본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

양성평등을 위한 적극적 평등실현조치의 헌법적 근거마련의 필요성

Necessity to prepare of the Constitutional Basis of Affirmative Action for Gender Equality

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Abstract

The Constitution in every nation has Equal Right Clause and it is considered as one of the most important and fundamental rights. In Article 11 of our Constitutional Law, equality before the law is mentioned. And in Section 4 of Article 32, special protection of female labor and in Section 3 of Article 34, female Welfare and elevation of interests is indicated. But throughout history, the social and structural discrimination is endured to women. though the contemporary democratic constitution includes legal protection of equal rights, traditional value-neutral interpretation of equal rights such as Gender-blindness was not sufficient to embody substantial equality. To solve the problem of the discrimination like this, the gap between legal or mechanical ideology of equality and substantial equality appears to be reduced by ‘gender affirmative action’ in present discriminatory situations. The effectiveness of gender affirmative action in eliminating discrimination and achieving substantial equality for women is obvious, but it is double-edged sword with the potential to violate the rights of men since it is a form of inequal treatment privileging the disadvantaged on the one hand, while causing reverse discrimination on the other hand. Affirmative action is an object of dispute in association with reverse discrimination and merit system. To solve this problem in the interest of social unification, This study discussed the constitutionality and constitutional limits of gender affirmative action programs in Korea. Finally to settle the problem of the reverse discrimination and unconstitutionality of affirmative action, the preparation of constitutional basis of affirmative action is required.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 김선욱, "적극적 조치의 현실과 법리", 서울대학교 BK21 사업단 발표자료, ~ (2003)
  2. 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2009), 법문사
  3. 김영환, "적극적 평등실현조치(Affirmative Action)에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1991
  4. 김영희, "할당제의 합헌성에 대한 연구", 한국여성개발, ~ (1997)
  5. 김엘림, "외국의 고용평등제도 비교분석", 노동부, ~ (1999)
  6. 김엘림, "여성노동권의 보장과 현실", 한국헌법학회 주최 한국헌법 50주년 기념심포지움 발표자료 (1998)
  7. 김재광, "평등권의 원리적 고찰", 경희대고황논집, 18 (1996), 경희대학교 대학원
  8. 김철수, "헌법학개론" (2009), 박영사
  9. 김향아, "선진국의 적극적 평등실현조치 사례연구(캐나다의 적극적 고용개선조치)", 한국노동연구원, ~ (2005)
  10. 노동부 여성고용팀, "남녀고용평등법 시행지침", 노동부, ~ (2006)
  11. 명재진, "고용에 있어서 여성을 위한 적극적 평등실현조치", 공법학연구, 7(3), pp.277~310 (2006), 한국비교공법학회
  12. 성낙인, "헌법상 평등의 법리와 판례", 감사, (66) (2000), 감사원
  13. 성낙인, "헌법학" (2009), 법문사
  14. 윤명선, "헌법체계론" (1996), 법률계
  15. 이지현, "여성주의 관점에서 본 헌법상의 양성평등", 중앙법학, 8(1), pp.67~102 (2006), 중앙법학회
  16. 임지봉, "적극적 평등실현조치와 실질적 평등", 법조, 52(8)통권 : 563호 (2003)
  17. 최무현, "한국의 Affirmative Action정책연구-장애인고용정책을 중심으로-" (2005), 한국학술정보(주)
  18. 최신융, "양성 고용평등 실현을 위한 적극적 조치의 민간부분 적용전략에 관한 연구", 국회여성위원회, ~ (2003)
  19. Anderson, H. Terry, "The Pursuit of Fairness : A History of Affirmative Action" (2004), Oxford University Press
  20. Daniel Sabbagh, "Equality and Transparency : A Strategic Perspective on Affirmative Action in American Law" (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
  21. Faye J.Crosby, "Affirmative Action Is Dead ; Long Live Affirmative Action" (2004), Yale University Press
  22. J. Edward Kellough, "Understanding Affirmative Action : Politics, Discrimination, And the Search for Justice" (2006), Georgetown University Press
  23. Joel Wm Friedman, "Employment Discrimination Stories" (2006), Foundation Press
  24. Karr Editorial, "Affirmative Action" (2007), Greenhaven Press
  25. Konrad Hesse, "서독헌법원론" (1987), 삼영사
  26. Döris König, "Die Grundgesetzänderung in Art.3, Abs.2, 2 GG.,DöV 1995, Heft 20", ~
  27. H. Dreier, "Grundgesetz Kommentar", Rn, 102~ (2004)
  28. John Rawls, "A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition" (1999), Harvard University Press
  29. Kirlin R.Anglin, "The Affirmative Action Dilemma" (2005), BookSurge
  30. Women in Canada: A Gender-based Statistical Report, "Statistics Canada", Statistics Canada, ~ (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)