유럽연합의 민주주의 결여 극복 노력의 함의
European Union's effort to overcome Democratic Deficit
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ostensibly, as European Union is not possessed of it own territory and people, it is difficult to say that the Union has the sovereignty of its own. Even though it is announced that European Union is possessed of sovereignty in Costa v. ENEL, the transfer of sovereignty declared on the case is just based on a limitation of sovereignty or a transfer of powers. Furthermore the transfer of sovereignty is possibile on the premise of the consent of Member States in European Union. Thus it should be noted that European Union is not possessed of its own initiative in proceeding the integration of European Union. Of course European Union is to be evaluated as the sui generis entity on the ground that it obtains various characteristics in integration such as its own legal order, de facto power of separation, the system of judicial review and the concept of Citizenship etc. Nonetheless European Union has a great deal of difficulties in its own integration considering the opinion of German federal constitutional court(Budesverfassungsgerichtbarkeit) that the Member States are the authentic Masters of Treaties(Herren der Verträge) rather that the European Union. In spite of these difficulties in integration, European Union has not forsaken the purpose and willingness for integration especially considering its trial for the Treaty for European Union establishing Constitution. Even though the trial was failed, European Union has not still abandoned the purpose and willingness for integration with a focus of the power of European Parliament. In other words European Union has reinforced the power(legislative power) of European Parliament from its outset. And European Union has tried to enhance the power of European Parliament at Lisbon Treaty such as co-decision procedure(TFEU Article 289, Article 294), election of the President of the Commission(Article 17), the power of regulation(Article 290) and the power of budget(TFEU Article 314) etc. Taking into consideration of those aspects concerning the power of European Parliament, it is postulated that European Union tried to reinforce its own democratic legitimacy. Thus we can conclude that European Union has managed to overcome its democratic deficit and to secure its position for integration by reinforcing the power and status of European Parliament.
Abstract
Ostensibly, as European Union is not possessed of it own territory and people, it is difficult to say that the Union has the sovereignty of its own. Even though it is announced that European Union is possessed of sovereignty in Costa v. ENEL, the transfer of sovereignty declared on the case is just based on a limitation of sovereignty or a transfer of powers. Furthermore the transfer of sovereignty is possibile on the premise of the consent of Member States in European Union. Thus it should be noted that European Union is not possessed of its own initiative in proceeding the integration of European Union. Of course European Union is to be evaluated as the sui generis entity on the ground that it obtains various characteristics in integration such as its own legal order, de facto power of separation, the system of judicial review and the concept of Citizenship etc. Nonetheless European Union has a great deal of difficulties in its own integration considering the opinion of German federal constitutional court(Budesverfassungsgerichtbarkeit) that the Member States are the authentic Masters of Treaties(Herren der Verträge) rather that the European Union. In spite of these difficulties in integration, European Union has not forsaken the purpose and willingness for integration especially considering its trial for the Treaty for European Union establishing Constitution. Even though the trial was failed, European Union has not still abandoned the purpose and willingness for integration with a focus of the power of European Parliament. In other words European Union has reinforced the power(legislative power) of European Parliament from its outset. And European Union has tried to enhance the power of European Parliament at Lisbon Treaty such as co-decision procedure(TFEU Article 289, Article 294), election of the President of the Commission(Article 17), the power of regulation(Article 290) and the power of budget(TFEU Article 314) etc. Taking into consideration of those aspects concerning the power of European Parliament, it is postulated that European Union tried to reinforce its own democratic legitimacy. Thus we can conclude that European Union has managed to overcome its democratic deficit and to secure its position for integration by reinforcing the power and status of European Parliament.
