[Special Issue] From Authoritarian to Democratic Models of Post-Conflict Development: The Indonesian Experience
3
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Indonesia has experienced three periods of post-conflict development since World War II, and experimented with very different developmental models in each period. The first period followed the Japanese occupation (1942–45) and Indonesia’s national independence struggle (1945–49). Left with a devastated economy, weak human capital and a politicized population, national leaders stressed building a cohesive national identity, and adopted increasingly authoritarian political structures. Significant conflict erupted in the “outer islands” and the period ended in 1965–66 with massive violence directed against the political left. In the second period, an authoritarian military-led regime was in power. Partly modeling itself on the developmentalist states of Northeast Asia, it stressed political order and economic development. Rapid economic growth took place, but this approach had major costs, creating an inflexible political system that suppressed rather than ameliorated local tensions generated by development. The collapse of this model in 1997–98 was thus accompanied by widespread conflict. Since then,Indonesia has adopted a democratic political system. Attempts to rebuild communities shattered by violence in 1997–2005 have combined state-building, economic development initiatives, and patronage distribution. In presenting how governments have dealt with conflict and development issues across these three periods, the analysis emphasizes economic development and state-building policies, and their differential sub-national impacts. These two approaches have frequently played a double-edged role, sometimes undermining security, sometimes underpinning it.
Abstract
Indonesia has experienced three periods of post-conflict development since World War II, and experimented with very different developmental models in each period. The first period followed the Japanese occupation (1942–45) and Indonesia’s national independence struggle (1945–49). Left with a devastated economy, weak human capital and a politicized population, national leaders stressed building a cohesive national identity, and adopted increasingly authoritarian political structures. Significant conflict erupted in the “outer islands” and the period ended in 1965–66 with massive violence directed against the political left. In the second period, an authoritarian military-led regime was in power. Partly modeling itself on the developmentalist states of Northeast Asia, it stressed political order and economic development. Rapid economic growth took place, but this approach had major costs, creating an inflexible political system that suppressed rather than ameliorated local tensions generated by development. The collapse of this model in 1997–98 was thus accompanied by widespread conflict. Since then,Indonesia has adopted a democratic political system. Attempts to rebuild communities shattered by violence in 1997–2005 have combined state-building, economic development initiatives, and patronage distribution. In presenting how governments have dealt with conflict and development issues across these three periods, the analysis emphasizes economic development and state-building policies, and their differential sub-national impacts. These two approaches have frequently played a double-edged role, sometimes undermining security, sometimes underpinning it.
참고문헌 (49)
- Mohammed Ayoob, ""Defining Security: A Subaltern Realist Perspective,”, In Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases", pp.132~ (1997), Routledge
- Richard Stubbs, "War and Economic Development: Export-Oriented Industrialization in East and Southeast Asia", Comparative Politics, 31(2), pp.337~355 (1999)
- Suisheng Zhao, "A Nation-State by Construction: Dynamics of Modern Chinese Nationalism" (2004), Stanford University Press
- Kanishka Jayasuriya, "Singapore: The Politics of Regional Definition", The Pacific Review, 7(4), pp.411~420 (1994)
- Jacques Bertrand, "Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- George McTurnan Kahin, "Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia", pp.31~32 (1952), Cornell University Press
- Howard Dick, "The Emergence of a National Economy: An Economic History of Indonesia, 1800–-2000", pp.173~ (2002), Allen & Unwin
- Kahin, "Nationalism and Revolution", pp.476~
- Francis Fukuyama, "State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century", pp.7~ (2004), Cornell University Press
- Karl D. Jackson, "Bureaucratic Polity: A Theoretical Framework for the Analysis of Power and Communications in Indonesia, In Political Power and Communications in Indonesia" (1978), University of California Press
- Richard Robison, "Indonesia: The Rise of Capital" (1986), Allen and Unwin
- Benedict R, "O’'G Anderson, Old State, New Society: Indonesia’'s New Order in Comparative Historical Perspective", The Journal of Asian Studies, 42(3), pp.477~496 (1983)
