본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

EU 私法의 전개 - EU Consumer Acquis and the European Contract Law -

The development of the EU private law - EU Consumer Acquis and the European Contract Law -

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

본 논문의 목적은 유럽 사법의 발전에 대한 간략한 개요를 제공하는 것에 있다. 이제까지 유럽의 사법의 법적 상황은 두 방향에서 전개되어 왔다. 즉 EU 지침을 통한 소비자보호법 영역에서의 소비자 계약법의 전개와 일반 사법(특히 계약법)을 평준화 내지 통일화하기 위한 작업은 서로 밀접한 관련이 있지만 별개의 프로젝트로 발전되어 왔다. 제Ⅱ장에서는 소비자법에 관한 아키 코미노테의 성립 및 전개를 더듬어, 현재의 구조적 결함에 대한 기존 논의를 살펴본다. 그리고 제Ⅲ장에서는, 유럽계약법원칙(PECL) 등 유럽 계약법상의 작업을 소개한다. 이 원칙은 생성 중에 있는 유럽 계약법의 핵심 부분을 나타내고 있으며, 현재는 유럽 민법전 연구그룹이 이것을 한층 더 발전시키고 있다. 유럽계약법원칙은 처음에는 순수하게 사적인 발의에 의해 전개되어 왔지만, 현재는 경제계 및 실무계에 널리 수용되고 있으며, 이 원칙이 유럽연합에 있어서의 계약법의 평준화에 있어서 가지는 의의는 거의 다툼의 여지가 없는 것이다. 그러나 문제는 PECL이 기존 소비자 보호법을 완전히 도외시하고 있다는 점이다. 따라서 PECL이 어느 정도 유럽 소비자 보호법의 구조적 결함의 해소에 도움이 될 수 있는지에 대해 의심받고 있다. 제Ⅳ장에서는 이에 대한 유럽위원회의 대응을, 특히 현재 이루어지고 있는 여러 제안, 그리고 특히 유럽 계약법을 실현하기 위한 액션 플랜을 자세히 살펴본다. 여기서 밝혀지는 것은 위의 두 전개와 관련된 제안, 즉 소비자 보호법의 현대화와 계약법의 평준화가 평행 하면서도 서로 완전히 별개는 아닌 형태로 추구되고 있다는 것이다. 제Ⅴ장에서는 그를 통한 ‘작업 1’(공통기준)을, 제Ⅵ장에서는 ‘작업 2’(아키 코미나테의 개정작업과 그 결실)를 정리하고, 제Ⅶ장을 통하여 작업 2의 결실이라 할 수 있는 소비자권리에 관한 지침에 대해 살펴본다. 이어 이들을 통합하여 제안하고 있는 ‘선택적 유럽 공통 매매법 규칙(안)’ 작업의 개요를 제Ⅷ장에서, 그리고 그 평가 및 의의를 바탕으로 앞으로의 전개에 대해 제Ⅸ장에서 전망한다.

