본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

17⋅18세기 류큐(琉球) 사서(史書) 소재왕통(王統) 시조 신화와 왕권의 논리

Myths for Kingship of the Ryukyu Kingdom in the 17th and 18th Centuries

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

Myths for Kingship of the Ryukyu Kingdomin the 17th and 18th CenturiesJeong, JinheeIn the 17th and 18th centuries, when the Ryukyu kingdom had been invadedand controlled by Japan, some official texts about ‘history’ were documented. In that texts, there are some myths about the kings-Syunten(舜天), Eiso(英祖),Satto(察度), Syouhasi(尙巴志), Syouen(尙圓)-who founded dynasties of Ryukyukingdom. This study attempts to delineate the features and meaning of those foundermyths as a polotial discourse for kingship. The results of this study are asfollows. 1. The founder myths are discourses to describe the genealogy of the Ryukyukingdom as the result of Mandate of Heaven(T’ien Ming, 天命). 2. In ancient okinawa, the sun was a symbol of ruler. The king of Ryukyukingdom was thought as ‘son of the sun’, ‘Tedako(てだこ, 太陽子) in thetime of Syou dynasty(尙王朝). But in the founder myths, the only oneTedako is Eiso. 3. In the myths, the ‘historical’ founders are described as the king foragriculture. They were said to make the farming instruments with iron andrule the spring water for farming. The iron and water for fariming wasthought to represent the power of king and the kingship. 4. The writers of myths aimed to be separated from the mythical kingshipof past Ryukyu(古琉球). So, they threw the idea of Tedako(=mythicalkingship) into the prison of mythical ages by rewriting myth of King Eiso. Instead of it, they built up the new image of agriculture-king who rulesand controlls the iron and water for good farming. The meaing of thischange, from ‘shiny sun’ to ‘cultural king’, is that the abstract and generalpower of kingship was turned into a concrete and restricted power ofkingship. On the bases of it, there was the confucian political ideas from154 비교문화연구 제35집 (2014. 6.)China, T’ien Ming thought(天命論). Under the influence of not only China but also Japan, the writers of mythsattempt to find a new way for their kingdom by reconstructing kingship withruminating over the kingship of past. The myth of founders in the 17th and 18thCenturies shows the aspects of kingship of Ryukyu kingdom and tells us thatthose myths are the political discourses identifying kingship and Ryukyukingdom.

