌법개정을 통하여 명확히 사회보장청구권을 규정하고, 구체적인 세부권리를 ① 각종 사회적 재해에대한 보상청구권, ② 생활무능력자의 기본생활보장청구권, ③ 특별보호대상자의 특별한 보호청구권, ④ 기타 사회보장청구권 등으로 해석하는 방안을 제시하였다.
Abstract
What was different about the recent presidential election was that, unlike the previous ones, there were a lot of promises made regarding the improvement of social welfare system. In modern-day welfare states, Social Law, such as labor law and social security law, are said to have as much powerful effect on people’s leaving as civil law and commercial law, the representative categories of Civil Law. However,the idea of securing people’s social rights has not been utilized by the nations until the end of World War II and does not have an organized standard or ‘system’ of its application. Besides, the political,economic and academic differences among the nations who put the vague idea into law, along with its distinct history of legislation in each country, have made it all the more difficult for most of the people to be fully aware of what the idea really was. In Korea the situation is even worse. As the proper interpretive system has not been firmly established, the legal coverage provided by the social security law stand far below average. The quality and the number of research findings on social security law also fall too short. As we are still stagnant at the first stage of effective legislation of social security system, our nation is in desperate need of a system that could help us come up with better legal mechanism. The biggest problem is that we are still at the state where we tend to not look at social security law as the collective idea of securing the rights of every man, but as individual provisions that have no relation to one another. The legal interpretation on social security law so far has been made from the perspective of ① current law and ② administrative law, ③ based on the benefits of those who called for the law to protect his/her own rights. Korea is developing into a decent welfare state. The government has set aside more than 10 trillion won for welfare from the 2013’s overall budget(342 trillion won). Upon entering the era like this, it is essential that we get out of the old-fashioned way of accepting social rights of the people, and establish firm foundation of social security. Finding out how a citizen’s right of claim for social security holds its legitimacy would be a start. Article 34, section 1 of the constitution stipulates the right for every citizen to live worthy as a human being, and section 2 specifies the duty of the government to secure its citizen’s social security and improve social welfare. Strictly speaking, although we were able to infer the idea of social security out of the existing legal statements, there were no specific article or clause that made it official. Thus, it is required that some constitutional reform be made to lend sufficient weight to the legal effect of social security rights. What might emerge as the following task is specifying the details that constitute the social security rights. The details will cover guaranteeing ① the right to claim for compensation in case of social risk,② the right to live with at least basic living in lacks of earning ability, ③ the right to claim speciallegal/financial protection and others.
참고문헌 (38)
- 고명석, "인권과 사회복지" (2011), 대왕사
- 곽노현, "사회보장법" (2009), 한국방송통신대학교 출판부
- 구병삭, "신헌법원론" (1996), 박영사
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2001), 법문사
- 김문현, "사회적 기본권의 법적 성격, In 헌법판례 100선" (2012), 법문사
- 김유성, "한국사회보장법론" (2002), 법문사
- 김유성, "공적부조제도의 의의와 문제점, In 김진웅 교수 회갑 기념 논문집: 노동법과 노동정책" (1985), 일신사
- 김철수, "헌법학개론" (2000), 박영사
- 김철수, "헌법개설" (2012), 박영사
- 문홍주, "한국헌법" (1992), 해암사
- 박승두, "사회보장법" (2005), 중앙경제사
- 박승두, "사회보장법 강의" (2012), 법률SOS
- 박찬운, "사회권의 성격과 사법구제 가능성 -헌법재판에서의 사법구제 가능성을 중심으로-", 법학논총, 25(3), pp.19~44 (2008), 법학연구소
- 윤재만, "社會國家原理의 理論的 根據 및 實現方法論", 공법학연구, 12(3), pp.55~82 (2011), 한국비교공법학회
- 이상광, "사회법" (2002), 박영사
- 이상윤, "사회보장법" (2012), 법문사
- 이성환, "사회권의 법적 성격", 법학논총, 22(2), pp.133~166 (2010), 법학연구소
- 전광석, "사회보장법학" (1993), 한림대학교 출판부
- 전광석, "한국사회보장법론" (2010), 법문사
- 최승원, "社會福祉權 小考", 지방자치법연구, 9(1), pp.177~189 (2009), 한국지방자치법학회
- 한상희, "사회권과 사법심사 ― 여전히 “생성중인 권리” 의 복권을 위하여 ―", 공법연구, 39(1), pp.93~133 (2010), 한국공법학회
- 허영, "헌법이론과 헌법" (2001), 박영사
- 허영, "한국헌법론" (1996), 박영사
- 加藤智章, "社會保障法" (2003), 有斐閣
- 菊池馨實, "社會保障の法理念" (2000), 有斐閣
- 西原道雄, "社會保障法" (1972), 有斐閣
- 西村健一郞, "社會保障法" (2003), 有斐閣
- 西村健一郞, "社會保障法" (2005), 有斐閣
- 小西國友, "社會保障法" (2001), 有斐閣
- 小川政亮, "權利としての社會保障" (1983), 勁草書房
- 秋元美世, "社會福祉の權利と思想" (2010), 日本圖書センタ-
- 五島貞次, "社會保障の原理" (1980), 文化書房博文社
- 吾妻光俊, "社會保障法" (1990), 有斐閣
- 窪田隼人, "現代社會保障法入門" (1993), 法律文化社
- 園部逸夫, "社會保障行政法" (1980)
- 遠藤昇三, "社會保障の權利論" (1995), 법률문화사
- 淸正寬, "社會保障法", 中央經濟社 (2000)
- 荒木誠之, "社會保障法" (1998), 靑林書院
