알렉시의 『탈주』: 경계의 사유
Sherman Alexie’s Flight: Thinking of the Boundary
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to analyze Alexie’s Flight in terms of zoe/bios and bare life in Agamben’s Homo Sacer, For Agamben, zoe is a natural life common with an animal, a plant, and an insect, whereas bios refers to a politically valuable life. In ancient Greek, zoe is defined as a man who may be killed and yet not sacrificed, and has a relation of inclusive exclusion with sovereignty. Based on this relationship, politics in Greek is regarded as tanatopolitics which is continuously excluding zoe into a state of exception. In modern times, zoe itself becomes a subject of sovereign power. In this context, Zits in Alexie’s Flight identifies himself with an acne as his identity. And in the end of text, Zits wants to be called Michael. In short, Zits becomes Michael. This process of name revision means that Zits as a subhuman, who defines the American Indians, not only searches for identity through time travel, but implies the general plight of human beings in modern political system. Because human beings as a bare life are thrown into a undistinguishable zone between zoe and bios shown in camps and refugees. Thus, Alexie searches for the boundary between zoe and bios, Indian and Whites through Zits, and beyond it, may recognize the universality of human beings hidden in the structure of modern politics.
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze Alexie’s Flight in terms of zoe/bios and bare life in Agamben’s Homo Sacer, For Agamben, zoe is a natural life common with an animal, a plant, and an insect, whereas bios refers to a politically valuable life. In ancient Greek, zoe is defined as a man who may be killed and yet not sacrificed, and has a relation of inclusive exclusion with sovereignty. Based on this relationship, politics in Greek is regarded as tanatopolitics which is continuously excluding zoe into a state of exception. In modern times, zoe itself becomes a subject of sovereign power. In this context, Zits in Alexie’s Flight identifies himself with an acne as his identity. And in the end of text, Zits wants to be called Michael. In short, Zits becomes Michael. This process of name revision means that Zits as a subhuman, who defines the American Indians, not only searches for identity through time travel, but implies the general plight of human beings in modern political system. Because human beings as a bare life are thrown into a undistinguishable zone between zoe and bios shown in camps and refugees. Thus, Alexie searches for the boundary between zoe and bios, Indian and Whites through Zits, and beyond it, may recognize the universality of human beings hidden in the structure of modern politics.
참고문헌 (11)
- 노헌균, "셔만 알렉시의 『고독한 보안관과 톤토가 천국에서 싸우다』와 <스모크 시그널즈>: 아메리카 인디언 보호구역 리얼리즘과 신세기 인디언주의", 영미문화, 9(1), pp.163~184 (2009), 한국영미문화학회[DOI]
- 노헌균, "셔만 알렉시의 『어느 파트타임 인디언의 진짜 일기』: 현대 미국사회에서 인디언으로 살아남기 위한 전략으로서의 트랜스내셔널리즘", 미국소설, 21(1), pp.5~28 (2014), 미국소설학회
- 조르조 아감벤, "호모 사케르 : 주권 권력과 벌거벗은 생명" (2008), 새물결
- Agamben, Giorgio, "Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life" (1995), Stanford Univ. Press
- Alexie, Sherman, "Flight" (2007), Black Cat
- Berglund, Jeff, "Sherman Alexie: A Collection of Critical Essays" (2010), The Univ. of Utah Press
- Grassian, Daniel, "Understanding Sherman Alexie" (2005), Univ. of South Carolina Press
- Heldrich, Philip, "Sherman Alexie: A Collection of Critical Essays", pp.25~43 (2010)
- Johnson, Jan, "Sherman Alexie: A Collection of Critical Essays", pp.224~240 (2010)
- Nygren, Ase, "Conversations with Sherman Alexie", pp.141~156 (2009), UP. of Mississippi
- Vogel, Mark, "Critical Insights: Sherman Alexie", pp.106~125 (2012), salem Press
