한국영화의 초국가적 수용: 영화리뷰를 중심으로
Transnational Reception of Korean Film: Analyses of Film Reviews
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is based on the view that film should be conceived as a form of cultural practice whose meaning is always in the process of being produced within diverse socio-cultural contexts and aims to examine the ways in which the meaning of Korean film is (re)mediated or received in diverse cultural contexts outside the country. In this paper, we employ two theoretical grounds. Firstly, it positions itself in line with the audience studies within the field of cultural studies where the audience is conceived as active agents who produce the meaning of a popular culture text. The recruitment of the theoretical propositions from the audience studies enables recognition of the significance of the reception in film practice which recently seems to be oriented on production and distribution. Secondly, we conceive transnationality of film as that which is being produced in the process of transaction between the film and the audience, that is to say, transnationality is a form of discourse that emerges upon cultural interaction. The empirical work involves examination of a set of reviews of four films--Chihwaseon, Oldboy, Thirt, Poety--that have been published in daily newspapers and some popular film magazines in the U. S., the U. K. and France. Through the analysis of the film reviews, we identify four interpretive schemes or rather discourses recruited via which the Korean films are approached and understood: auteurism, formalism, universal themes, emotional response. We propose that these four kinds of discourse provide a common ground for the audience from different cultural backgrounds to understand Korean film. Furthermore, we also suggest that transnationality of Korean cinema needs to be reconsidered in terms of the reception as the audience from different socio-cultural backgrounds should be understood as active agents who are capable of engaging in Korean cultural texts such as film in their own way producing various meanings and these are also constituent of the meaning of the cultural texts.
Abstract
This paper is based on the view that film should be conceived as a form of cultural practice whose meaning is always in the process of being produced within diverse socio-cultural contexts and aims to examine the ways in which the meaning of Korean film is (re)mediated or received in diverse cultural contexts outside the country. In this paper, we employ two theoretical grounds. Firstly, it positions itself in line with the audience studies within the field of cultural studies where the audience is conceived as active agents who produce the meaning of a popular culture text. The recruitment of the theoretical propositions from the audience studies enables recognition of the significance of the reception in film practice which recently seems to be oriented on production and distribution. Secondly, we conceive transnationality of film as that which is being produced in the process of transaction between the film and the audience, that is to say, transnationality is a form of discourse that emerges upon cultural interaction. The empirical work involves examination of a set of reviews of four films--Chihwaseon, Oldboy, Thirt, Poety--that have been published in daily newspapers and some popular film magazines in the U. S., the U. K. and France. Through the analysis of the film reviews, we identify four interpretive schemes or rather discourses recruited via which the Korean films are approached and understood: auteurism, formalism, universal themes, emotional response. We propose that these four kinds of discourse provide a common ground for the audience from different cultural backgrounds to understand Korean film. Furthermore, we also suggest that transnationality of Korean cinema needs to be reconsidered in terms of the reception as the audience from different socio-cultural backgrounds should be understood as active agents who are capable of engaging in Korean cultural texts such as film in their own way producing various meanings and these are also constituent of the meaning of the cultural texts.
참고문헌 (55)
- ""Poetry: A Perfectly Performed Ode to a Senescent Woman"" (2011)[URL]
- Ang, Ian, "Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination" (1982), Methuen
- Appadurai, Arjun, "Modernity at Large" (1996), University of Minnesota Press
- ""Old Boy", Critique du film, Abus de ciné"[URL]
- Z, "S", pp.1974, Barthes, Roland
- Z, "S", pp.1970, Barthes, Roland
- ""Oldboy", Film Review, Reelviews"[URL]
- ""Ivre de femmes et de peinture", Critique du film, Il était une fois le cinéma"[URL]
- Bordwell, David, "Making Meaning, Cambridge" (1989), Harvard Univeristy Press
