후기 근대 세대 간 갈등과 공생의 전망
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Generational conflict has likely existed in all societies and probably been felt most keenly by youth who sometimes felt the older generation to be highly unreasonable and tyrannical as they themselves struggled to become adults. Generational conflict also appears inevitable given how much of the economic resources and social-political authority are concentrated in the hands of the older generation, and how, with social change, the younger and older generations inevitably grow up with different experiences and forms of consciousness. In this paper, I focus on the transformation of generational relations in modernity from conflict to coexistence and compromise. In order to initiate such a discussion, I focus on the case of South Korean society from 1990s-2000s. In the 1990s, as in the discourse of the “new generation,” the conflict between the generations became more accentuated as Korean society became a full-blown consumer society and emerging democracy. Rebelling against their parents, the younger generation began to create a new culture. However, in the late 2000, it is difficult to find traces of these past efforts. Even as the younger generation become college students, they become wedded to the values of a “filial generation,” unwilling to challenge their parents. Instead of complaining about school, they expend vast effort subordinating themselves to the existing system and cultivating a stable and risk-free life. I consider the disappearance of the younger generation in the 1990s—who violently opposed their parents, ran away from their homes, contributed to the “classroom collapse,” and played a key role in creating diverse times and spaces within the mass consumer society—and, in their stead, the reappearance of dutiful and obedient “filial children” an important story to tell in relation to issues of gender and generation, along with class formation, in late modernity. As a particular story, the issue of generational conflict in contemporary South Korea is most easily connected to South Korea’s cultural traditions. Amore important connection, however, is found in the history of South Korea’s compressed modernization and late-developmentalist economy. Despite such cultural and historical particularities, the story of this Korean phenomenon still offers something for non-Korean readers in its complex imbrications with the recent waves of global change in the era of financial capitalism economic recession, hyper-competitive neoliberal order and youth unemployment.
Abstract
Generational conflict has likely existed in all societies and probably been felt most keenly by youth who sometimes felt the older generation to be highly unreasonable and tyrannical as they themselves struggled to become adults. Generational conflict also appears inevitable given how much of the economic resources and social-political authority are concentrated in the hands of the older generation, and how, with social change, the younger and older generations inevitably grow up with different experiences and forms of consciousness. In this paper, I focus on the transformation of generational relations in modernity from conflict to coexistence and compromise. In order to initiate such a discussion, I focus on the case of South Korean society from 1990s-2000s. In the 1990s, as in the discourse of the “new generation,” the conflict between the generations became more accentuated as Korean society became a full-blown consumer society and emerging democracy. Rebelling against their parents, the younger generation began to create a new culture. However, in the late 2000, it is difficult to find traces of these past efforts. Even as the younger generation become college students, they become wedded to the values of a “filial generation,” unwilling to challenge their parents. Instead of complaining about school, they expend vast effort subordinating themselves to the existing system and cultivating a stable and risk-free life. I consider the disappearance of the younger generation in the 1990s—who violently opposed their parents, ran away from their homes, contributed to the “classroom collapse,” and played a key role in creating diverse times and spaces within the mass consumer society—and, in their stead, the reappearance of dutiful and obedient “filial children” an important story to tell in relation to issues of gender and generation, along with class formation, in late modernity. As a particular story, the issue of generational conflict in contemporary South Korea is most easily connected to South Korea’s cultural traditions. Amore important connection, however, is found in the history of South Korea’s compressed modernization and late-developmentalist economy. Despite such cultural and historical particularities, the story of this Korean phenomenon still offers something for non-Korean readers in its complex imbrications with the recent waves of global change in the era of financial capitalism economic recession, hyper-competitive neoliberal order and youth unemployment.
