의료과오의 형사적 책임 - 의사의 주의의무를 中心으로 -
A Study on the Criminal Responsibility in the Medical Malpractice -centering around a attention duty in a doctor-
3
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Medical care is considered as one of the most important in the field in the natural science. In modern society, medical science achieved great advance due to the astonishing development of natural science. On the other hand, we face more danger in medical care, because doctors should adopt more technical surgery medicine with side effect and complicated instrument. When medical accident arise, doctor can be charged civil responsibility or criminal responsibility. Medical care is justified in criminal law as professional activity. Medical malpractice is defied as the neglect of duty in the process of medical care. Ahead, deals with criminal negligence in general negligence in criminal law is failure to take care or precautions to prevent the crime. It studies the theorical development in negligence. And the essence of negligence is in the carelessness not in the ignorance of the fact. And we analyze care at large to foresee the crime and to prevent it. We found the basis of care in the law and regulation itself and practice. The next, deals with medical malpractice, it studies the speciality of medical care; risk, collaboration, discretion and technical skill. Negligence, in particular is defined as the omission to do something which a resonable man guided by those ordinary considerations which ordinarily regulate human affairs, would do, or the doing of something that a reasonable and prudent man would not do. The reasonable man becomes the duly careful member of the profession
Abstract
Medical care is considered as one of the most important in the field in the natural science. In modern society, medical science achieved great advance due to the astonishing development of natural science. On the other hand, we face more danger in medical care, because doctors should adopt more technical surgery medicine with side effect and complicated instrument. When medical accident arise, doctor can be charged civil responsibility or criminal responsibility. Medical care is justified in criminal law as professional activity. Medical malpractice is defied as the neglect of duty in the process of medical care. Ahead, deals with criminal negligence in general negligence in criminal law is failure to take care or precautions to prevent the crime. It studies the theorical development in negligence. And the essence of negligence is in the carelessness not in the ignorance of the fact. And we analyze care at large to foresee the crime and to prevent it. We found the basis of care in the law and regulation itself and practice. The next, deals with medical malpractice, it studies the speciality of medical care; risk, collaboration, discretion and technical skill. Negligence, in particular is defined as the omission to do something which a resonable man guided by those ordinary considerations which ordinarily regulate human affairs, would do, or the doing of something that a reasonable and prudent man would not do. The reasonable man becomes the duly careful member of the profession
참고문헌 (36)
- 김선중, "의료과오소송법" (2005), 박영사
- 김일수, "형법총론" (2006), 박영사
- 문국진, "의료의 법이론" (1983), 고대출판부
- 박상기, "형법총론" (2004), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법총론" (2006), 홍문사
- 손동권, "형법총론" (2005), 율곡문화사
- 신동운, "형법총론" (2006), 법문사
- 신현호, "의료소송총론" (2000), 육법사
- 오영근, "형법총론" (2005), 박영사
- 이상돈, "의료형법" (1998), 법문사
- 이재상, "형법총론" (2006), 박영사
- 이종태, "의료과실의 이론과 실제" (2001), 청암미디어
- 임? 웅, "형법총론" (2006), 법문사
- 최재천, "의료형법" (2003), 육법사
- 김선석, "의료과오에 있어서 인과관계와 과실 in 재판자료" (1985), 법원행정처
- 김신규, "형법상 의료과실의 법리에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1991
- 김충원, "형사상 의료과실의 인정기준", 판례연구, 14 (2001), 서울지방변호사회
- 문국진, "의료평가에 있어서 의료수준 문제", 법률신문 (1996)
- 문채규, "형법상 과실의 구조", 비교형사법연구, 5(1) (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 법무연수원, "의료현장에서 자주 발생하는 형사법적 문제" (2006)
- 석희태, "의료과오의 민사책임에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1988
- 이준상, "의료과오에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1983
- 정현미, "의료과오의 형사법적 책임" (1998), 한국형사정책연구원
- 추호경, "의료과오에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1991
- 추호경, "의료과오에 관한 이론과 판례의 동향 in 의료과오사범의 실태와 대책" (1990), 법무연수원
- 大谷? 實, "醫療行爲と法" (1980), 弘文堂
- 新美育文, "醫療關係の法的性格; 醫療過誤法入門" (1979), 靑林書院
- 野田? 寬, "醫療上の注意義務序說" (1971), 有?閣
- 松倉豊治, "醫療過誤の諸問題 in 醫學と法律の間" (1980), 判例タイムス社
- 植木? 哲, "醫療の法律學" (2004), 한국법제연구원
- John L.Diamond, "Understanding Torts" (2000), LexisNexis.
- Bryan A. Garner, "Black's Law Dictionary, 6th ed" (1990), West젨?Group
- Schroth(hrsg.), Medizinstrafrecht, "Einwilligung und Aufkl?ung, in:젨젨젨젨젨젨젨?Roxin", pp.2000, Knauer, 훣ztliche Heileingriff
- Kienapel, "Das erlaubte Risiko im Strafrecht" (1996)
- Wessels, Strafrecht, "BTI" (1993), Aufl.,
- Uhlenbruck, "Rechtsprechung zu typischen Fallgruppen ?ztlicher Haftung, in:젨젨젨젨?Laufs", pp.1992, Kern