본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effects of Free Trade Agreements and Market Openness on U.S. Export Diversification

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Classical international trade theories emphasize comparative advantages that arise from specialization without taking into account the fact that specialization exposes the exporting country to product risk and market risk. Therefore, in the second half of the 20th century, economists have studied diversification strategies to manage export risk. However, there has been almost no empirical study on the U.S export diversification. At the same time, preferential trade arrangements are flourishing with the Doha round in a stalemate. This paper thus tries to examine the relationships between FTAs as well as trade openness on export diversification of the United States. Employing Hummels and Klenow’s intensive and extensive margins, proxies for degrees of export specialization and diversification, my empirical study suggests that trade openness of export partners increase the U.S. extensive margins while entering into FTAs increases the U.S. intensive margins. Extensive margins are often associated with export risk management while intensive margins tend to be regarded as increasing the total export value. This suggests that the U.S., just like any other country in the world, also faces an inherent tradeoff between greater returns due to specialization and greater exposure to shocks from the world market. The United States nevertheless remains in a strong position that allows it not to worry about export risks because it is currently exporting the largest number of categories among the world’s top 7 exporters to almost all the export markets in the world. Hence, the United States would be far better off by keeping up with its pursuit of FTAs rather than trying to urge its partners to open up more. Doing so would definitely help the U.S. increase its exports in absolute amount.

Abstract

Classical international trade theories emphasize comparative advantages that arise from specialization without taking into account the fact that specialization exposes the exporting country to product risk and market risk. Therefore, in the second half of the 20th century, economists have studied diversification strategies to manage export risk. However, there has been almost no empirical study on the U.S export diversification. At the same time, preferential trade arrangements are flourishing with the Doha round in a stalemate. This paper thus tries to examine the relationships between FTAs as well as trade openness on export diversification of the United States. Employing Hummels and Klenow’s intensive and extensive margins, proxies for degrees of export specialization and diversification, my empirical study suggests that trade openness of export partners increase the U.S. extensive margins while entering into FTAs increases the U.S. intensive margins. Extensive margins are often associated with export risk management while intensive margins tend to be regarded as increasing the total export value. This suggests that the U.S., just like any other country in the world, also faces an inherent tradeoff between greater returns due to specialization and greater exposure to shocks from the world market. The United States nevertheless remains in a strong position that allows it not to worry about export risks because it is currently exporting the largest number of categories among the world’s top 7 exporters to almost all the export markets in the world. Hence, the United States would be far better off by keeping up with its pursuit of FTAs rather than trying to urge its partners to open up more. Doing so would definitely help the U.S. increase its exports in absolute amount.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Export Diversification and Growth in Emerging Economies, "Agosin, Manuel R", Universidad de Chile Working Paper, ~, pp.No.233 (2007)
  2. Anderson, James E, "International Trade with Fluctuating Prices", International Economic Review, 17, pp.76~97 (1976)
  3. The Anatomy of China’s Export Growth, "Amiti, Mary", The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, ~, pp.Series 4628 (2008)
  4. Batra, Ravi, "Production Uncertainty and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem", Review of Economic Studies, 69, pp.259~268 (1975)
  5. Export Diversification and Price Uncertainty in Sub-Saharan Africa and Other Developing Countries: A Portfolio Theory Approach, "Bertinelli, Luisito, Salins, Veronique", Ecolé Polytechnique, Paris, ~ (2006)
  6. The Role of Extensive and Intensive Margins and Export Growth, "Besedes, Tibor", NBER Working Papers, ~, pp.13628 (2007)
  7. The Effects of Multilateral Trade Liberalization on the Extensive and the Intensive Margins of Trade, "Christodoulopoulou, Styliani", Munich Personal RePEC Archive Working Paper, ~, pp.No. 29169 (2010)
  8. Cuddington, John T., "Uncertainty, Trade, and Capital Flows in Sub-Saharan Africa", Journal of African Economies, 5(3), pp.192~224 (1996)
  9. Dutt, Pushan, Mihov, Ilian, "Does WTO Matter for the Extensive and the Intensive Margins of Trade?", unpublished thesis (2011), INSEAD
  10. Eaton, Jonathan, "The Margins of Entry into Export Markets: Evidence from Colombia,” , In The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy", pp.231~272 (2008), MA: Harvard University Press
  11. Export Growth in Developing Countries: Market Entry and Bilateral Trade Flows, "Evenett, Simon J.", University of Bern, ~ (2002)
  12. Felbermayr, Gabriel J., "Exploring the Intensive and Extensive Margins of World Trade", Review of World Economics, 142(4), pp.642~674 (2006)
  13. Helpman, Elhanan, "Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2) (2008)
  14. Hillberry, Russell, "A Decomposition of North American Trade Growth Since NAFTA", International Economic Review, (3527), pp.1~6 (2002), USITC Publication
  15. Hummels, David, "The Variety and Quality of a Nation’s Exports", American Economic Review, 95(3), pp.704~723 (2005)
  16. Kemp, Murray C., "Production and Trade Patterns under Uncertainty", Economic Record, 49, pp.215~227 (1973)
  17. Krugman, Paul R., "International Economics: Theory & Policy. 8th edition" (2009), New York: Prentice Hall
  18. Prebisch, Raul, "The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems", Reprinted in Economic Bulletin for Latin America, 7(1) (1962)
  19. Ruffin, Roy, "International Trade under Uncertainty", Journal of International Economics, 4, pp.243~259 (1974)
  20. Singer, Hans, "The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Sectors", American Economic Review, 40(2), pp.473~485 (1950)
  21. Wilhelms, Christian, "Export Diversification in Latin America", Intereconomics, 2, pp.46~48 (1967)
  22. "Bank of Korea"[URL]
  23. "International Monetary Fund"[URL]
  24. "International Trade Data"[URL]
  25. "Office of the United States Trade Representative"[URL]
  26. "Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania"[URL]
  27. "United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database"[URL]
  28. "World Trade Organization"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)