형법상 사람의 시기(始期)와 태아의 법적 보호
The Protection of Fetus at the criminal viewpoint
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The recent Supreme Court of Korea ruling about fetus in some case. The focus of the case were when a fetus becomes human being, whether the to-be-born have virtually no protection in law against abuse, neglect, assault or injury. There is an article about fetus in criminal law of Korea. But the Criminal Code §269-270 are regulating the act that are committed on purpose. The one who don't convict violence to fetus on purpose, if he(she) do it with gross negligence, he(she) is not in charge of criminal liability as professional negligence resulting in death. But, recently, with progress of medical science and biotechnology, the protection of fetus as alive being or potentiality of human being to be protected by law are under debate. Should the legislature enact new legislation providing some form of legal protection to the fetus. What is required to begin to deal with the issue is new legislation. Without legislation the Supreme Court does not have a constitutional issue to consider
Abstract
The recent Supreme Court of Korea ruling about fetus in some case. The focus of the case were when a fetus becomes human being, whether the to-be-born have virtually no protection in law against abuse, neglect, assault or injury. There is an article about fetus in criminal law of Korea. But the Criminal Code §269-270 are regulating the act that are committed on purpose. The one who don't convict violence to fetus on purpose, if he(she) do it with gross negligence, he(she) is not in charge of criminal liability as professional negligence resulting in death. But, recently, with progress of medical science and biotechnology, the protection of fetus as alive being or potentiality of human being to be protected by law are under debate. Should the legislature enact new legislation providing some form of legal protection to the fetus. What is required to begin to deal with the issue is new legislation. Without legislation the Supreme Court does not have a constitutional issue to consider
참고문헌 (19)
- 강구진, "형법강의 각론Ⅰ" (1984)
- 권창국, "형법 상 사람의 시기(始期)와 태아(胎兒)에 대한 형법적 보호문제의 고찰", 형사정책연구, 18(2)
- 김일수, "형법각론" (2004)
- 박상기, "형법각론" (2008)
- 박양빈, "태아에 대한 상해" (1996), 고시계
- 배종대, "형법각론" (2004)
- 오영근, "형법각론", pp.16~ (2002)
- 유기천, (1989)
- 이재상, "형법각론(제5판)", pp.13~ (2004)
- 임? 웅, "형법각론 개정판" (2003)
- Carolyn B. Ramsey, "RESTRUCTURING THE DEBATE OVER FETAL HOMICIDE LAWS", Ohio State Law Journal (2006)
- Wayne R.LaFave, "Criminal Law 3rd edt" (2000), West Group
- Heinrich Henkel, "Einfuhrung in die Rechtsphilosophie, 2" (1977)
- 齊藤誠二, "における生命の保護" (1988)
- 上田健二, "胎兒傷害, 刑法判例百選 II 各論 第5版, 別冊 ジュリスト No. 167" (2003)
- 平野龍一, "犯罪論の諸問題(下)" (1982)
- 前田雅英, "刑法各論" (2007)
- 西田典之, "刑法各論" (2005)
- 山口厚, "刑法各論" (2005)