Abstract

The purpose in this paper is to provide a brief overview of development in European private law. Judicial situation of the modern European private law consists of two parallel temporal features. The development of EU contract law and EU consumer contract law are two related but distinct projects. Part Ⅱ in this article aims at placing the subject in the context of the EU consumer acquis(acquis communautaire). During the 1980s and 1990s, the resulting legislation was particular in its scope, targeted in its aims, and its main technique was the harmonization by directive of aspects of the national contract laws of Member States. Although consumer law forms a reasonably detailed set of EU rules on private law and, piecemeal developments, a lack of coordination between different areas have provoked criticism about its incoherence. In recent years, therefore, there has been increased focus on the coherence of European Union private law, starting with the field of consumer contract law. But even beyond this, steps have been taken towards increased coherence in contract law generally. Because of its potential to improve the coherence of existing legislation in this field, as well as to ensure that future legislation would fit better with existing measures, the EU Commission has been working towards a ‘common frame of reference’ intended to promote the coherence of private law in the EU. Part Ⅲ in this article describes the unification movement in the area of the private law. The piecemeal legislation of the Community cannot cope with divergencies resulting from the context of national laws and in particular with differences in structure, principles and concepts. The harmonization of the general framework which accommodates specific instruments could be carried out by legal scholarship. The important facets of the process are the contributions of legal scholarship which has turned to the analysis of general principles of private law in various fields. The Commission on European Contract Law has certainly made the greatest progress in its work. Part Ⅳ - Ⅵ in this article deals with the European Commission's response. The European Commission has undertaken a series of initiatives aimed at increasing the overall coherence of European contract law:An Action Plan of the European Commission issued in February 2003 moves the development of the European contract law into a new phase. Following up the pan-European discussion, considering problems which result from differences among the national contract laws concerning the uniform application of EC contract law, the Action Plan goes a step further by regarding the academic examination of European contract law as an indispensable core component of further progress towards a coherent European contract law. The Commission is striving to erect the “common frame of reference(CFR)”. It aims to establish common principles and terminology in the field of European contract law. Over the last decade, increasing dissatisfaction with this technique prompted a move towards ‘full harmonization’ in EU consumer law. In 2008, the Commission sought in its Consumer Rights Directive Proposal to extend ‘full harmonization’ to four of the most important directives in the consumer acquis, the proposal met with very considerable opposition. The Consumer Rights Directive as promulgated in late 2011 is therefore much reduced in scope, its provisions leaving aside almost entirely change to earlier (minimum harmonization) directives on unfair terms and consumer guarantees in sale. In this regard are discussed in part ⅦHowever, the Commission has recognised that it is not desirable to continue to adopt EU legislation in the same format. And, in this regard, the Green paper on policy options for progress towards a European contract law for consumers and businesses of 1 July 2010 marked a turning point at which the prospect of an optional instrument of contract law was given particular emphasis. In October 2011, the Commission proposed a new ‘opt in’ legal regime for the sale of goods. Part Ⅷ gives a description of the proposal for a Regulation on an optional Common European Sales Law. Finally, its evaluation and perspectives as a concluding remarks are mentioned(Part Ⅸ).

참고문헌 (20)

  1. "2005", 165
  2. Research Group on the Existing EC Private Law (Acquis Group), In Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law Draft Common Frame of Reference, "prepared by Study Group on a European Civil Code", pp.2009, Von Bar
  3. Jürgen Basedow, "Ein Gemeinsames Europäisches Kaufrecht für grenzübergreifende Verträge – Seine Bedeutung und Auswirkung auf freie Märkte", 한독법률학회 2012년 춘계학술대회 발표논문 (2012)
  4. "2012", 269
  5. Bénédicte Fauvarque-Cosson, "European Contract Law, Materials for a Common Frame of Reference" (2008), Terminology, Guiding Principles, Model Rules
  6. "2012", 76
  7. Matteo Fornasier, "≫28.≪ versus ≫2.Regime≪ - Kollisionsrechtliche Aspekte eines optionalen europäischen Vertragsrechts", RabelsZ, 76, pp.401~ (2012)
  8. "2011", 457
  9. Jens Koch, "Die Einheit der nationalen Rechtsordnung und die europäische Privatrechtsangleichung", JZ, 277 (2006)
  10. Ole Lando, "Comments and Questions Relating to the European Commission's Proposal for a Regulation on a Common European Sales Law", ERPL, 717 (2011)
  11. A Numbers Game – The Legal Basis for an Optional Instrument in European Contract Law, "Garry Low", Maastricht Faculty of Law, ~, pp.Working Paper No. 2012, 02
  12. Garry Low, "Unitas via Diversitas: Can the Common European Sales Law Harmonize Through Diversity?", Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 1 (2012)[DOI]
  13. Gary Low, "The Proposed Common European Sales Law: Have the Right Choices Been Made? Introduction to a special issue", Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 19, pp.3~ (2012)
  14. "2004", 103
  15. "2007", 121
  16. The Commission Proposal for a ‘Regulation on a Common European Sales Law (CESL)’ – Too Broad or Not Broad Enough?, "Hans-W. Micklitz", EUI, ~, pp.Working Papers LAW No. 2012, 04
  17. Viviane Reding, "The optional Common European Sales Law – Seizing the opportunity", Conference on European Tort Law (2011)
  18. Viviane Reding, "Warum Europa ein optionales Europäisches Vertragsrecht benötigt", ZEuP, 1 (2011)
  19. Reiner Schulze, "Gemeinsamer Referenzrahmen und acquis communautaire", Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht (ZEuP), 128 (2007)
  20. Marina Tamm, "Das Gemeinsame Europäische Kaufrecht als optionales Instrument- eine kritische Analyse zur Binnenmarktharmonisierungskompetenzder Kommission", VuR, 3 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)