본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

남정현 연작소설 ≪허허선생≫의 그로테스크 변모 양상

The Aspects of the Changes of Grotesque in Nam Junghyun’s Novel Mr. Heoheo

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The grotesques in Mr. Heoheo by Nam Junghyun shows a characteristic of transfiguration over time. Grotesque observed in the early stage describes well the tension in the confrontation between the father, Heoheo and his son. On the other hands, the grotesque situations and scenes in the middle stage are the visualization of distortions and ironies in modern history. In the ending part, the balance between father and son leans toward the father dissolving tension and providing unilateral discourse. Man(Seok) Heo who narrates this story of Mr. Heoheo from the third person’s point of view internalizes fear by evil of his father which is regarded same as social evil. The grotesque with collapsed tension and conflicts leaves only fear. The early grotesque revealed the conflicts between father and son coming from the conflicts between the reality and fantasy, then, the grotesque in the middle stage described our modern history through the unnatural of grotesque, in other words, distortion and contortion. In theending part of the story, with an expansion of absolute evil, fear dominates joy. Absence of offensiveness, general characteristics found in satire, points out lethargy of new force symbolized by Seok Heo and Man Heo, and at the same time, it shows the firmness and steadiness of conservative force, Mr. Heoheo. Nam Junghyun depicted the concerns on foreign countries and conservative group who were firmly and steadily remaining after several events named with symbols of democratization after late 1980s in his novel, Mr. Heoheo.

Abstract

The grotesques in Mr. Heoheo by Nam Junghyun shows a characteristic of transfiguration over time. Grotesque observed in the early stage describes well the tension in the confrontation between the father, Heoheo and his son. On the other hands, the grotesque situations and scenes in the middle stage are the visualization of distortions and ironies in modern history. In the ending part, the balance between father and son leans toward the father dissolving tension and providing unilateral discourse. Man(Seok) Heo who narrates this story of Mr. Heoheo from the third person’s point of view internalizes fear by evil of his father which is regarded same as social evil. The grotesque with collapsed tension and conflicts leaves only fear. The early grotesque revealed the conflicts between father and son coming from the conflicts between the reality and fantasy, then, the grotesque in the middle stage described our modern history through the unnatural of grotesque, in other words, distortion and contortion. In theending part of the story, with an expansion of absolute evil, fear dominates joy. Absence of offensiveness, general characteristics found in satire, points out lethargy of new force symbolized by Seok Heo and Man Heo, and at the same time, it shows the firmness and steadiness of conservative force, Mr. Heoheo. Nam Junghyun depicted the concerns on foreign countries and conservative group who were firmly and steadily remaining after several events named with symbols of democratization after late 1980s in his novel, Mr. Heoheo.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 남정현, "<허허선생1-괴물체>, <허허선생2-발길질>, <허허선생3-귀향길>, <허허선생4-옛날이야기>, <허허선생5-준이와의 3개월>, <허허선생6-핵반응>,<허허선생7-신사고>, <허허선생8-허허선생 옷 벗을라>, In 남정현문학전집2" (2002), 국학자료원
  2. 김욱동, "대화적 상상력", pp.234~268 (1988), 문학과지성사
  3. 정명환, "아름다운 시간의 나무", pp.119~200 (2000), 한울
  4. 볼프강 카이저, "미술과 문학에 나타난 그로테스크", pp.303~304 (2011), 아모르문디
  5. 캐서린 스푸너, "다크컬처", pp.95~97 (2008), 사문난적
  6. 캐스린 흄, "환상과 미메시스", 푸른나무, pp.55~57 (2000)
  7. Thomson, Philip, "그로테스크", pp.3~85 (1986), 서울대출판부
  8. 강가형, "남정현 소설 연구 : 『허허선생』을 중심으로 한 그로테스크 기법 연구", 석사, pp.2010
  9. 강진구, "왜곡된 식민의 경험, 그 기억과 망각의 사이, In 남정현문학전집 3", pp.262~275 (2002), 국학자료원
  10. 구중서, "현실을 초극하는 집요한 풍자정신, In 남정현문학전집 3", pp.40~41
  11. 김상주, "남정현 소설의 기법 고찰, In 남정현문학전집 3", pp.132~155
  12. 김양선, "허허(虛虛)한 세상을 향한 날 선 풍자, In 남정현문학전집 3", pp.202~217
  13. 김형중, "남정현 소설의 정신분석학적 연구 시론 - 풍자와 정신병리", 한국문학이론과 비평, 9(1), pp.247~268 (2005), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  14. 이봉범, "남정현 문학의 알레고리와 풍자", 泮橋語文硏究, 8, pp.307~ (1997)
  15. 이상갑, "비인간의 형상, 그 역설의 의미, In 남정현문학전집 3", pp.218~241
  16. 장영우, "통곡의 현실, 고소의 미학, In 남정현문학전집 3", pp.85~89
  17. 장현, "1960년대 한국 소설의 탈식민적 양상 연구 : 이호철·최인훈·남정현의 소설을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2005
  18. 홍성식, "남정현의 ??허허선생?? 연구", 한중인문학연구, (20), pp.297~320 (2007), 한중인문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)