CSI 효과: 검사와 일반인의 비교

키워드

참고문헌 (27)

1. 주요 선진국의 과학적 수사기법의 도입과 활용방안 연구. 연구총서, "유혁상", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2004)
2. "공소사실 진실이라는 확신주어야"[URL]
3. Bornstein,B, "The ecological validity of jurysimulations: Is the jury still out?", Law andHuman Behavior, 23(1), pp.75~91 (1999)
4. Garrett, B. L, "Invalidforensic science testimony and wrongfulconvictions", Virginia Law Review, 95(1), pp.1~97 (2009)
5. Hans, V. P., "Media coverage oflaw: Its impact on juries and the public", American Behavioral Scientist, 35(2), pp.136~149 (1991)
6. Hallgrimsdotter, H. K., "Fallen women and rescued girls: Socialstigma and media narratives of the sexindustry in Victoria, B.C., from 1980 to 2005", Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 43(3), pp.265~280 (2005)
7. "RetrievedFebruary 15th, 2010"[URL]
8. Kim, Y. S., "Examining the “CSI-effect” in the cases ofcircumstantial evidence and eyewitnesstestimony: Multivariate and path analyses", Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, pp.452~460 (2009)
9. Koehler,J.J, "When are people persuaded byDNA match statistics?", Law and HumanBehavior, 25, pp.493~513 (2001)
10. Kovera,M.B, "The effects of general pretrialpublicity on juror decisions: An examination ofmoderators and mediating mechanisms", Law andHuman behavior, 26, pp.43~72 (2002)
11. Kovera, M. B., "The effects ofpeer review and evidence quality on judgeevaluations of psychological science: Are judgeseffective gatekeepers?", Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), pp.574~586 (2000)
12. Kovera, M. B., "Reasoning about scientific evidence:Effects of Juror gender and evidence quality onJuror decisions in a hostile work environmentcase", Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), pp.362~375 (1999)
13. Levett, L., "Theeffectiveness of opposing expert witnesses foreducating jurors about unreliable expert evidence", Law and Human Behavior, 32, pp.363~374 (2008)
14. Levett, L., "Psychologicalmediators of the effects of opposing experttestimony on juror decisions", Psychology, PublicPolicy, and Law, 15(2), pp.124~148 (2009)
15. Lieberman, J. D., "Gold versus Platinum: Dojurors recognize the superiority and limitations ofDNA evidence compared to other types offorensic evidence?", Psychology, Public Policy andLaw, 14(1), pp.27~62 (2008)
16. National Reserach Council, "Strengtheningforensic science in the United States:A pathforward" (2009), The National Academies Press
18. O'Neil, K. M., "Exploring the effects of attitudes toward thedeath penalty on capital sentencing verdicts", Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 10, pp.443~470 (2004)
19. Podlas,K, "The CSI effect: Exposing themedia myth", The Fordham Intellectual Property,Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 16, pp.429~465 (2006)
20. Pozzulo, J. D., "The influence of identification decision and DNA evidence onjuror decision making", Journal of Applied SocialPsychology, 39(9), pp.2069~2088 (2009)
21. Reardon, M. C., "A new definition of the CSI effect", Posterpresented at the annual American Psychology &Law Society conference: Adelaide, Autralia. (2007)
22. Robbers,M.L, "Blinded by science: Thesocial construction of reality in forensictelevision shows and its effect on criminal jurytrial", Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(1), pp.84~102 (2008)
23. Saks,M.J.,Wissler,R.L, "Legal andpsychological bases of expert testimony: Surveysof the law and of jurors", Behavioral Sciencesand the Law, 2(4), pp.435~449 (1984)
24. Schklar, J., "Juror reactionsto DNA evidence: Error and expectancies", Lawand Human Behavior, 23(2), pp.159~184 (1999)
25. "Standard Terminology forExpressing Conclusions of Forensic Footwearand Tire Impression Examination"[URL]
26. Taroni, F., "Forensic science attrial", Jurimetrics, 37, pp.327~337 (1997)
27. Vergeer, M., "Exposure to Newspapers and Attitudes towardEthnic Minorities: A Longitudinal Analysis", Howard Journal of Communications, 11(2), pp.127~143 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천