Written Corrective Feedback on College English Writing
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
This paper studies the effects of written corrective feedback on non‐ English majors’ English writing at college in China. The experiment lasted 8 weeks and involved 45 students, divided into three groups: the direct feedback, the indirect feedback and the control group according to their pretest scores and the types of feedback they received. Each group was composed of 15 subjects. Based on an analysis of the experimental and control group data, the current study showed that the students who received form‐focused written corrective feedback over 8 weeks reduced linguistic errors greatly in their subsequent writings and the students who got indirect feedback did better than those who had direct feedback. In addition, it was found that content‐focused written corrective feedback can significantly enhance the content of students’ writing whether the feedback was given in a detailed way or general way.
Abstract
This paper studies the effects of written corrective feedback on non‐ English majors’ English writing at college in China. The experiment lasted 8 weeks and involved 45 students, divided into three groups: the direct feedback, the indirect feedback and the control group according to their pretest scores and the types of feedback they received. Each group was composed of 15 subjects. Based on an analysis of the experimental and control group data, the current study showed that the students who received form‐focused written corrective feedback over 8 weeks reduced linguistic errors greatly in their subsequent writings and the students who got indirect feedback did better than those who had direct feedback. In addition, it was found that content‐focused written corrective feedback can significantly enhance the content of students’ writing whether the feedback was given in a detailed way or general way.
참고문헌 (30)
- ?, "Journal of Second Language Writing", 2000, 227~257
- "Journal of Second Language Writing", 2003, 267~296
- "Foreign Language Teaching and Research", 2008, 279~286
- Fathman, A., , pp.178~190 (1990), Cambridge University Press
- ?, "CATESOL Journal", 1995, 41~62
- "Journal of Second Language Writing", 1999, 1~11
- Ferris, D. R., "Responding to writing in : Exploring second language writing", pp.119~140 (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Ferris, D. R., "Perspectives, problems, and practices in treating written error", In Colloquium presented at International TESOL Convention, pp.14~18 (2000)
- ?, "Journal of Second Language Writing", 2001, 161~184
- "Modern Language Journal", 1995, 329~344
- Frantzen, D., "Learner self‐correction of written compositions: What does it show us? in : Foreign language learning: a research perspective", pp.92~107 (1987), Newbury House
- "Journal of Second Language Writing", 2007, 40~53
- "Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages", 2006, 59~63
- "Journal of Second Language Writing", 1994, 141~163
- "Journal of Second Language Writing", 2001, 185~212
- "Modern Language Journal", 1991, 305~313
- "Modern Language Journal", 1982, 140~149
- "System", 1997, 465~477
- "Studies in Second Language acquisition", 1997, 37~66
- ?, "Reading and Writing", 2009, 219~243
- "TESOL Quarterly", 1986, 83~95
- "Applied linguistics", 1990, 206~226
- "Modern language Journal", 2001, 244~258
- "Foreign Language Annals", 1984, 195~202
- ?, "RELC Journal", 1992, 103~110
- "Language Learning", 1996, 327~369
- "Journal of Second Language Writing", 1999, 111~122
- "Concentric: Studies in English Literature Linguistics", 2001, 225~240
- "Journal of Second Language Writing", 2007, ~
- "Foreign Language World", 1996, 41~45
