본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Hamlet에 나타난 비극적 더블링

The Tragic Doubling in Hamlet

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This thesis aims to observe how the relationship between Hamlet and Ophelia, the double, leads Hamlet to the way to a tragedy. It also highlights Hamlet's transformation as a symbol of the words, and Ophelia's split from him to become a symbol of emotional song-speech. Hamlet, though his poetic dictions are heightened to the peak of the words, is not able to reach the level of Ophelia's musical song-speech until he is reunited with Ophelia at her grave. Meanwhile, previous studies tend to regard Laertes as the double of Hamlet. Laertes, being objectified as love and jealousy by Hamlet, is a double of Hamlet possessing desire to revenge, with an affection for Ophelia. Hamlet decouples Ophelia from himself to accomplish his ultimate aim, murdering Claudius: but this decoupling also signifies his split from the desire, which is essential to make him act for the revenge. As the result of this split, Hamlet stays at the stage of the linguistic mimesis that estranges him from the real purpose, and this mimesis makes him go blind not to distinguish the representing and the represented. Theoretically, this thesis is indebted to Bradley's traditional character theory, Lacanian psychoanalytic theory, and Weimann's theory of mimesis.

Abstract

This thesis aims to observe how the relationship between Hamlet and Ophelia, the double, leads Hamlet to the way to a tragedy. It also highlights Hamlet's transformation as a symbol of the words, and Ophelia's split from him to become a symbol of emotional song-speech. Hamlet, though his poetic dictions are heightened to the peak of the words, is not able to reach the level of Ophelia's musical song-speech until he is reunited with Ophelia at her grave. Meanwhile, previous studies tend to regard Laertes as the double of Hamlet. Laertes, being objectified as love and jealousy by Hamlet, is a double of Hamlet possessing desire to revenge, with an affection for Ophelia. Hamlet decouples Ophelia from himself to accomplish his ultimate aim, murdering Claudius: but this decoupling also signifies his split from the desire, which is essential to make him act for the revenge. As the result of this split, Hamlet stays at the stage of the linguistic mimesis that estranges him from the real purpose, and this mimesis makes him go blind not to distinguish the representing and the represented. Theoretically, this thesis is indebted to Bradley's traditional character theory, Lacanian psychoanalytic theory, and Weimann's theory of mimesis.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Shakespeare, William, "Hamlet: Prince of Denmark" (2003), Cambridge UP
  2. 김한, "말이 끝나는 곳에 음악이: 말, 음악, 셰익스피어극장, In 그럼에도불구하고: 셰익스피어의 인간과 세상 이야기", pp.229~258 (2009), 도서출판동인
  3. 브루스 핑크, "4. “주체의 전복” 읽기, In 에크리 읽기: 문자 그대로의 라캉", pp.197~232 (2007), 도서출판 b
  4. 지그문트 프로이트, "5. 꿈-재료와 꿈-출처, In 꿈의 해석", pp.209~334 (2010), 주식회사 열린책들
  5. Belsey, Catherine, "The Divided Tragic Hero, In A Companion to Shakespeare's Work 1", pp.73~94 (2003), Blackwell Publishing
  6. Bradley, A. C., "Shakespearean Tragedy" (1992), Macmillan
  7. Connolly, Thomas F, "Shakespeare and the Double Man", Shakespeare Quarterly, 1(1), pp.30~35 (1950)
  8. Danson, Lawrence, "Tragic Alphabet, In William shakespeare's Hamlet: Modern Critical Interpretation", pp.65~86 (1986), Chelsea House Publisher
  9. Drakakis, John, "Introduction, In Shakespearean Tragedy", pp.1~44 (1993), Longman
  10. Edwards, Philip, "ntroduction", Prince of Denmark
  11. Goldman, Michael, "Hamlet and Our Problems, In Shakespeare and the Energies of Drama", pp.74~93 (1972), Princeton UP
  12. Hawkes, Terence, "Telmah, In The Question of Hamlet", pp.310~332 (1970), Oxford UP
  13. Kristeva, Julia, "The Portable Kristeva" (1997), Columbia UP
  14. Hawkes, Terence, "A Sea Shell, In Shakespearean Tragedy", pp.399~419
  15. Hawkes, Terence, "Romeo and Juliet: Love-hatred in the couple, In Shakespearean Tragedy", pp.296~315
  16. Lacan, Jacques, "Desire and the Interpretation of Desire in Hamlet", Yale French Studies, 55(56), pp.11~52 (1977), Literature and Psychoanalysis. The Question of Reading: Otherwise
  17. Lacan, Jacques., "Ecrits: A Selection" (2002), W. W. Norton & Company Ltd
  18. Levin, Kate D, "Two Hamlets", Shakespeare Quarterly, 53(1), pp.106~115 (2002)
  19. Rose, Mark, "Reforming the Role, In William shakespeare's Hamlet: Modern Critical Interpretation", pp.117~128
  20. Showalter, Elaine, "Representing Ophelia: women, madness, and the responsibilities of feminist criticism, In Shakespearean Tragedy", pp.280~295
  21. Trudell, Scott A, "The Meditation of Poesie: Ophelia's Orphic Song", Shakespeare Quarterly, 63(1), pp.46~76 (2012)
  22. Weimann, Robert, "Mimesis in Hamlet, In The Question of Hamlet", pp.275~291

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)