공정거래법상 기업결합의 관련시장 획정 - 공정거래위원회의 심결례 분석을 중심으로 -
A Study on defining the relevant market in mergers - Focused on analysis of Free Trade Commission's decisions -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act in Korea prohibits mergers which substantially restrict competition in the line of commerce. The term "the act substantially restrict competition" refers to any of the practices that affect or threaten to affect the setting of price, quantity, quality, or other terms or conditions of trading in accordance with the intent of a certain enterpriser or an enterprisers' organization owing to reduced competition in a line of commerce. Market concentration, which is found based on market share of the company is a key indicator in determining anticompetitive effect due to mergers. In order to calculate market share of the company, it is necessary to specify the 'line of commerce' that is subject to calculation of the company's market share, and this is known as 'relevant market'. Defining relevant market for goods where competition is being questioned, is a prerequisite to determining anticompetitive effect of mergers with respect to the Fair Trade Act. However, defining the relevant market is more than just a precondition in determining anticompetitive effect via mergers; it has a critical role in determining whether the merger restrict competition. Relevant markets refer to the scope of enterprisers which are co-competitors, and thus, broad definition of relevant market lowers the market share or market power of the company thereby alleviating the evaluation standard of anticompetitive effect via mergers. On the other hand, if relevant market is defined narrowly, the opposite effect results. This shows that in determining the illegality of mergers, reasonable and accurate definition of the relevant market is imperative. Therefore, in many merger review cases, the recipient assert the market in mergers defines broadly, which brings the issue of ddefinition of relevant markets an essential issue in merger review cases. This paper thus analyzes how relevant markets defines in Free Trade Commission's decisions related to review of mergers for future in-depth studies on relevant markets.
Abstract
The Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act in Korea prohibits mergers which substantially restrict competition in the line of commerce. The term "the act substantially restrict competition" refers to any of the practices that affect or threaten to affect the setting of price, quantity, quality, or other terms or conditions of trading in accordance with the intent of a certain enterpriser or an enterprisers' organization owing to reduced competition in a line of commerce. Market concentration, which is found based on market share of the company is a key indicator in determining anticompetitive effect due to mergers. In order to calculate market share of the company, it is necessary to specify the 'line of commerce' that is subject to calculation of the company's market share, and this is known as 'relevant market'. Defining relevant market for goods where competition is being questioned, is a prerequisite to determining anticompetitive effect of mergers with respect to the Fair Trade Act. However, defining the relevant market is more than just a precondition in determining anticompetitive effect via mergers; it has a critical role in determining whether the merger restrict competition. Relevant markets refer to the scope of enterprisers which are co-competitors, and thus, broad definition of relevant market lowers the market share or market power of the company thereby alleviating the evaluation standard of anticompetitive effect via mergers. On the other hand, if relevant market is defined narrowly, the opposite effect results. This shows that in determining the illegality of mergers, reasonable and accurate definition of the relevant market is imperative. Therefore, in many merger review cases, the recipient assert the market in mergers defines broadly, which brings the issue of ddefinition of relevant markets an essential issue in merger review cases. This paper thus analyzes how relevant markets defines in Free Trade Commission's decisions related to review of mergers for future in-depth studies on relevant markets.
참고문헌 (16)
- 권오승, "경제법(제7판)" (2009), 법문사
- 신현윤, "경제법(제2판)" (2007), 법문사
- 이호영, "독점규제법의 이론과 실무" (2006), 홍문사
- 이상규, "공정거래법과 규제제도" (2007), 법문사
- 정호열, "경제법 개정 제3판 발행" (2010), 박영사
- 곽 상 현, "기업결합과 관련시장의 획정", 저스티스, (93), pp.36~91 (2006), 한국법학원
- 김재우, "하위(Submarket)시장의 시장획정 : 미국 판례를 중심으로", 경쟁저널, 통권 : 131 (2007)
- 김영호, "企業合倂에 있어 公正去來法上 違法性 判斷要素로서의 市場의 範圍 및 市場占有率", 상사법연구, 24(1), pp.73~109 (2005), 한국상사법학회
- 김현아, "삼익악기ㆍ영창악기 간의 기업결합에 대한 대법원 판결에 대한 소고 -1부 : 관련 상품시장의 획정기준 및 효율성 항변에 관한 판단을 중심으로", 경쟁저널, 통권 : 141 (2008)
- 문재호, "인터넷 쇼핑 분야의 기업결합 심사 사례", 경쟁저널, 통권 : 143 (2009)
- 박익수, "공정거래법상 관련시장의 지역적 범위에 관한 연구:임계매출감소분석에 의한 시장획정을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2006
- 신영수, "대체관계에 있지 않은 상품들에 대한 시장의 일괄획정", 경쟁법연구, 9 (2003)
- 이석준, "온라인 유통업체 기업결합에 있어서 경쟁법적 이슈 검토 :eBay의 G마켓 주식인수 건의 시장획정을 중심으로", 경쟁저널, 통권 : 145 (2009)
- 윤인성, "가. 독점규제 및 공정거래에 관한 법률 제7조에 규정된 기업결합의제한에 해당하는지 여부를 판단하기 위하여 획정하여야 하는 '관련상품에 따른 시장'의 의미와 그 범위의 판단 방법 나. 수평적 기업결합에서 실질적 경쟁제한성이 존재하는지 여부의 판단 방법(2008. 5. 29. 선고 2006두6659 판결:공2008하, 917)"", 대법원판례해설, (75) (2008)
- 천경훈, "통신산업과 혼합결합:에스케이텔레콤과 하나로텔레콤 간 기업결합 사건을 중심으로", IT와 법연구, 3 (2009)
- 홍명수, "시장획정 방식의 개선과 과제", 법과사회, (29), pp.241~273 (2005), 법과사회이론학회
