본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

점유취득시효 완성자의 대상청구권

A Study on a claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

A claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property provide the clause 281 in section 1 of the German Civil Act and the clause 1303 of the France Civil Act. but claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property don't provide in the Korean Civil ct. therefore, whether or not claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property admit, the dispute exist. But, the admit of claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property in interpretation are the large number view and the Supreme Court view on the ground that the reversion to the authentic rightful person of the property worth of the self-not reversion was based on the fairness principles flowing the whole civil act. but I doubt the propriety of admit for the claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property in not only the effect of the fulfillment- impossible but also the effect of the completion of the acquisitive prescription by Supreme Court. For claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property provide, the fulfillment of debt have to be impossible post factum because the existence of the credit and the debt between the parties was premised. but I have a doubt for the whether or not the credit and the debt in the parties exist in the acquisitive prescription of real property. Therefore, in thesis, I try to study the propriety of admit for the claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property by Supreme Court. In studying these problems, first, I try to study the general theory of claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property, next, I try to study the legal position of the possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property. last, I try to study the supreme court attitude for the admit of claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property

Abstract

A claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property provide the clause 281 in section 1 of the German Civil Act and the clause 1303 of the France Civil Act. but claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property don't provide in the Korean Civil ct. therefore, whether or not claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property admit, the dispute exist. But, the admit of claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property in interpretation are the large number view and the Supreme Court view on the ground that the reversion to the authentic rightful person of the property worth of the self-not reversion was based on the fairness principles flowing the whole civil act. but I doubt the propriety of admit for the claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property in not only the effect of the fulfillment- impossible but also the effect of the completion of the acquisitive prescription by Supreme Court. For claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property provide, the fulfillment of debt have to be impossible post factum because the existence of the credit and the debt between the parties was premised. but I have a doubt for the whether or not the credit and the debt in the parties exist in the acquisitive prescription of real property. Therefore, in thesis, I try to study the propriety of admit for the claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property by Supreme Court. In studying these problems, first, I try to study the general theory of claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property, next, I try to study the legal position of the possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property. last, I try to study the supreme court attitude for the admit of claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 곽윤직, "채권총론" (1992), 박영사
  2. "대상청구권에 대한 입법론적 고찰", 법학연구(원광대), 22
  3. 김성용, "대상 청구권의 발생요건", 한양법학, 8
  4. 문흥수, "점유취득시효 완성후의 시효취득자, 소유명의자, 제3취득자 상호간의 관계", 법조 (1996)
  5. 송덕수, "대상청구권", 민사판례연구, 16 (1994), 박영사
  6. 송덕수, "대상청구권의 인정범위와 내용 in 판례실무연구(1)" (1997), 박영사
  7. 송덕수, "이행불능에 있어서 이른바 대상청구권", 경찰대학논문집, 4
  8. 안법영, "채권적 대상청구권 in 김형배 교수 화갑기념논문" (1994), 박영사
  9. 양창수, "매매목적토지의 수용과 보상금에 대한 대상청구권" (1993)
  10. 양창수, "민법주해 1X(채권2)" (1995), 박영사
  11. 윤홍철, "이행불능에 있어서 대상청구권", 고시연구 (1991)
  12. 이상경, "대상청구권, in 민사재판의 제문제(상)(송천? 이시윤박사회갑기념논문집)" (1995), 박영사
  13. 이은애, "우리 민법상의 이른바 대상청구권의 인정", 사법논집, 26 (1995), 법원도서관
  14. 이태재, "채권총론" (1981)
  15. 제헌웅, "대상청구권의 적용범위", 사법연구, 4 (1999), 청림출판사
  16. 지원림, "대상청구권 in 민법학논총 제2권(후암 곽윤직선생 고희기념논문집)" (1995), 박영사
  17. 지원림, "점유취득시효 완성 이후의 사정변경과? 대상청구권", 민사판례연구, 18 (1996), 박영사
  18. 지원림, "점유취득시효완성이후의 사정변경과 대상청구권", 민사판례연구, 18, 박영사
  19. 최병조, "대상청구권에 관한 소고 in 판례실무연구(1)", 박영사
  20. 최병조, "로마법 ? 민법논고" (1999), 박영사
  21. 현승종, "게르만법" (1994), 박영사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)