Abstract

Myths for Kingship of the Ryukyu Kingdomin the 17th and 18th CenturiesJeong, JinheeIn the 17th and 18th centuries, when the Ryukyu kingdom had been invadedand controlled by Japan, some official texts about ‘history’ were documented. In that texts, there are some myths about the kings-Syunten(舜天), Eiso(英祖),Satto(察度), Syouhasi(尙巴志), Syouen(尙圓)-who founded dynasties of Ryukyukingdom. This study attempts to delineate the features and meaning of those foundermyths as a polotial discourse for kingship. The results of this study are asfollows. 1. The founder myths are discourses to describe the genealogy of the Ryukyukingdom as the result of Mandate of Heaven(T’ien Ming, 天命). 2. In ancient okinawa, the sun was a symbol of ruler. The king of Ryukyukingdom was thought as ‘son of the sun’, ‘Tedako(てだこ, 太陽子) in thetime of Syou dynasty(尙王朝). But in the founder myths, the only oneTedako is Eiso. 3. In the myths, the ‘historical’ founders are described as the king foragriculture. They were said to make the farming instruments with iron andrule the spring water for farming. The iron and water for fariming wasthought to represent the power of king and the kingship. 4. The writers of myths aimed to be separated from the mythical kingshipof past Ryukyu(古琉球). So, they threw the idea of Tedako(=mythicalkingship) into the prison of mythical ages by rewriting myth of King Eiso. Instead of it, they built up the new image of agriculture-king who rulesand controlls the iron and water for good farming. The meaing of thischange, from ‘shiny sun’ to ‘cultural king’, is that the abstract and generalpower of kingship was turned into a concrete and restricted power ofkingship. On the bases of it, there was the confucian political ideas from154 비교문화연구 제35집 (2014. 6.)China, T’ien Ming thought(天命論). Under the influence of not only China but also Japan, the writers of mythsattempt to find a new way for their kingdom by reconstructing kingship withruminating over the kingship of past. The myth of founders in the 17th and 18thCenturies shows the aspects of kingship of Ryukyu kingdom and tells us thatthose myths are the political discourses identifying kingship and Ryukyukingdom.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 塚田清, "琉球國碑文記" (1970), 財團法人學術書出版會
  2. "球陽" (1978), 角川書店
  3. "中山世鑑" (1972), 東京美術
  4. "中山世譜" (1972), 東京美術
  5. "中山世譜" (1973), 沖繩縣敎育委員會
  6. "遺老說傳" (1978), 角川書店
  7. 이정숙, "동아시아 역사 속에서의 정치와 신화", 기호학 연구, 1(15), pp.101~145 (2004), 한국기호학회
  8. 정재서, "禪讓인가? 簒奪인가? - 고대 중국의 왕권신화에 대한 해체론적 접근 -", 중국어문학, (54), pp.1~20 (2009), 영남중국어문학회
  9. 정진희, "양속기(兩屬期) 류큐(琉球) 개벽신화의 재편과 그 의미", 아시아문화연구, 16, pp.244~270 (2009), 아시아문화연구소
  10. 정진희, "오키나와 옛이야기" (2013), 보고사
  11. 허남춘, "琉球 오모로사우시의 고대·중세 서사시적 특성-한국의 중심부와 주변부 제주 신화와의 대비를 적용하며", 비교민속학, (47), pp.359~386 (2012), 비교민속학회[DOI]
  12. 高良倉吉, "琉球王國の構造" (1987), 吉川弘文館
  13. 宮城榮昌, "琉球使者の江戸上り" (1982), 第一書房
  14. 大林太良, "東アジアの王權神話" (1984), 弘文堂
  15. 渡名喜明, "古琉球王權のメッセ〡ジ", 新沖繩文學, 85 (1990)
  16. 渡名喜明, "琉球王權の特質を探る", 新沖繩文學, 85 (1990)
  17. 末次智, "琉球文學, 沖繩の文學" (1996), 巖波書店
  18. 末次智, "琉球の王權と神話-'おもろさうし'の研究" (1995), 第一書房
  19. 比嘉實, "琉球王統譜⋅信號の思想史的硏究-禪讓論受容の思想的背景", 沖繩文化硏究, 16 (1990), 法政大學沖繩文化硏究所
  20. 小島瓔禮, "日本の神々-神社と聖地" (2000), 白水社
  21. 小島毅, "天皇と王權-宗敎と權威" (2002), 巖波書店
  22. 小峯和明, "尙巴志の物語-三山統一神話の再檢証", 國文學解釋と鑑賞, 71(10) (2006), 至文堂
  23. 外間守善, "古典を読む おもろさうし" (1998), 巖波書店
  24. 前城直子, "'中山世鑑'所傳琉球開闢神話の史料批判的硏究", 沖繩文化, 42 (1974), 沖繩文化協會
  25. 池宮正治, "琉球文學論の方法" (1982), 三一書房
  26. 池宮正治, "琉球史書に見る說話的表現", 說話文學硏究, 32 (1997), 說話文學會
  27. 池宮正治, "琉球の歷史敍述", 文學, 9(3) (1998), 巖波書店
  28. 知名定寬, "沖繩の宗敎と民俗" (1988), 第一書房
  29. 知名定寬, "琉球佛敎史の硏究" (2008), 榕樹書林
  30. 沖繩縣文化振興會公文書管理部 史料編集室, "槪說 沖繩の歷史と文化" (2000), 沖繩縣敎育委員會
  31. 波照間永吉, "琉球の歷史と文化-'おもろさうし'の世界" (2007), 角川學藝出版
  32. 後田多敦, "琉球の國家祭祀制度" (2009), Mugen

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)