醫師와 患者의 法律關係에 관한 考察
A study on the juridical relation of doctor and patient
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As a rule, the juridical relation of doctor and the patient in compliance with a contract is formed. But the juridical relation of doctor and the patient in compliance with a contract not to be, the case which is formed is. In principle, the medical treatment contract is compensatory contract. The motion form which is drawn up in name of operation written consent etc. roughly about contents or dangerousness of medical treatment act is becoming the explanation and is becoming the autographic signature and limits in case and the legal effect is recognized. Therefore the motion form which is formal is not a legal effect. About legal nature of medical treatment contract the various theory is opposing. The common opinion is charge contract opinion but the attitude of judicial precedent is not clearly. About patient debt of doctor is not result debt but means debt. Doctor legal as a matter of duty without the case which will give medical treatment the patient, relationship of doctor and the patient office management or must understand in factual contract. The person concerned of medical treatment contract generally is doctor and the patient. But the case where the legal representative or the guardian substitutes the patient is. When the medical treatment contract is formed, doctor is made to charge a medical treatment duty and the patient makes a repair urgent duty charge. In addition, doctor explanation duty, secret outstanding duty and medical treatment record duty, charges all the member obligatory etc. And the patient charges a medical treatment cooperative duty.
Abstract
As a rule, the juridical relation of doctor and the patient in compliance with a contract is formed. But the juridical relation of doctor and the patient in compliance with a contract not to be, the case which is formed is. In principle, the medical treatment contract is compensatory contract. The motion form which is drawn up in name of operation written consent etc. roughly about contents or dangerousness of medical treatment act is becoming the explanation and is becoming the autographic signature and limits in case and the legal effect is recognized. Therefore the motion form which is formal is not a legal effect. About legal nature of medical treatment contract the various theory is opposing. The common opinion is charge contract opinion but the attitude of judicial precedent is not clearly. About patient debt of doctor is not result debt but means debt. Doctor legal as a matter of duty without the case which will give medical treatment the patient, relationship of doctor and the patient office management or must understand in factual contract. The person concerned of medical treatment contract generally is doctor and the patient. But the case where the legal representative or the guardian substitutes the patient is. When the medical treatment contract is formed, doctor is made to charge a medical treatment duty and the patient makes a repair urgent duty charge. In addition, doctor explanation duty, secret outstanding duty and medical treatment record duty, charges all the member obligatory etc. And the patient charges a medical treatment cooperative duty.
참고문헌 (35)
- 姜南鎭, "의료계약에 관한 소고" (2000), 법문사
- 郭潤直, "채권각론" (1998), 박영사
- 權用雨, "진료과오 및 약화사고의 책임", 단국대논문, 15 (1981), 단국대학교 출판부
- 權用雨, "의료과오의 책임", 법률연구, 3 (1983), 연세대학교 법률문제연구소
- 金亨培, "민법학강의" (1999), 신조사
- 金天秀, "진료계약", 민사법학, (15) (1997), 한국사법행정학회
- 金天秀, "진료에 대한 설명과 동의의 법리" (1999), 대구대학교 출판부
- 金玟中, "의료계약", 사법행정, 32(1) (1991), 한국사법행정학회
- 金玟中, "계약과 제3자. in: 민법학의 회고와 전망 : 민법전시행30주년기념논문집" (1993), 한국사법행정학회
- 제3자를 위한 보호효가 있는 계약, "金玟中", 고시연구사, ~ (1994)
- 金玟中, "의사법이론의 발전과 문제점", 법학연구, 21 (1999), 전북대학교 법학연구소
- 金玟中, "의료분쟁의 법률지식" (2000), 청림출판
- 金玟中, "의료계약" (2006), 청림출판
- 金勝年, "의료과오에 대한 손해배상책임", 고시원, ~ (1982)
- 金容漢, "의료행위에 의한 책임", 법조, 32(6) (1983), 법조협회
- 金顯泰, "의사의 진료과오에 있어서의 과실의 입증책임", 연세대 연세행정논총, 7 (1981), 연세대학교
- 金喆洙, "의료분쟁해결에 있어서 의사의 민사책임", 박사, pp.2000
- 文國鎭, "의료법학" (1991), 청림출판
- 徐光民, "진료계약의 법률관계", 고시계, 37(9) (1992), 국가고시학회
- 石熙泰, "의사와 환자의 기초적 법률관계", 연세대 법률연구, 3 (1983), 법문사
- 石熙泰, "의료과오 민사책임에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1988
- 石熙泰, "의료계약의 법적 성질과 내용", 월간고시, 21(3) (1994), 법지사
- 申鉉昊, "의료소송총론" (1997), 육법사
- 宋德洙, "제3자보호 효력있는 계약" (1985), 박영사
- 尹景鉉, "의료과오의 책임", 사법논집, 6 (1975), 대법원 법원행정처
- 李輔煥, "의료과오로 인한 민사책임의 법률적 구성", 재판자료, 27 (1985), 대법원법원행정처
- 李德煥, "민법상 의사의 설명의무법리에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1991
- 李德煥, "의료행위와 법" (1998), 문영사
- 李永煥, "의료계약과 환자의 승낙", 고시계, 29(4) (1984), 국가고시학회
- 李銀榮, "채권각론" (1999), 박영사
- 黃迪仁, "현대민법론〔Ⅳ〕" (1987), 박영사
- 최행식, "의료행위와 의료계약에 관한 기초론적 고찰", 법학연구, 14(14), pp.587~614 (2004), 한국법학회
- 秋昊卿, "의료과오론" (1992), 육법사
- E.Deutsch, "Arztrecht and Arzneimittelrecht" (1983), Springer Verlag
- Linzbach G, "Informed Consent" (1980), Verlag Peter D.Lang