- ""Oldboy", Film Review, The Guardian" (2004)[URL]
- ""Chihwaseon", Film Review, The Guardian" (2003)[URL]
- ""Poetry", Film Review, Variety, May 19, 2010" (2010)[URL]
- ""Poetry", Critique, Critikat, 24 août, 2010"[URL]
- ""Cannes Kiss Off", Time Magazine, June 3, 2002" (2002)[URL]
- ""History of the Cannes Film Festival", 2006" (2006)[URL]
- Desser, David, "“Global Noir: Genre Film in the Age of Transnationalism”, In Film Genre Reader III", pp.516~536 (2003), University of Texas Press
- Dissanayake, Wimal, "Melodrama and Asian Cinema" (1993), Cambridge University Press
- ""Thirst, ceci est mon sang", Critique du film, Télérama, 30 septembre, 2009" (2009)[URL]
- ""Design for Living: An unconventional sort of menage a trois in Oldboy", Film Review, Chicago Sun-Times, March 25, 2005" (2005)[URL]
- ""Poetry", Film Review, Chicago Sun-Times, Feb 24 2011" (2011)[URL]
- ""Thirst", Film Review. Chicago Sun-Times, August 13, 2009" (2009)[URL]
- ""Thirst", Film Review, Variety, May 14, 2009"[URL]
- Elsaesser, Thomas, ""Film Festival Networks: The New Topographies of Cinema in Europe", in European Cinema: Face to Face with Hollywood", pp.82~107 (2005), Amsterdam University Press
- Fisk, John, "Television Culture" (1987), Routledge
- Gemser, Gerda, "The Impact of Film Reviews on the Box Office Performance of Art House Versus Mainstream Motion Pictures", Journal of Cultural Economics, 31(1), pp.43~63 (2007)
- Goldman, William, "Adventures in the Screen Trade" (1983), Warner Books
- Grant, Catherine, "Auteur Machines? Auteurism and the Dvd, In Film and Television after", pp.101~115 (2008), Routledge
- decoding, In Culture, Media, Language, "Encoding", pp.1981, Hall, Stuart
- Higbee, Will, "Concepts of transnational cinema: towards a critical transnationalism in film studies", Transnational Cinemas, 1(1), pp.7~21 (2010)
- Higson, Andrew, "The Concept of National Cinema, In Film and Nationalism", pp.52~67 (2002), Rutgers University Press
- Hobson, Dorothy, "Crossroads : The Drama of a Soap Opera" (1982), Methuen
- Jancovich, Mark, "Genre and the Audience: Genre Classifications and Cultural Distinctions in the Mediation of The Silence of the Lambs, In Hollywood Spectatorship: Changing Perceptions of Cinema Audiences", pp.33~45 (2001), British Film Institute
- "“Poetry”, Film Review, Sight & Sound, August 2011" (2011)[URL]
- 김소영, "Postcolonial film historiography in Taiwan and South Korea: The Puppetmaster and Chihwaseon", INTER-ASIA CULTURAL STUDIES, 9(2), pp.195~210 (2008), ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS
- Klein, Christina, "Why American Studies Needs to Think about Korean Cinema, or, Transnational Genres in the Films of Bong Joon-ho", American Quarterly, 60(4), pp.871~898 (2008)
- Liebes, Tamar, "The Export of Meaning: Cross-Cultural Readings of Dallas" (1993), Polity Press
- "Seoul Harvest" (2002)[URL]
- Marchetti, Gina, "Hong Kong Film, Hollywood, and the New Global Cinema" (2007), Routledge
- Mazdon, Lucy, "Transnational 'French' Cinema: The Cannes Film Festival", Modern & Contemporary France, 15(1), pp.9~20 (2007)
- Morley, David, "The 'Nationwide' Audience: Structure and Decoding" (1980), BFI
- Morris, Meaghan, "Hong Kong connections" (2005), Hong Kong University Press
- "Thirst ceci est mon sang"[URL]
- ""Poetry: la dignité de la vieille dame, enver et contre tous", Le monde, août 24, 2010" (2010)[URL]
- ""Thirst, ceci est mon sang: vampire et clergyman", Le monde, 29 septembre, 2009" (2009)[URL]
- Ryoo, Woongjae, "The Political Economy of the Global Mediascape: The Case of the South Korean Film Industry", Media, Culture and Society, 30(6), pp.873~889 (2008)
- Sarris, Andrew, "Notes on the Auteur Theory of 1962, In Film Theory and Criticism, Fifth Edition", pp.515~518 (1999), Oxford University Press
- Segers, Frank, "Korea Moves", pp.14~16 (2000), Hollywood Reporter
- Schneider, Tassilo, "Finding a New Heimat in the Wild West: Karl May and the German Western of the 1960s, In Back in the Saddle Again: New Essays on the Western", pp.141~159 (1998), BFI
- "In and Out of Trouble in 19th-Century Korea: Chihwaseon" (2003)[URL]
- Shin, Jeeyoung, "Globalisation and New Korean Cinema", pp.51~62 (2005), Edinburgh University Press
- "Chihwaseon: Strokes of Fire" (2002)[URL]
- Stringer, Julian, "Global Cities and International Film Festival Economy, In Cinema and the City: Film and Urban Societies in a Global Context", pp.134~144 (2001), Blackwell
- Stringer, Julian, "Putting Korean Cinema in its Place: Genre Classification and the Contexts of Reception, In New York University Press", pp.92~105 (2005), New York University Press
- ""Oldboy's Powerful Hold", Film Review, The Washington Post, April 8, 2005" (2005)[URL]
- Wilinsky, Barbara., "Sure Seaters: The Emergence of Art House Cinema" (2001), University of Minnesota Press