참고문헌 (47)
- 강원택, "유럽연합의 발전과 전망: 유럽의 부활" (1999), 푸른 길
- 아르민 폰 복단디, "번역: 유럽을 위한 헌법원리들", 헌법학연구, 13(3), pp.881~924 (2007), 한국헌법학회
- 이종광, "유럽통합의 이상과 현실" (1996), 일신사
- 장영수, "국가조직론" (2005), 홍문사
- 이준일, "헌법학강의 (제3판)", pp.159~ (2008), 홍문사
- 정인섭, "신국제법강의" (2010), 박영사
- 김은경, "유럽연합시민권의 법적 개념과 의미", 유럽연구, 17, pp.305~326 (2003), 한국유럽학회
- 성선제, "조약의 사법심사 - 미국의 경우를 중심으로", 법학연구, 20(1), pp.3~36 (2009), 법학연구소
- 송호영, "유럽연합(EU) 차원의 私法統一이 EU회원국들의 國內法에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 외법논집, 34(3), pp.127~143 (2010), 법학연구소
- 이주윤, "EU 주요 기관의 기능과 역할" (2010), 박영사
- 이철우, "EU 시민권과 이주자의 지위" (2011), 박영사
- 장영수, "현행헌법상 권력분립의 기본체계", 법학논집, 31 (1995), 고려대학교 법학연구소
- 정재각, "유럽연합: 정치체계에서 국가성과 유럽의회의 논의", 한독사회과학논총, 17(3), pp.117~146 (2007), 한독사회과학회
- 최진우, "유럽의회의 발전과 유럽통합(유럽연합의 민주성과 정통성)", 국제정치논총, 39(2) (1999)
- 한정훈, "제도적 측면에서 바라본 유럽연합의 정치적 대표: 공동결정절차 (Codecision Procedure)를 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 48(4), pp.191~216 (2008), 한국국제정치학회
- Arndt, "Europarecht", pp.9~ (2008), Aufl
- Craig, Paul, "EU Law" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Folsom, "European Union in a Nutshell" (2008), Thomson
- Foster, Nigel, "Foster on EU law" (2006), Oxford University
- Habermas, "Legitimationsprobleme in späkapitalismus" (1973), Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
- Horspool, Margot, "European Union Law" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Lavranos, "Legal Interaction Between Decisions of International Organizations and European Law" (2004), Europa Law Publishing Groningen
- Opperman, "Europarecht", pp.4~ (2009), Aufl
- Rosas, Allan, "EU Constitutional Law" (2010), Hart Publishing
- Sands Q. C, "Bowett's Law of International Institutions" (2009), Sweet & Maxwell
- 08 in Der Vertrag von Lissabon: Reform der EU ohne Verfassung, "Europas Neue Nühternheit: Der Vertrag von Lissabon, FCE 1", pp.2008, Papier
- Taylor, "The End of European Integration-Anti-Europeanism Exammined" (2008), Routledge
- Weatherill, "EU Law -Cases & Materials" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Baumgart, (2009)
- Closa, Carlos, "The Concept of Citizenship in the Treaty on European Unio", Common Market Law Review, 29, pp.1137~ (1992)
- Dahl, Robert A, "Is international democracy possible? A critical view Democracy and Federalism in the European Union and the United States" (2005), Routledge
- Grimm, "Defending Sovereign Statehood against Transforming the European Union into a State", pp.5~ (2009), European Constitutional Law Review
- Hailbronner, Kay, "Constitutional Law in Introduction to German Law" (1996), Kluwer Law International
- Høegh, K, "The Danish Maastricht Judgement", pp.24~ (1999), European Law Review
- Köig, Christian, "Rechtspersölichkeit fü die Europäsche Union" (2000), Europäsche Zeitschrift fü Wirtshaftrecht
- Junbo, "Impact of the Eastern Enlargement on the EU's Legitimacy The Enlarged European Union" (2008), Nomos
- Lavranos, "The Interface between European and National Procedural Law: UN Sanctions and Judicial Review in Interface between EU Law and National Law" (2007), Europa Law Publishing
- Lindseth, "Delegation is Dead, Long Live Delegation: Managing the Democratic Disconnect in the European Market-Policy in Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Market" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Mather, "The Citizenry: Legitimacy and Democracy in European Union Enlargement" (2004), Palgrave Macmillan
- Moxon-Browne, "Citizens and Parliaments Constitution-Building in the European Union" (1996), Institute of European Affairs
- Philip Norton, "Parliaments: A Framework for Analysis in Parliaments in Western Europe" (1990), Frank Cass
- Offe, C, "Gibt es eine europanische Gesellshaft? Kann es sie geben?"", pp.4~ (2001), Bläter fü deutsche und internationalle politik
- Smith, "The 1994 European Union Elections: Twelve into One Won't Go in The Crisis of Representation in Europe" (1995), Frank Cass & Co. Ltd
- Weiler, "The Community System: the Dual Character of Supernationalism" (1981), Yearbook of European Law
- Wiener, Anjie, "Constitution-making and Citizenship Practice-Bridging the Democracy Gap in the EU?"", Journal of Common Market Studies, 35(4) (1997)
- 박인수, "유럽헌법상의 권력분립 원칙", 유럽헌법의 기본원리(제1회 유럽헌법학회 창립총회 및 학술 발표회 자료집
- 정문식, "리스본 체제에서 유럽연합 의회의 역할과 의미 변화", 전남대학교 법학연 구소 공동학술대회 자료집 (2010)