본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국군의 해외평화활동법률 제정에 관한 법적 고찰

A Legal Study on the Legislation of Dispatching Forces to Abroad Act

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This article aims to legislate the act of dispatching military to abroad and reviews its contents andprocedures. The article 5 of the constitutional law declares the principle of peace in the international society asone of the fundamental themes of the constitutional orders. Moreover, the article implies the government’sresponsibility for the international peace and security in the international community. Therefore, when theinternational society asks Korea of participation in international peace and security works, we have responsibilityto join the works within the capacity. For example, if the UN Security Counsel makes a resolution or decisionsfor the Peace Keeping Operation and demands the members states especially with designating Korea to dispatchKorean forces, we have strong responsibility to join the PKO as a member’s responsibility. The article 60 ofthe Constitution requires consents of the congress for dispatching military to abroad. There is only one domesticlaw for this article, PKO Act; however, PKO is just one of the case that the military goes to abroad. BesidesPKO, the collective self-defense, the UN Security Counsel resolution, the old enemy clause in UN Charter,anticipatory or preemptory self-defense, humanitarian intervention and protection of nationals in abroad in thecustomary international laws are the other example of it. This article suggests of new legislation which containsthe substance requirements and procedural requirement for dispatching military to abroad. This article alsoprovides three possible forms of the legislation and makes assessment of advantages and disadvantages. Finally,this article make underlines the new legislation is necessary not only to take a reading role in the internationalcommunity but also to calm the political controversy which repeats in every dispatching forces to abroad.

Abstract

This article aims to legislate the act of dispatching military to abroad and reviews its contents andprocedures. The article 5 of the constitutional law declares the principle of peace in the international society asone of the fundamental themes of the constitutional orders. Moreover, the article implies the government’sresponsibility for the international peace and security in the international community. Therefore, when theinternational society asks Korea of participation in international peace and security works, we have responsibilityto join the works within the capacity. For example, if the UN Security Counsel makes a resolution or decisionsfor the Peace Keeping Operation and demands the members states especially with designating Korea to dispatchKorean forces, we have strong responsibility to join the PKO as a member’s responsibility. The article 60 ofthe Constitution requires consents of the congress for dispatching military to abroad. There is only one domesticlaw for this article, PKO Act; however, PKO is just one of the case that the military goes to abroad. BesidesPKO, the collective self-defense, the UN Security Counsel resolution, the old enemy clause in UN Charter,anticipatory or preemptory self-defense, humanitarian intervention and protection of nationals in abroad in thecustomary international laws are the other example of it. This article suggests of new legislation which containsthe substance requirements and procedural requirement for dispatching military to abroad. This article alsoprovides three possible forms of the legislation and makes assessment of advantages and disadvantages. Finally,this article make underlines the new legislation is necessary not only to take a reading role in the internationalcommunity but also to calm the political controversy which repeats in every dispatching forces to abroad.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 이장희, "한국의 PKO활동 참여와 국제법", 대한국제법학회논총, 39(1) (1994)
  2. 성재호, "UN 平和維持活動의 根據와 限界", 저스티스, 69, pp.192~204 (2002), 한국법학원
  3. 제성호, "평화유지활동(PKO)을 위한 국군의 해외 파병과 국회 동의권", 중앙법학, 9(1), pp.117~147 (2007), 중앙법학회
  4. 오병선, "인도적 간섭의 적법성과 정당성", 국제법학회논총, 54(3), pp.245~271 (2009), 대한국제법학회
  5. 박기갑, "국제법상 보호책임" (2011), 삼우사
  6. 김부찬, "인도적 개입과 보호책임 -인도적 개입 논의에 대한 보호책임의 의의와 한계를 중심으로-", 법학논총, 31(3), pp.609~640 (2011), 법학연구소
  7. 서철원, "보호책임의 내용과 법적 성격", 법학논총, 27, pp.153~177 (2012), 법학연구소
  8. 김대순, "국제법론(17판)" (2013), 삼영사
  9. 정인섭, "신국제법강의" (2013), 박영사
  10. Phillip Bobbitt, "War Powers: An Essay on John Hart Ely’s War and Responsibility:Constitutional Lessons of Vietnam and Its Aftermath", Michigan Law Quarterly, 92(6) (1994)
  11. The Responsibility to Protect: International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, "The International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty", ~ (2001)
  12. A. Cassese, "International Law" (2005), Oxford university press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)