Neither Realistic nor Effective: The Fallacy of U.S. Nuke Redeployment in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the logics and problems of U.S. nuclear weapon redeploymentdemands among the general public in the Republic of Korea (ROK) to cope withthe nuclear threat from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). Proponents of the idea believe that redeploying U.S. nuclear weapons on ROKsoil will help to restore the military balance on the Korean Peninsula and strengthenstrategic options for denuclearization efforts. However, U.S. nuclear weaponredeployment is not only contradictory to defense policy of both the ROK and theUnited States, but also not so effective in terms of both military and diplomaticaspects. The ROK and U.S. governments should seek and carry out more practicalpolicy alternatives to deter military challenges from a nuclear-armed North Koreaand revitalize efforts for denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, rather thanresorting to the illusion of U.S. nuclear weapon redeployment.
Abstract
This paper examines the logics and problems of U.S. nuclear weapon redeploymentdemands among the general public in the Republic of Korea (ROK) to cope withthe nuclear threat from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). Proponents of the idea believe that redeploying U.S. nuclear weapons on ROKsoil will help to restore the military balance on the Korean Peninsula and strengthenstrategic options for denuclearization efforts. However, U.S. nuclear weaponredeployment is not only contradictory to defense policy of both the ROK and theUnited States, but also not so effective in terms of both military and diplomaticaspects. The ROK and U.S. governments should seek and carry out more practicalpolicy alternatives to deter military challenges from a nuclear-armed North Koreaand revitalize efforts for denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, rather thanresorting to the illusion of U.S. nuclear weapon redeployment.
참고문헌 (46)
- Christopher R. Hill, "The Elusive Vision of a Non-nuclear North Korea", The Washington Quarterly, 36(2), pp.9~13 (2013)
- Siegfried S. Hecker, "Extraordinary Visits: Lessons Learned from Engaging with North Korea", Nonproliferation Review, 18(2), pp.451~ (2011)
- Future Directions in the DPRK’s Nuclear Weapons Program: Three Scenarios For 2020, "David Albright", U.S.-Korea Institute at SAIS, 19~ (2015)
- Albright, "Future Directions in the DPRK’s Nuclear Weapons Program", 30~
- Kelsey Davenport, "North Korea Conducts Nuclear Test", Arms Control Today, 43(2), pp.21~ (2013)
- Kim Jiyoon, "The Fallout: South Korean Public Opinion Following North Korea’s Third Nuclear Test", Issue Brief, (46), pp.9~10 (2013)
- Terence Roehrig, "The Case for a Nuclear-free South", JoongAng Daily, ~ (2014)
- Daniel Dombey, "U.S. Rules out Nuclear Redeployment in S. Korea", Financial Times, ~ (2011)
- Wade L. Huntley, "Speed Bump on the Road to Global Zero: U.S. Nuclear Reductions and Extended Deterrence in East Asia", Nonproliferation Review, 20(2), pp.321~ (2013)
- Richard Dean Burns, "A Global History of the Nuclear Arms Race: Weapons, Strategy, and Politics, 1", pp.136~ (2013), Praeger
- James F. Schnabel, "The Joint Chiefs of Staff and National Policy:Vol. III, 1951–1953, The Korean War. Part Two", pp.206~207 (1953), Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
- Burns, "A Global History of the Nuclear Arms Race", 136~
- Conrad C. Crane, "The Air Campaign over Korea: Pressuring the Enemy", Joint Force Quarterly, (28), pp.83~84 (2001)
- Terence Roehrig, "From Deterrence to Engagement: The U.S. Defense Commitment to South Korea", pp.186~ (2006), Lexington Books
- Department of Defense: Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1979, "Harold Brown", GPO, 67~68 (1979)
- David S. McDonough, "Nuclear Superiority or Mutually Assured Deterrence: The Development of U.S. Nuclear Deterrent", International Journal, 60(3), pp.813~814 (2005)
- Roehrig, "From Deterrence to Engagement", 189~
- Robert S. Norris, "Where They Were", The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 55(6), pp.30~ (1999)
- Peter Hayes, "Pacific Powderkeg: American Nuclear Dilemmas in Korea", pp.102~ (1991), Lexington Books
- Roehrig, "From Deterrence to Engagement", 189~
- Hayes, "Pacific Powderkeg: American Nuclear Dilemmas in Korea", 102~
- Roehrig, "From Deterrence to Engagement", 191~
- Kang Choi, "The Long Shadow: Nuclear Weapons and Security in 21st Century Asia", pp.379~ (2008), Stanford University Press
- Nuclear Weapons and Coercive Escalation in Regional Conflicts:Lessons from North Korea and Pakistan, "Jerry Meyerle", CNA Analysis and Solutions, 28~ (2014)
- Huntley, "Speed Bump on the Road to Global Zero", 321~
- Seongwhun Cheon, "A Tactical Step That Makes Sense for South Korea", Global Asia, 7(2), pp.75~ (2012)
- Project Atom: A Competitive Strategies Approach to Defining U.S. Nuclear Strategy and Posture for 2025–2050, "Clark Murdock", Center for Strategic and International Studies, 14~15 (2014)
- Cheon, "A Tactical Step That Makes Sense for South Korea", 76~
- Lynn E. Davis, "Lessons of the INF Treaty", Foreign Affairs, 66(4), pp.724~ (1988)
- Nuclear Posture Review Report, "Office of the Secretary of Defense", Department of Defense, 1~ (2010)
- Hans M. Kristensen, "U.S. Nuclear Forces 2015", The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(2), pp.108~ (2015)
- Nuclear Posture Review Report, "Office of the Secretary of Defense", 15~17
- Report on Nuclear Employment Strategy of the United States, "U.S. Department of Defense", 10~, pp.Release No: 450-13 (2013)
- Huntley, "Speed Bump on the Road to Global Zero", 318~
- Kristensen, "U.S. Nuclear Forces 2015", 115~
- Peter Hayes, "The War that Must Never Be Fought: Dilemmas of Nuclear Deterrence", pp.403~ (2015), Hoover Institution Press
- Ward Wilson, "The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence", Nonproliferation Review, 15(3), pp.433~434 (2008)
- Hayes, "Korea: Will South Korea’s Non-Nuclear Strategy Defeat North Korea’s Nuclear Breakout?", 403~
- James Hardy, "Korea Progression: Seoul Adapts to Threats from the North", Jane’s Defence Weekly, ~ (2014)
- Andy Oppenheimer, "Ballistic Missile Defence: Facing Multiple Threats", Military Technology, 39(7–8), pp.20~21 (2015)
- Strategic Survey 2015, "International Institute for Strategic Studies", Routledge, 378~379 (2015)
- "Asia-Pacific Security Regional Security Assessment 2015", International Institute for Strategic Studies, 121~ (2015)
- Oppenheimer, "Ballistic Missile Defence: Facing Multiple Threats", 22~
- Andrew O’Neil, "Asia, the US and Extended Nuclear Deterrence: Atomic Umbrellas in the Twenty-first Century", pp.62~ (2013), Routledge
- Ministry of National Defense, "2014 Defense White Paper", pp.60~61 (2015), Ministry of National Defense
- Robert S. McNamara, "The Military Role of Nuclear Weapons: Perceptions and Misperceptions", Foreign Affairs, 62(1), pp.71~72 (1983)