본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

文學現代性的建立:二○年代台灣文學論的啟蒙內容及其結構

The Construction Literature Modernity : Analyzing Taiwan Modern Literature Theory

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Taiwan Modern Literature Theory as a subject, this essay is about analyzing its enlightening content and structure. The main content of enlightenment is concluded to be Utilitarianism, Nationalism and Individualism. Among these initial literature theory,some were shown by the way of New/old Literary Fliting, with strong character of discourse. Therefore, after analyzing the structure of discourse in this essay, it is found that Utilitarianism is constructed on dualistic structure of New/Old; Nationalism discusses the function of literature by separating Self/Others; Individualism approving forthright, sincere and feeling of literature expression, makes opposition of True/False of personal emotions,meanwhile, emphasizing fictional and imaginary properties in formalism. Building three characters through these three opposing structure, contains meanings below over Taiwan and World historical development of literature. First,accepting modern concepts and values and giving criticism of traditional word and literature presented anti-feudal and modernity. Second, combining literature and nation fate under Taiwan’s unequal colonial status and situation not only showed the anti-imperialistic character but also reflected the universal modern appearance of the time on effort of build up national literature. Third, the discovery of personality and selfhood in Individualism as well as unique cognition of literary expression, had pushed practical literature theory to an art level, and emerged the modern character of literature.

Abstract

Taiwan Modern Literature Theory as a subject, this essay is about analyzing its enlightening content and structure. The main content of enlightenment is concluded to be Utilitarianism, Nationalism and Individualism. Among these initial literature theory,some were shown by the way of New/old Literary Fliting, with strong character of discourse. Therefore, after analyzing the structure of discourse in this essay, it is found that Utilitarianism is constructed on dualistic structure of New/Old; Nationalism discusses the function of literature by separating Self/Others; Individualism approving forthright, sincere and feeling of literature expression, makes opposition of True/False of personal emotions,meanwhile, emphasizing fictional and imaginary properties in formalism. Building three characters through these three opposing structure, contains meanings below over Taiwan and World historical development of literature. First,accepting modern concepts and values and giving criticism of traditional word and literature presented anti-feudal and modernity. Second, combining literature and nation fate under Taiwan’s unequal colonial status and situation not only showed the anti-imperialistic character but also reflected the universal modern appearance of the time on effort of build up national literature. Third, the discovery of personality and selfhood in Individualism as well as unique cognition of literary expression, had pushed practical literature theory to an art level, and emerged the modern character of literature.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. , 台灣民報, (72) (1925)
  2. 炳, "社會改造和我們的使命", 台灣民報, 1(4) (1923)
  3. 陳炘, "文學與職務", 台灣青年, 1(1) (1920)
  4. 陳端明, "日用文鼓吹論", 台灣青年, 4(1) (1922)
  5. 甘文芳, "現實社會與文學", 台灣青年, 3(3) (1921)
  6. 黃呈聰, "論普及白話文的新使命", 台灣, (1) (1923)
  7. 黃朝琴, "漢文改革論", 台灣, (2) (1923)
  8. 秀湖, "中國新文學運動的過去現在將來", 台灣民報, (4) (1923)
  9. 蘇維霖, "二十年來的中國古文學及文學革命的略述", 台灣民報, 2(10) (1924)
  10. 張梗, "討論舊小說的改革問題", 台灣民報, 2(17) (1924)
  11. 蔡孝乾, , 台灣民報, 3(12) (1925)
  12. 張我軍, "糟糕的文學界", 台灣民報, 2(24) (1924)
  13. 張我軍, , 台灣民報, 3(6) (1925)
  14. 張我軍, "請合力拆下這座敗草欉中的破舊殿堂", 台灣民報, 3(1) (1925)
  15. 張我軍, "為文學界一哭", 台灣民報, 2(7) (1925)
  16. 張我軍, "絕無僅有的擊鉢吟的意義", 台灣民報, 3(2) (1925)
  17. 張我軍, "揭破悶葫蘆", 台灣民報, 3(3) (1925)
  18. 張我軍, "復鄭軍我書", 台灣民報, 3(6) (1925)
  19. 張我軍, "詩體的解放", 台灣民報, 3(7) (1925)
  20. "吳德功先生全集" (1992), 台灣省文獻委員會
  21. 周婉窈, "台灣歷史圖說:史前至一九四五年" (1997), 聯經
  22. 廖漢臣, "新舊文學之爭-台灣文壇一筆流水賬", 台北文物, 3(2) (1954)
  23. 莊淑芝, "台灣新文學觀念的萌芽與實踐" (1994), 麥田
  24. 梁明雄, "日據時期台灣新文學運動研究" (1996), 文史哲
  25. 施懿琳, "日治時期新舊文學論戰的再考察──兼論其對台灣傳統詩壇的影響" (1998), 台灣古典文學與文獻
  26. 葉連鵬, "重讀日據時期台灣新舊文學論戰──起因、過程與結果的再思考", 台灣文學學報, (2), pp.33~65 (2001), 國立政治大學台灣文學研究所
  27. 黃美娥, "對立與協力:日治時期台灣新舊文學論戰中傳統文人的典律反省及文化思維", 台灣文學學報, (4) (2003), 國立政治大學台灣文學研究所
  28. 翁聖峰, "日據時期台灣新舊文學論爭新探" (2007)
  29. Bakhtin, M. M, "Marxism and the Philosophy of Language" (1973), Harvard Univ. Press
  30. Benedict Anderson, "想像的共同體" (1999), 時報出版

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)