본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Should Japan go Nuclear?

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In view of the changing security environment in Northeast Asia, stemming fromChina’s assertiveness in regional issues and North Korea’s nuclear weapons program,the threat perception in Japan has considerably heightened. This has triggered adebate domestically in Japan about whether it is an appropriate time to review itsnuclear option as a means of deterrence. Such thinking presupposes that confidencein the U.S. extended deterrence has started eroding or has weakened. There arevarious political strands to this issue and there is no consensus yet reached to makethe change officially possible. If Japan does indeed initiate a change in policyseriously, it would make the United States uncomfortable. But given the stronganti-nuclear sentiment in Japan, it would be difficult for any government of anyparty to sell the idea to the people. The domino effect of such a policy changewould be seen almost immediately in South Korea and Taiwan, making NortheastAsia the world’s most nuclearized region. This would also mean the abrogationof the security alliance relationship with the United States. Given Japan’s capabilityin terms of capital, technology and possession of sufficient spent fuel needed formaking the nuclear bomb it would be possible for Japan to make a nuclear bomb,but it would be a politically dangerous move and therefore inadvisable. Though itwould remain theoretically possible, the debate would remain as an academicexercise for quite some time. This essay makes an attempt to study this complexissue as objectively as possible.

Abstract

In view of the changing security environment in Northeast Asia, stemming fromChina’s assertiveness in regional issues and North Korea’s nuclear weapons program,the threat perception in Japan has considerably heightened. This has triggered adebate domestically in Japan about whether it is an appropriate time to review itsnuclear option as a means of deterrence. Such thinking presupposes that confidencein the U.S. extended deterrence has started eroding or has weakened. There arevarious political strands to this issue and there is no consensus yet reached to makethe change officially possible. If Japan does indeed initiate a change in policyseriously, it would make the United States uncomfortable. But given the stronganti-nuclear sentiment in Japan, it would be difficult for any government of anyparty to sell the idea to the people. The domino effect of such a policy changewould be seen almost immediately in South Korea and Taiwan, making NortheastAsia the world’s most nuclearized region. This would also mean the abrogationof the security alliance relationship with the United States. Given Japan’s capabilityin terms of capital, technology and possession of sufficient spent fuel needed formaking the nuclear bomb it would be possible for Japan to make a nuclear bomb,but it would be a politically dangerous move and therefore inadvisable. Though itwould remain theoretically possible, the debate would remain as an academicexercise for quite some time. This essay makes an attempt to study this complexissue as objectively as possible.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Anthony H. Cordesman, "The Evolving Military Balance in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia: Conventional Balance, Asymmetric Forces, and U.S. Forces" (2013), Rowman & Littlefield
  2. Andrew O’Neil, "Asia, the US and Extended Nuclear Deterrence: Atomic Umbrella in the Twenty-First Century" (2013), Routledge
  3. "Remarks by President Barack Obama" (2009)[URL]
  4. "Little Content, Even Little Satisfaction in Obama’s Nuclear Weapons Policy"[URL]
  5. "Deterrence, NPT and the Two Koreas—South Korean Perspective"[URL]
  6. "Japan-U.S. Extended Deterrence Dialogue"[URL]
  7. Rajaram Panda, "Japan’s National Security Strategy and Reactions from China", C3S Paper, (2051), pp.2014~ (2014)
  8. ""Japan’s National Security Strategy, "December 17, 2013" (2013)[URL]
  9. Satoh Yukio, "Responsibility Sharing for the U.S. Extended Deterrence", Diplomacy, (19) (2014)
  10. "Extended Nuclear Deterrence in Northeast Asia" (2012)[URL]
  11. "Nuclear Weapons Program–Japan" (2014)[URL]
  12. "House of Representatives minutes" (1967)[URL]
  13. "Japan: Ratification of Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons" (1976)[URL]
  14. "South Korea Flirts with Nuclear Ideas as North Blusters" (2013)[URL]
  15. "Japan: Hawks coming out of the woodwork" (2003)[URL]
  16. "Japan Nuclear Fuel Cycle Development Institute"[URL]
  17. "Japanese Official Forced to Quit after Endorsing Nuclear Arms" (1999)[URL]
  18. "Scholar says Nishimura’s nuclear view shared by Obuchi" (1999)[URL]
  19. Japanese Policy and Nuclear Arms, "Jay Sorenson", American-Asian Education Exchange, 27~28 (1975)
  20. "POLITICS-JAPAN: Discomfort Rises over Views on Nukes"[URL]
  21. Kurt M. Campbell, "The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices" (2004), Brookings Institution
  22. Selig S. Harrison, "Japan’s Nuclear Future: The Plutonium Debate and East Asian Security" (1996), Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
  23. John E. Endicott, "Japan’s Nuclear Option:Political, Technical, and Strategic Factors" (1975), Praeger
  24. 박한규, "Constructivism in Security Studies on Pacific Asia:Assessing its strengths and weaknesses", Pacific Focus, 17(2), pp.145~175 (2002), 국제관계연구소
  25. [URL]
  26. Kenneth N. Waltz, "The Emerging Structure of International Politics", International Security, 18(2), pp.44~79 (1993)
  27. Richard J. Samuels, "Strategic Asia 2013–2014: Asia in the Second Nuclear Age" (2013)
  28. "Unclassified Statement for the Record on the Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence" (2012)[URL]
  29. "National Security’Amendment to Nuclear Law Raises Fears of Military Use", Asahi Shimbun, June 21, 2012, ~ (2012)
  30. Japan Refuses to Back Statement against A-bombs, , Japan Times, April 26, 2013, ~ (2013)
  31. Ariel E. Levite, "Never Say Never Again:Nuclear Reversal Revisited", International Security, 27(3), pp.59~88 (2002)
  32. Mike M. Mochizuki, "Japan Tests the Nuclear Taboo", Nonproliferation Review, 14(2), pp.311~ (2007)
  33. Llewelyn Hughes, "Why Japan Will Not Go Nuclear (Yet): International and Domestic Constraints on the Nuclearization of Japan", International Security, 31(4), pp.67~96 (2007)
  34. "Japan Eyes Cruise missiles to attack N. Korea"[URL]
  35. "Japan Must Develop Nuclear Weapons, warns Tokyo Governor" (2011)[URL]
  36. "Could South Korea and Japan go Nuclear?" (2013)[URL]
  37. "Rising Voices in S. Korea, Japan Advocate Nuclear Weapons" (2013)[URL]
  38. Fred Charles Ikle, "Japan’s Grand Strategy", Foreign Affairs, (Summer) (1990)
  39. Ke Wang, "Japan’s ‘Defense’ Policy", Stanford Journal of East Asian Affair, 8(1)
  40. "Japan Can Construct Nuclear Bomb Using its Power Plant Plutonium" (2002)[URL]
  41. "The Constitution of Japan" (1946)[URL]
  42. "LDP out to Undermine Constitution"[URL]
  43. Rajaram Panda, "Japan’s Move on Collective Self-Defense Timely and Appropriate", C3S Paper, (2120) (2014)
  44. "Some Suggest S. Korea go Nuclear" (2013)[URL]
  45. "Little Content, Even Less Satisfaction in Obama’s Nuclear Weapons Policy"[URL]
  46. "Avoid a Nuclear Arm Race between South Korea and Japan" (2013)[URL]
  47. "Will Japan go Nuclear?" (2009)[URL]
  48. "Why Japan will never go nuclear" (2006)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)