AN EVALUATION OF DAVID RICARDO’S THEORY OF COMPARATIVE COSTS: DIRECT AND INDIRECT CRITIQUES
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Following Smith’s advocacy of free trade and competition, David Ricardo attempts to strengthen his theory of absolute advantage, which excludes from international trade countries which have no advantages over others, by eliminating this weakness. To do so, Ricardo introduces to the economics literature a theory of comparative cost advantage which includes countries that do not have absolute advantages in international trade. In Ricardo’s framework, these countries can still gain from free trade. We present direct and indirect critiques which reveal that their advocacy of free trade is questionable. In our direct critiques we find that Ricardo’s attempt is questionable for the following reasons. First, the scale of production of cloth in Portugal and that of wine in England equal 1 even though there is no reason to believe that two countries have the same scale of production for two different commodities. Second, it is argued that his theory is incomplete because it is based on particular numbers, does not determine the terms of trade, and does not take into account the unintended curtailment of demand in both countries, which in turn can make trade non-beneficial for both countries. In our indirect critiques, first we argue that Ricardo assumes the equality between the relative price and relative labor cost of two commodities even though they are different. Second, it is shown that the outcome of complete specialization in his theory prevents a country from specializing in the production of a commodity that could generate for itself a substantial profit in the long run, locking the country out of industrialization. We then point out that Samuelson who supports Ricardo’s theory to some extent does not consider in his proof the possible destruction of the domestic industry in the case of free trade, even though this might make domestic consumers worse off and also lock a country out of industrialization
Abstract
Following Smith’s advocacy of free trade and competition, David Ricardo attempts to strengthen his theory of absolute advantage, which excludes from international trade countries which have no advantages over others, by eliminating this weakness. To do so, Ricardo introduces to the economics literature a theory of comparative cost advantage which includes countries that do not have absolute advantages in international trade. In Ricardo’s framework, these countries can still gain from free trade. We present direct and indirect critiques which reveal that their advocacy of free trade is questionable. In our direct critiques we find that Ricardo’s attempt is questionable for the following reasons. First, the scale of production of cloth in Portugal and that of wine in England equal 1 even though there is no reason to believe that two countries have the same scale of production for two different commodities. Second, it is argued that his theory is incomplete because it is based on particular numbers, does not determine the terms of trade, and does not take into account the unintended curtailment of demand in both countries, which in turn can make trade non-beneficial for both countries. In our indirect critiques, first we argue that Ricardo assumes the equality between the relative price and relative labor cost of two commodities even though they are different. Second, it is shown that the outcome of complete specialization in his theory prevents a country from specializing in the production of a commodity that could generate for itself a substantial profit in the long run, locking the country out of industrialization. We then point out that Samuelson who supports Ricardo’s theory to some extent does not consider in his proof the possible destruction of the domestic industry in the case of free trade, even though this might make domestic consumers worse off and also lock a country out of industrialization
참고문헌 (32)
- Amsden,H.A, "Asia’s Next Giant, South Korea and Late Industrialization" (1989), Oxford University Press
- Bayard, O.T, "Reciprocity and Retaliation in U.S. Trade Policy", Institute for International Economics (1994)
- Beasley,W.G, "The Modern History of Japan" (1974), Praeger Publishers Inc
- Chipman, S.J, "A Survey of The Theory of International Trade: Part 1, The Classical Theory", Econometrica, 33(3) (1965)
- Clément, P, "Histoire de Colbert et de son Administration, Paris: Librairies académiques, Didier et Ce" (1874), Libraires-Éditeurs
- Grossman, G.M, "Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy" (1992), The MIT Press
- Hamilton,A, "Hamilton’s Report on Manufactures, in Arthur Harrison Cole ed., Industrial and Commercial Correspondence of Alexander Hamilton" (1968), Augustus M. Kelley Publishers
- Henderson,O.W, "The Industrial Revolution in Europe", pp.1815~1914 (1961), Quadrangle Books Inc
- Johnson,C, "MITI and The Japanese Miracle, The Growth of Industrial Policy", pp.1925~1975 (1982), Stanford University Press
- Kindleberger,P.C, "International Economics" (1973), Richard D. Irwin Inc
- List,F, "The National System of Political Economy", Longmans, 1841 (1928)
- Maneschi,A, "The True Meaning of David Ricardo’s Four Magic Numbers", Journal of International Economics, 62 (2004)
- Mathias, P, "The First Industrial Nation, An Economic History of Britain 1700-1914, 2nd edition" (1983), Methuen & Co. Ltd
- McLean, W.G, "Ingineering Mechanics" (1988), McGraw Hill
- Mill, J.S, "Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy" (1844), John W. Parker, West Strand
- Mill, J.S, "Principles of Political Economy, London, Parker, 1st ed., Reprint of the 9th ed., (W.J.Ashley ed.)" (1848), London, Longmans Green
- Pareto,V, "Manuel d'Economie Politique, Traduit de L'édition Italienne par Alfred Bonnet" (1909), V. Giard & E. Brière
- Pareto,V, "Manual of Political Economy, edited by Ann S. Schwier, and Alfred N. Page" (1971), The MacMillan Press Ltd
- Passinetti,L.L, "Lectures on the Theory of Production" (1977), Columbia University Press
- Ricardo,D, "Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Edited, with Introduction Essay, Notes and Appendices, by E.C.K. Gonner, M.A" (1911), G. Bell and Sons Ltd
- Ricardo,D, "Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Edited by Pierro Sraffa, and M.H. Dobb" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Ruffin, J.R, "David Ricardo’s Discovery of Comparative Advantage", History of Political Economy, 34(4) (2002)
- Samuelson,A.P, "The Gains from International Trade", The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science (1939)
- Samuelson,A.P, "The Gains from International Trade Once Again", The Economic Journal (1962)
- Samuelson,A.P, "The Way of an Economist, in the collected papers of Paul A. Samuelson, edited by R.C. Merton" (1972), MIT Press
- Smith, A, "The Wealth of Nations" (1937), Modern Library
- Sraffa,P, "An Alleged Correction of Ricardo", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 44 (1930)
- Steedman, I, "Fundamental Issues in Trade Theory" (1979), Martin
- Torrens, R, "The Economists Refuted" (1808), La Grange
- Torrens, R, "An Essay on the Corn Trade,London:J" (1815), J. Hatchard
- Viner,J, "Studies in the Theory of International Trade" (1937), Harper and Brothers Publishers
- Wells, A.D, "Physics, Schaum’s Outline Series" (1983), McGraw Hill