참고문헌 (44)
- 고들리에,모리스, "인류학은서구의학문인가? 학술강좌자료집", ~ (2003)
- 김용민, "볼프강엔글러,전위로서의동독인들, In 독일통일과문학" (2010), 창비
- 한국 사회중산층 자녀세대들의 생애전략과 젠더차이에 관한연구, In 연세대 여성과노동문화학과 수업기말보고서, "김윤경", ~ (2010)
- 소비주체청소년,사생활을소비하다, In 2010년문화와경제수업기말보고서, "노지윤", ~ (2010)
- 마쯔모토하지메, "가난뱅이의역습" (2009), 이루
- 서동진, "자유의 의지 자기계발의의지" (2009), 돌베개
- 서명선, "혁명은 이렇게 조용히" (2009), 레디앙
- 세넷, "뉴캐피탈리즘" (2009), 위즈덤하우스
- 송호근, "위기의 청년세대" (2010), 나남
- 신명호, "왜 잘사는 집 아이는 공부를 잘하는가?", 박사, 사회복지학과, pp.2010
- 엄기호, "아무도 남을 돌보지마라" (2009), 낮은산
- 야마다마사히로, "프리터200만인에게내일은없다네", Japan Forum (2001)
- 우석훈, "혁명은 이렇게 조용히" (2009), 레디앙
- 우에노치즈꼬, "근대 가족의 성립과 종언" (2009), 이미지문화연구소
- 오히라겐, "새로운배려" (2003), 소화
- 에티안바랄, "오타쿠, 가상세계의 아이들" (2002), 문학과지성
- 자율평론, "비물질 노동과 다중" (2005), 갈무리
- 젤라이저비비아나, "친밀성의 거래" (2009), 에코리브르
- 조은, "젠더 불평등 또는 젠더 패러독스: 신자유주의 통치성과 모성의 정치경제학", 한국여성학, 26(1), pp.69~95 (2010), 한국여성학회
- 조혜정, "근대 적성찰성과 페미니즘" (1998), 또하나의문화
- 조혜정, "교실이돌아왔다" (2008), 또하나의문화
- 지그문트바우만, "쓰레기가 되는 삶들:모더니티와 그 추방자들" (2008), 새물결
- 폴브레낸시, "보이지않는가슴" (2007), 또하나의문화
- 푸코,미셀, "사회를 보호해야한다" (1976), 동문선
- 후타까미노우끼, "일하지 않는 사람들,일할 수 없는 사람들" (2005), 홍익출판사
- 하루끼무라까미, "1Q84" (2009), 문학동네
- 하지메마츠모토, "가난뱅이의 역습" (2009), 이루
- 한스피터마르틴, "세계화의덫" (2003), 영림카디널
- 히라노게이치로, "방울져 떨어지는 세계들의 파문" (2004), 문학동네
- Cho Haejoang, "Children in the Examination War in South Korea, In Children And The Politics of Culture", pp.141~168 (1995), Princeton University Press
- Cho Haejoang, "Male Dominance and Mother Power : The Two Side of Confucian", Asian Women, 2(1), pp.77~104 (1996)
- Cho Haejoang, "Internet, Popular Culture and Culture Industry: Youth and Cultural Formations in Contemporary East Asia", East Asian Cities: New Cultural & Ideological Formations, Joint conference of Lingnan Univerity, pp.6~8 (2003), Chicago University and Shanghai University
- Dore, Ronald, "Reflection on the Diploma Disease Twenty Years Later", Assessment in Education, ~ (1997)
- Fong, Vanessa, "Filial Nationalism Among Chinese Teenagers with Global Identities", American Ethnologist, 31(4) (2004)
- Hakim Bay, "The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism" (1999), Autonomedia
- Hardt, Michael, "Affective labor", Boundary, 2, pp.26~22 (1999)
- Lazzarato, Maurizio, "Immaterial Labor, In Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics" (1996), University of Minnesota Press
- Lessig, Lawrence, "The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World" (2001), Vintage Books
- Lessig, Lawrence, "Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity" (2004), Penguin Books
- Park, So Jin, "Class and Cosmopolitanism: Mothers’ Management of English Education in South Korea", Anthropologist Quarterly, 77(4), pp.645~672 (2004)
- Song, Jesook, "South Koreans in Debt Crisis" (2009), Duke University Press
- Sorensen, Clark, "Success and Education in South Korea", Comparative Education Review (1994)
- Polanyi, Karl, "거대한전환" (2009), 길
- Ueno Chizuko, "The Modern Family in Japan" (2009), Trans Pacific Press