- Dan Slater, "Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia", pp.15~ (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Edward Aspinall, "Opposing Suharto: Compromise, Resistance and Regime Change in Indonesia" (2005), Stanford University Press
- Paul K. Gellert, "Extractive Regimes: Toward a Better Understanding of Indonesian Development", Rural Sociology, 75(1), pp.28~57 (2010)
- Robert Wade, "East Asia’'s Economic Success: Conflicting Perspectives, Partial Insights, Shaky Evidence", World Politics, 44(2), pp.289~ (1992)
- Jeffrey A. Winters, "Oligarchy", pp.177~ (2011), Cambridge University Press
- Hal Hill, "The Indonesian Economy Since 1966: Southeast Asia’'s Emerging Giant", pp.17~ (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Mark R. Thompson, "The Anti-Marcos Struggle: Personalistic Rule and Democratic Transition in the Philippines", pp.193~206 (1995), Yale University Press
- Edward Aspinall, "Islam and Nation: Separatist Rebellion in Aceh, Indonesia" (2009), Stanford University Press
- Christine Drake, "National Integration in Indonesia: Patterns and Policies" (1989), University of Hawaii Press
- Edward Aspinall, "The Break-up of Indonesia? Nationalisms after Decolonisation and the Limits of the Nation-State in Post-Cold War Southeast Asia", Third World Quarterly, 22(6), pp.1003~1024 (2001)
- Dave McRae, "A Discourse on Separatists", Indonesia, (74), pp.37~58
- Paul Collier, "Greed and Grievance in Civil War", Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), pp.563~595 (2004)
- James D Fearon, "Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil War", American Political Science Review, 97(1), pp.75~90 (2003)
- Bertrand, Nationalism, "Communal Violence and Democratization in Indonesia: Small Town Wars" (2007), Routledge
- John Sidel, Riots, Pogroms, "Jihad: Religious Violence in Indonesia" (2006), Cornell University Press
- Edward Aspinall, "The Construction of Grievance: Natural Resources and Identity in a Separatist Conflict", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(6), pp.950~972 (2007)
- Bertrand, "Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict"
- Yuhki Tajima, "Explaining Ethnic Violence in Indonesia: Demilitarizing Domestic Security", Journal of East Asian Studies, 8(3), pp.451~472 (2008), 동아시아연구원
- Bridget Welsh, "Local and National: Keroyokan Mobbing in Indonesia", Journal of East Asian Studies, 8(3), pp.473~504 (2008), 동아시아연구원
- Ian Wilson, "Continuity and Change: The Changing Contours of Organized Violence in Post-New Order Indonesia", Critical Asian Studies, 38(2), pp.265~297 (2006)
- Adam Przeworski, "Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–-1990" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Aubrey Belford, "After years of inefficiency, Indonesia Emerges as an Economic Model", New York Times, August 5, 2010, ~ (2010)
- Femi Adi, "Indonesia Chases China As Middle-Class Consumption Soars", Bloomberg, May 2, 2012, ~ (2012)
- Edward Aspinall, "How Indonesia Survived: Comparative Perspectives on State Disintegration and Endurance, In Democracy: Comparative Perspectives", Columbia University Press
- Edward Aspinall, "Local Power and Politics in Indonesia: Democratisation and Decentralisation", Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (2003)
- Neles Tebay, "Dialogue between Jakarta and Papua: A Perspective from Papua", Pontifical Mission Society, Human Rights Office (2009)
- Radicalisation and Dialogue in Papua, "International Crisis Group", International Crisis Group, ~, pp.Asia Report, no. 188 (2010)
- "Multi-Stakeholder Review of Post-Conflict Programming in Aceh: Identifying the Foundations for Sustainable Peace and Development in Aceh", World Bank, 150~151 (2009)
- "Rencana Aksi Percepatan Pembangunan Provinsi Papua Dan Provinsi Papua Barat Tahun 2011–-2014"[URL]
- Graham Brown, "Overcoming Violent Conflict: Volume Four, Peace and Development Analysis in Maluku and North Maluku", United Nations Development Programme, pp.52~53 (2005)
- Dan Slater, "Indonesia’'s Accountability Trap: Party Cartels And Presidential Power After Democratic Transition", Indonesia, (78), pp.61~92 (2004)
- John Harriss, "Patronage Democracy in Provincial Indonesia, In Rethinking Popular Representation" (2009), Palgrave Macmillan
- Vedi R. Hadiz, "Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective" (2010), Stanford University Press
- Edward Aspinall, "Combatants to Contractors: The Political Economy of Peace in Aceh", Indonesia, (87), pp.1~34 (2009)
- "Guerrillas, Gangsters and Contractors: Integrating Former Combatants and Its Impact on SSR and Development in Post-conflict Societies"[URL]
- Rodd McGibbon, "Pitfalls of Papua: Understanding the Conflict and its Place in Australia–- Indonesia Relations", Lowy Institute for International Policy (2006)
- Richard Jackson, "Regime Security, In Contemporary Security Studies", pp.188~ (2007), Oxford University Press