INNOVATION UNDER THE THREAT OF DIRECT FOREIGN INVESTMENT
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We examine the implication of direct and indirect foreign competition on domestic innovation decision. In most of the existing theoretical analyses the foreign firms are assumed to enter the domestic-country market as an exporter and thus are subject to a tariff duty imposed by the local government. We consider a broader setting where the foreign firm also has the option of setting up a production unit in the domestic country to supply output to the domestic country. This enables it to avoid the tariff that it faces due to export. Once we allow for such a strategy option for the foreign firm, competition becomes more direct and intense since tariffs no longer discount for the technological inferiority of home firms. We show that innovation by the home firm will be discouraged at high tariffs under the threat of DFI. Again at low tariff rates exports by the foreign firm make market competition more intense and reduce the incentive for innovation. Hence the home firm always (never) innovates at low (high) R&D cost whatever be the tariff rate. For intermediate R&D cost the home firm innovates if the foreign firm opts for exports.
Abstract
We examine the implication of direct and indirect foreign competition on domestic innovation decision. In most of the existing theoretical analyses the foreign firms are assumed to enter the domestic-country market as an exporter and thus are subject to a tariff duty imposed by the local government. We consider a broader setting where the foreign firm also has the option of setting up a production unit in the domestic country to supply output to the domestic country. This enables it to avoid the tariff that it faces due to export. Once we allow for such a strategy option for the foreign firm, competition becomes more direct and intense since tariffs no longer discount for the technological inferiority of home firms. We show that innovation by the home firm will be discouraged at high tariffs under the threat of DFI. Again at low tariff rates exports by the foreign firm make market competition more intense and reduce the incentive for innovation. Hence the home firm always (never) innovates at low (high) R&D cost whatever be the tariff rate. For intermediate R&D cost the home firm innovates if the foreign firm opts for exports.
참고문헌 (15)
- Acharyya,R, "Liberalization, Innovation and Exports", Economic and Political Weekly, 9 (1995)
- Bouet, A, "Research and Development, Voluntary Export Restriction and Tariffs", European Economic Review, 45(2), pp.323~336 (2001)
- Clemenz,G, "International R&D Competition and Trade Policy", Journal of International Economics, 28, pp.93~113 (1990)
- Dasgupta, P, "Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity” in Hanuskh-Horst", Intellectual Legacies in Modern Economics, 4 (1999), American International Distribution Corporation
- Guoyong, L, "Foreign Investment, Competition and Innovation: The Emergent System of Innovation in China’s Telecom Equipment Industry", Communication and Strategies, 52, pp.115~138 (2003)
- Hubert, F, "Inward Investment and Technical Progress in the United Kingdom Manufacturing Sector", Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48(2), pp.134~147 (2001)
- Kamien, M.-I, "Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey in Robert", Microeconomics: Theoretical and Applied, 2 (1991), Aldushot, UK and Bookfield
- Krugman,P.R, "Import Protection as Export Promotion: International Competition in Presence of Oligopolies and Economies of Scale", Monopolistic Competition and International Trade (1984), Oxford University Press
- Kumar,N, "Economic Reforms and Their Macro Economic Impact", Economic and Political Weekly, 33(22), pp.1321~1329 (2000)
- Kumar, N, "Liberalisation, Foreign Direct Investment Flows and Development: Indian Experience in the 1990s", Economic and Political Weekly, 2 (2005)
- Marjit, S, "India’s Exports- An Analytical Study" (1997), Oxford University Press
- Neven, D, "Technology Sourcing and FDI in the EC: An Empirical Evaluation", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14, pp.543~560 (1996)
- Reitzes, J.D, "The Impact of Quotas and Tariffs on Strategic R&D Behaviour", International Economic Review, 32(4), pp.985~1007 (1991)
- Rodrik,D, "Closing the Productivity Gap: Does Trade Liberalization Really Help", Trade policy, Industrialization and Development: New Perspectives (1992), Clarendon Press
- Schumpeter,J, "Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy" (1943), Allen and Unwin
