디지털 샘플링(Digital Sampling)에 관한 저작권법적 연구
Study concerning Digital Sampling in the Copyright Regime
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Due to the existence of computer and development of its technology, anybody may make new music with the help of the synthesizer which is not expensive, and the problems about the digital sampling of sound recording have arisen in Korea. However, Korean courts have not decided any case because most issues about digital sampling have been settled before going to court. Therefore, this article introduces some U.S. cases and BGH cases to help Korean courts to decide in the future. Finally, this article argues the de minimis use test and fair use doctrine in U.S. courts should be applied to most digital sampling case to promote the progress of culture and Korean courts should not follow the BGH reasoning because, in most digital sampling cases, most people may not recognize the original music in the new music.
Abstract
Due to the existence of computer and development of its technology, anybody may make new music with the help of the synthesizer which is not expensive, and the problems about the digital sampling of sound recording have arisen in Korea. However, Korean courts have not decided any case because most issues about digital sampling have been settled before going to court. Therefore, this article introduces some U.S. cases and BGH cases to help Korean courts to decide in the future. Finally, this article argues the de minimis use test and fair use doctrine in U.S. courts should be applied to most digital sampling case to promote the progress of culture and Korean courts should not follow the BGH reasoning because, in most digital sampling cases, most people may not recognize the original music in the new music.
참고문헌 (36)
- 최경수, "저작권법 개론" (2010), 한울
- Carl A. Falstrom, "Note, Thou Shalt Not Steal: Grand Upright Music Ltd. v. Warner Bros. Records, Inc. and the Future of Digital Sound Sampling in Popular Music", Hsatings L.J, 45, pp.359~ (1994)
- Chris Johnstone, "Note, Underground Appeal: A Sample of the Chronic Questions in Copyright Law Pertaining to the Transformative use of Digital Music in a Civil Society", S.Cal. L. Rev, 77, pp.397~ (2004)
- David S. Blessing, "Note, Who Speaks Latin Anymore?: Translating De Minimis Use for Application To Music Copyright Infringement and Sampling", Wm. & Mary L. Rev, 45, pp.2399~ (2004)
- Durham Indus, "630 F.2d 905, 912 (2d Cir. 1980); Chris Johnstone, Note, Underground Appeal: A Sample of the Chronic Questions in Copyright Law Pertaining to the Transformative use of Digital Music in a Civil Society", 77 S.Cal. L. Rev. 397, ~ (2004)
- Ian Eagles, "Some Lessons from German Copyright Law's Encounter with the Sequel", NEW ZEALAND BUS. L. QUARTERLY, 10, pp.109~ (2004)
- J.H. Reichman, "Legal Hybrids Between Patent and Copyright Paradigms", COLUM. L. REV, 94, pp.2432~ (1994)
- "First .Ever Cleared Beatles Sample’ Claim is Incorrect"[URL]
- Kersting, "Singing A Different Tune: Was the Sixth Circuit Justified in Changing the Protection of Sound Recordings in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films", U.Cin. L. Rev, 74, pp.663~ (2005)
- "Leaffer understanding Copyright Law" (1999)
- Mike Suppapola, "Confusion in the Digital Age: Why the Deminimis Use Test Should Be Applied to Digital Samples of Copyrighted Sound Recordings", Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J, 14, pp.93~ (2005)
- Neil Conley, "Metall auf Metall: The Importance of the Kraftwerk Decision for the Sampling of Music in Germany", J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A, 56, pp.1017~ (2009)
- Paul Edward Geller, "Hiroshige vs. Van Gogh: Resolving the Dilemma of Copyright Scope in Remedying Infringement", J. COPYRIGHT SOC'Y U.S.A, 46, pp.39~ (1998)
- Recent Case, "Copyright Law - Sound Recording Act- Sixth Circuit Rejects De Minimis Defense to the infringement of a Sound Recording Copyright - Bridgeport Muisc, Inc. v. Dimension Films", Harv. L. Rev, 118, pp.1355~ (2005)
- Robert M. Szymanski, "Audio Pasitiche: Digital Sampling, Intermediate Copying, Fair Use", U.C.L.A. Ent. L. Rev, 3, pp.271~277 (1996)
- David Sanjek, "Don't Have to DJ No More":Sampling and the "Autonomous", Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J, 10, pp.607~ (1992)
- Simon Apel, "Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films (USA), Metall auf Metall (Germany) and Digital Sound Sampling –“Bright Line Rules”", ZEITSCHRIFT Fü GEISTIGES EIGENTUM, IPJ), pp.2010, 2[DOI]
- Sykes, "The De Minimis Defense in Copyright Infringement Actions Involving Music Sampling", U. Mem. L. Rev, 36(749) (2006)
- Tom Braegelmann, "Copyright Law in and Under the Constitution: The Constitutional Scope and Limits to Copyright Law in the United States in Comparison With the Scope and Limits Imposed by Constitutional and European Law on Copyright Law in Germany", CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J, 27, pp.99~ (1999)
- Armstein v. Porter, "154 F.2d 464", ~ (1946)
- Bridgeport Music v, "Michael Diamond 410 F.3d", ~ (2005)
- FCA 982, , 2004
- Elsmere Music, "Inc. v", National Broadcasting Co, ~ (1980)
- Fisher v. Dees, "794 F.2d 432 (9th Cir", ~ (1986)
- Grand Upright Music Ltd, "v. Warner Bros", Records, Inc, 780 F.Supp. 182 (S.D.N.Y 1991), ~ (1991)
- Hyperion Records Ltd v Warner Music (UK) Ltd, "unreported, Chancery Division of the High Court", ~ (1991)
- Jarvis v. A&M Records, "827 F.Supp. 282", ~ (1993)
- F.S.R. 57, , 2002
- Marlon Williams v, "2001 WL 984714 (S.D.N.Y", ~ (2001)
- Newton v, "Diamond 204 F.Supp. 2d 1244", ~ (2002)
- Newton v, "Diamond 349 F.3d 591", ~ (2003)
- Ringgold v, "Black Entern't Television, Inc", 126 F.3d. 70 (2d Cir, ~ (1997)
- Saregama India Ltd, "v. Mosley 635 F.3d 1284", ~ (2011)
- Saregama India Ltd. v, "Tim Mosley, 687 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (S.D. Fla" (2009)
- Tuff 'N" Rumble Management, "v. Profile Records, Inc., 1977 WL 158364", S.D.N.Y. Apr.2, ~ (1997)
- –FCA 812, , 2003