상표권 라이선스의 공정화를 위한 심사지침의 개정방안 연구
A Study on the Revision of Examination Guidelines on Improper Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights for Fair Trademark Rights License Agreement
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Contrast to Patent, Trademark focuses on protecting and maintaining the brand value which is presented in the relevant market rather than the innovative technical power. In general, major firms like multinational companies tend to receive higher brand value; therefore the transaction party, licensee, who is permitted to use the Trademark, is likely to be small and medium-sized companies. Therefore, although there needs to be a specific regulation to prevent unfair trademark rights license agreement for the licensee, as the screening principle and guideline is set based on Patent, it is difficult to apply to problematic situations in relation to Trademark. As such, it is crucial to add a rule reflecting peculiarity of Trademark to the existing screening principle or establish a new one due to the unique structure around trademark rights. In relation to the above, firstly this paper will review the related legal concepts prior to discussing trademark rights license agreement in detail by checking ⅰ) different types of Trademark rights license, ⅱ) the rights and duties around the licensor and the licensee under the Trademark law, and ⅲ) the relationship between the exclusive license and non-exclusive license, as a result that effective of registration of exclusive licenses has been changed. Secondly, this paper will examine the regulations related to Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act applicable to the Trademark rights license agreement. It will specifically look into anti-fraud provisions and abuse of market-dominant position on ‘Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act’, ‘Examination Guidelines on Improper Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights’ and ‘Guideline on fair Patent license agreement’ to observe how each guideline is applicable to Trademark rights license. Thirdly, this paper will propose revision on the current regulation which is the main purpose of this research firstly by providing contents that needs to be added onto ‘Examination Guidelines on Improper Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights’, and set standards on unfairness of refusal to trademark rights license and No-challenge obligation, and restrictions on sub-license. Lastly, this paper will make proposition to enact new guideline on ‘fair trademark rights license agreement’ by anticipating issues that can arise over settlement conditions, planning on standard of quality assurance related to cancellation of agreement, problems over applying the abuse of right on practicing non-use trademark, necessity on the regulation of prescribing the relationship between the abuse of trademark rights and legal notion on Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act, specific regulations focused on the characteristics of the agreement with multinational companies, and the need of a general outline explaining the classification on unfair terms and conditions will be discussed.
Abstract
Contrast to Patent, Trademark focuses on protecting and maintaining the brand value which is presented in the relevant market rather than the innovative technical power. In general, major firms like multinational companies tend to receive higher brand value; therefore the transaction party, licensee, who is permitted to use the Trademark, is likely to be small and medium-sized companies. Therefore, although there needs to be a specific regulation to prevent unfair trademark rights license agreement for the licensee, as the screening principle and guideline is set based on Patent, it is difficult to apply to problematic situations in relation to Trademark. As such, it is crucial to add a rule reflecting peculiarity of Trademark to the existing screening principle or establish a new one due to the unique structure around trademark rights. In relation to the above, firstly this paper will review the related legal concepts prior to discussing trademark rights license agreement in detail by checking ⅰ) different types of Trademark rights license, ⅱ) the rights and duties around the licensor and the licensee under the Trademark law, and ⅲ) the relationship between the exclusive license and non-exclusive license, as a result that effective of registration of exclusive licenses has been changed. Secondly, this paper will examine the regulations related to Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act applicable to the Trademark rights license agreement. It will specifically look into anti-fraud provisions and abuse of market-dominant position on ‘Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act’, ‘Examination Guidelines on Improper Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights’ and ‘Guideline on fair Patent license agreement’ to observe how each guideline is applicable to Trademark rights license. Thirdly, this paper will propose revision on the current regulation which is the main purpose of this research firstly by providing contents that needs to be added onto ‘Examination Guidelines on Improper Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights’, and set standards on unfairness of refusal to trademark rights license and No-challenge obligation, and restrictions on sub-license. Lastly, this paper will make proposition to enact new guideline on ‘fair trademark rights license agreement’ by anticipating issues that can arise over settlement conditions, planning on standard of quality assurance related to cancellation of agreement, problems over applying the abuse of right on practicing non-use trademark, necessity on the regulation of prescribing the relationship between the abuse of trademark rights and legal notion on Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act, specific regulations focused on the characteristics of the agreement with multinational companies, and the need of a general outline explaining the classification on unfair terms and conditions will be discussed.
참고문헌 (16)
- 송인방, "공정거래법" (2012), 충남대학교출판문화원
- 박수영, "공정거래법해설" (2012), fides
- 사법연수원, "공정거래법" (2011)
- 유진희, "경제법(제9판)" (2012), 세창출판사
- 임상길, "공정거래법판례연구" (2011), 세경사
- 정태호, "OVA상표법" (2011), 춘추문화사
- 백형기, "라이선스 남용과 독점규제법 적용의 한계 - 영미의 사례를 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 20(2), pp.71~88 (2006), 한국기업법학회
- 설민수, "지적재산권 사용계약에 대한 거래거절에 관한 미국과 EU에서의 공정거래법 적용", 저스티스, (101), pp.60~107 (2007), 한국법학원
- 손영화, "지적재산권 라이센스 거절에 대한 공정거래법의 적용 - EU 신규칙 및 일본의 신지침을 중심으로 -", 한양법학, (29), pp.631~655 (2010), 한양법학회
- 이황, "공정거래법상 단독의 위반행위 규제의 체계(Ⅱ) - 불공정거래행위로서의 거래거절행위의 위법성, 그 본질과 판단기준(판례를 중심으로)", 경제법연구, 9(2), pp.105~140 (2010), 한국경제법학회
- 조성국, "시장지배적 지위 남용행위 위법성 판단기준에 관한 연구", 포스코 판결 5주년 : 판결의 의미와 향후 발전방향-21세기 중요 판결 재조정Ⅰ-, 2013년 ICR센터 기획 세미나 (2013)
- 한세론, "미국의 계속적 거래관계에서의 거래거절에 대한 경쟁법상 규제", 최신외국법제정보, (3) (2013), 한국법제연구원
- 明石一秀, "ブランド管理の法實務 商標法を中心とする" (2013), 三協法規出版
- 吉川達夫, "ライセンス契約のすべて-ビヅネスリスクと法的マネジメント" (2011), レクシスネクシス‧ジャパン株式會社
- 村上政博, "獨占禁止法の新展開" (2011), 判例タイムズ社
- Erik W. Kahn, "Trademark License Agreements Line by Line" (2009), ASPATORE
