The North Korean Nuclear Threat and South Korea’s Identity Politics in 2006
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
North Korea’s nuclear test in 2006 marked a critical stage, making North Korea a de facto nuclear state. But South Korea’s response was unexpectedly restrained,providing enough grounds for construing the Roh administration’s behavior as “underbalancing.” Nevertheless, the Roh administration’s response is difficult to explain using neoclassical realist theory, even if there was some kind of “underbalancing” phenomenon. In the case of South Korea, it is impossible to generalize about how domestic politics is reflected in foreign policy with several domestic variables. In South Korea, inter-Korean relations are deeply linked to domestic politics, because policy toward North Korea includes cultural elements such as identity and norms. South Korea’s response to the North Korean nuclear issue, particularly the Roh administration’s countermeasures to North Korea’s first nuclear test, shows the merits of constructivism, which emphasizes culturalinstitutional elements such as norms and identity.
Abstract
North Korea’s nuclear test in 2006 marked a critical stage, making North Korea a de facto nuclear state. But South Korea’s response was unexpectedly restrained,providing enough grounds for construing the Roh administration’s behavior as “underbalancing.” Nevertheless, the Roh administration’s response is difficult to explain using neoclassical realist theory, even if there was some kind of “underbalancing” phenomenon. In the case of South Korea, it is impossible to generalize about how domestic politics is reflected in foreign policy with several domestic variables. In South Korea, inter-Korean relations are deeply linked to domestic politics, because policy toward North Korea includes cultural elements such as identity and norms. South Korea’s response to the North Korean nuclear issue, particularly the Roh administration’s countermeasures to North Korea’s first nuclear test, shows the merits of constructivism, which emphasizes culturalinstitutional elements such as norms and identity.
참고문헌 (35)
- CSIS, "The Korean Military Balance", 5~ (2011)
- Randall L. Schweller, "Unanswered Threats: The Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing", International Security, 29(2), pp.159~160 (2004)
- T. V. Paul, "Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy", International Security, 30(1), pp.58~ (2005)
- Steven E. Lobell, "Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Randall L. Schweller, "Unanswered Threats", 168~170
- Jennifer Sterling-Folker, "Neoclassical Realism and Identity: Peril Despite Profit across the Taiwan Strait", Foreign Policy, ~
- Roh Moo-Hyun, "Success and Frustration: President Roh Moo-Hyun’'s Memoir", pp.216~218 (2009), Hakgojae
- Peter J. Katzenstein, "The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics", pp.5~ (1996), Columbia University Press
- Richard Price, "Norms and Deterrence: The Nuclear and Chemical Weapons Taboos", The Culture of National Security, ~
- "Norms, Identity, and National Security in Germany and Japan", The Culture of National Security, ~ (1996)
- Martha Finnemore, "Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention", The Culture of National Security, ~ (1996)
- Robert G. Herman, "Identity, Norms, and National Security: The Soviet Foreign Policy Revolution and the End of the Cold War", ~ (1996)
- Martha Finnemore, "National Interests in International Society" (1996), Cornell University Press
- Katzenstein, "The Culture of National Security", 59~
- Price, "Norms and Deterrence", ~
- Herman, "Identity, Norms, and National Security", ~
- Berger, "Norms, Identity, and National Security", ~
- Elizabeth Kier, "Culture and French Military Doctrine before World War II", The Culture of National Security, ~ (1996)
- Ronald L. Jepperson, "Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security", The Culture of National Security, 58~59 (1996)
- Stefano Guzzini, "A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations", European Journal of International Relations, 6(2) (2000)
- Maja Zehfuss, "Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Janice Bially Mattern, "Why ‘'Soft Power’' Isn’'t So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics", Journal of International Studies, 33(3) (2005)
- Vincent Pouliot, "Toward a Bourdieusian Constructivism in IR: Outline of Theory of Practice of Security Communities", Fifth pan-European Conference Standing Group on International Relations (2004), The Hague
- Don Oberdorfer, "The Two Koreas", pp.315~ (1997), Basic Books
- and identity, "Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade", 2004
- identity controversy, "Segeilbo, June 15, 2004", 2004
- NSC, "Peace, Prosperity, and National Security", pp.21~22 (2004), NSC
- "Reporter’'s column", Chosun Ilbo, October 9, 2006, ~ (2006)
- "President’'s comments in minister-level meeting", Yonhap News, October 4, 2006, ~ (2006)
- "President Roh’'s press interview"[URL]
- "ROK Government’'s Statement on North Korea’'s Nuclear Test"[URL]
- "Yonhap News, October 11, 2006", ~ (2006)
- "Dong-a Ilbo, October 13, 2006", ~ (2006)
- Roh, "Success and Frustration", 216~217
- "MOU Policy"[URL]