1930년대 초 천도교신파의 정세인식과 조직강화
Social Awareness and the Strengthening of Organization by the New faction of Chundogyo in the Early 1930s
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The new and old faction of Chundogyo underwent another divergence in April 1932,slightly over a year after their merging in December 1930. After the split, while the oldfaction of Chundogyo devoted itself to religious activities conforming to the body ofChundogyo traditions, the new faction openly denounced Shingan-hoe and sought togain the upper hand in the social movement of the time. With this in mind, it expandedsectoral movements and started to actively engage in a peasant movement, labormovement and youth movement. The new faction of Chundogyo believed that themission of peasant and labor movements was to organize and train peasants andworkers. Rather than being confined to a mere class movement, the social movementwas therefore raised to an inclusive level where it aimed to embrace preoccupations and demands from different strata of society. At the same time, leaders of the new faction valued the role of a single vanguard party, namely the Chundogyo Youth Party, in leading the various sectoral movements and acting as a ‘national control tower’. For this purpose, the new faction of Chundogyo sought to organize sectoral groups under the Chundogyo Youth Party with a view to keeping them under control. As evidence of this policy, the Chosun Agrarian Organization was kept directly under the Party, the Chosun Labor Organization was founded, and the Chundogyo Youth Group was renewed. In response to the socialists’ attacks, leaders of the new faction also advocated the ‘Chosun movement leadership’, based on social activities such as the Youth Party’s sectoral movements, as well as a strong centralized organizational structure.
Abstract
The new and old faction of Chundogyo underwent another divergence in April 1932,slightly over a year after their merging in December 1930. After the split, while the oldfaction of Chundogyo devoted itself to religious activities conforming to the body ofChundogyo traditions, the new faction openly denounced Shingan-hoe and sought togain the upper hand in the social movement of the time. With this in mind, it expandedsectoral movements and started to actively engage in a peasant movement, labormovement and youth movement. The new faction of Chundogyo believed that themission of peasant and labor movements was to organize and train peasants andworkers. Rather than being confined to a mere class movement, the social movementwas therefore raised to an inclusive level where it aimed to embrace preoccupations and demands from different strata of society. At the same time, leaders of the new faction valued the role of a single vanguard party, namely the Chundogyo Youth Party, in leading the various sectoral movements and acting as a ‘national control tower’. For this purpose, the new faction of Chundogyo sought to organize sectoral groups under the Chundogyo Youth Party with a view to keeping them under control. As evidence of this policy, the Chosun Agrarian Organization was kept directly under the Party, the Chosun Labor Organization was founded, and the Chundogyo Youth Group was renewed. In response to the socialists’ attacks, leaders of the new faction also advocated the ‘Chosun movement leadership’, based on social activities such as the Youth Party’s sectoral movements, as well as a strong centralized organizational structure.
참고문헌 (28)
- "동아일보", ~
- "조선일보", ~
- "농민", ~
- "당성", ~
- "신인간", ~
- "조선농민", ~
- "천도교회월보", ~
- "혜성", ~
- "동방평론", ~
- "비판", ~
- "삼천리", ~
- "천도교청년당소사", ~
- "여암문집", ~
- 김정인, "천도교 근대 민족운동 연구" (2009), 한울 아카데미
- 김동명, "지배와 저항, 그리고 협력" (2002), 경인문화사
- 김호일, "한국근현대이행기 사회연구" (2001), 신서원
- 방기중, "한국근현대사상사연구" (1992), 역사비평사
- 이균영, "신간회연구" (1993), 역사비평사
- 조규태, "천도교의 민족운동 연구" (2006), 선인
- 천도교청년회중앙본부, "천도교청년회80년사", ~ (2000)
- 김권정, "1920년대 후반 기독교세력의 반기독교운동 대응과 민족운동의 전개", 한국기독교와 역사, 14 (2001)
- 노영택, "수촌박영석교수화갑기념 한국사학논총 (하)" (1992), 탐구당
- 이준식, "일제침략기 기독교지식인의 대외인식과 반기독교운동", 역사와 현실, 10 (1993)
- 이태훈, "일제하 친일정치운동 연구 : 자치·참정권 청원운동을 중심으로", 박사, 사학, pp.2010
- 정용서, "일제하 천도교청년당의 운동노선과 정치사상", 한국사연구, 105 (1999)
- 정혜정, "일제하 천도교 ‘수운이즘’과 사회주의의 사상논쟁", 동학연구, 11 (2002)
- 지수걸, "조선농민사의 단체성격에 관한 연구 -천도교청년당과의 관계를 중심으로-", 역사학보, 106 (1985)
- 허수, "개념과 소통" (2009), 한림과학원
